If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ3
Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera,
but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? Mick. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:31:01 +1000, Mick Breen wrote:
Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera, but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? I picked one up as a secondary camera because of its stabilized 12x zoom and f2.8 throughout its zoom range, to photograph wildlife and other things beyond the reach of a 3x zoom. My thought is that the zoom would be better to capture what I want instead of cropping an image from a higher megapixel camera (larger file size) and possibly losing some detail in previous compression. Besides its normal automatic modes, it has specific modes to get the right look for things like snow, night scenes, fireworks, etc. Included in its resolutions for taking photos is a resolution suitable for widescreen HDTV. My first test was photos up and down the block at night from a tripod on my porch. I was impressed, and could read a street sign 1/2 long block away lit by a street light. Even a porch light was enough to get a decent photo. 48x at night (12x + 4x digital) was grainy and not as sharp. But as long as digital zoom was disabled, the 12x zoom worked great. Its flash is not that strong and it has no plug for external flash. But it seems to take decent photos indoors even without flash, so that is not that much of an issue unless people are moving (which can be an interesting effect). Shutter speed is slower without the flash indoors, but as long as you hold the camera steady (and not overly rely on image stabilization) it takes sharp photos. Per the reviews it can get grainy if something (like shutter priority) pushes it to ISO 400. Although, that may depend saved resolution, or what size the image is viewed or printed. But if the camera compensated for that, images would not be as sharp as they are (which under brigher conditions is sharper than other cameras). It does not have manual focus. But it does have an IR light to help it focus in low light. It is light weight, but a bit bulky. But it seems to be the best in its price range to reach out for sharp photos without decreasing f-stop at higher zoom. So it suits my needs (my other camera is a Nikon 990). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:31:01 +1000, Mick Breen wrote:
Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera, but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? I picked one up as a secondary camera because of its stabilized 12x zoom and f2.8 throughout its zoom range, to photograph wildlife and other things beyond the reach of a 3x zoom. My thought is that the zoom would be better to capture what I want instead of cropping an image from a higher megapixel camera (larger file size) and possibly losing some detail in previous compression. Besides its normal automatic modes, it has specific modes to get the right look for things like snow, night scenes, fireworks, etc. Included in its resolutions for taking photos is a resolution suitable for widescreen HDTV. My first test was photos up and down the block at night from a tripod on my porch. I was impressed, and could read a street sign 1/2 long block away lit by a street light. Even a porch light was enough to get a decent photo. 48x at night (12x + 4x digital) was grainy and not as sharp. But as long as digital zoom was disabled, the 12x zoom worked great. Its flash is not that strong and it has no plug for external flash. But it seems to take decent photos indoors even without flash, so that is not that much of an issue unless people are moving (which can be an interesting effect). Shutter speed is slower without the flash indoors, but as long as you hold the camera steady (and not overly rely on image stabilization) it takes sharp photos. Per the reviews it can get grainy if something (like shutter priority) pushes it to ISO 400. Although, that may depend saved resolution, or what size the image is viewed or printed. But if the camera compensated for that, images would not be as sharp as they are (which under brigher conditions is sharper than other cameras). It does not have manual focus. But it does have an IR light to help it focus in low light. It is light weight, but a bit bulky. But it seems to be the best in its price range to reach out for sharp photos without decreasing f-stop at higher zoom. So it suits my needs (my other camera is a Nikon 990). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Mick Breen" wrote in message ... Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera, but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? Mick. I love mine. Bad points? I have no specific criticisms. I know the limits of small sensor non dSLR cameras and I stick to situations my FZ3 excels at. Some say it is noisier at higher ISOs than other similar cameras. I can't confirm because I shoot almost exclusively at ISO80 and hardly ever shoot indoors or in low light situations unless I use a longer exposure and a tripod. (I do remove noise in software afterwards with longer exposure night shots) If pushed I guess I could name a few desired improvements :- - 1.5" lcd could be larger (and is on the newer FZ5 I think), - I would like an AE lock button, - their should be a thread on the end of the lens rather than having to use the included plastic lens hood that is not capable of supporting heavy tele converters (there is a replacement metal yoshida adaptor that is on my shopping list http://butabara-tec.com/) - I would like the camera to be available in black (personal preference) Three out of these four criticisms are not applicable to the FZ20, but I like the compact size of the 3 and I'm happy with the trade off. But forget the bad points. This is an excellent camera packed with features that make it amazing value for money. The 12x image stabilised leica lens is f/2.8 even at the tele end. It is equivalent in 35mm terms to 35-420mm and can be handheld with ease (and good technique). It is a very compact camera. It has all the modes that I need at the moment (aperture priority f/2.8 - f/8) , shutter priority (8secs - 1/2000, M & P modes, macro etc) as well as scene modes that my wife likes (landscape, portrait sports etc.) If you want to see what the 12x can do, I took the 2 photos in this link handheld at 35mm and 420mm. :- http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12320135 Here are some examples of longer exposure night shots (tripod mounted) http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12799128 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12040306 And a few bird shots :- http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12263880 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12647935 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12623526 http://s8.invisionfree.com/Panasonic...showtopic=1040 And a few golf shots :- http://s8.invisionfree.com/Panasonic...?showtopic=988 http://s8.invisionfree.com/Panasonic...?showtopic=995 I'm sure there are better cameras out there and my photos can probably be picked to bits but I'm happy with the camera and the pix it takes FWIW, 6 months ago I didn't even know what aperture was and only had a fully automatic camera. I've done a *lot* of reading and learning with the help of many of the excellent forums and resources on the net, and the FZ3 has been a great companion on that journey. Hope this helps. Tony |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Mick Breen" wrote in message ... Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera, but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? Mick. + features of the FZ3 Small size, light weight Looks cool with lens hood Price - I paid $285 Works with hi-speed memory 12X zoom lever and shutter controlled with one finger Continuous 2.4 zoom Many, many features Sabu |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Mick Breen" wrote in message ... Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera, but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? Mick. + features of the FZ3 Small size, light weight Looks cool with lens hood Price - I paid $285 Works with hi-speed memory 12X zoom lever and shutter controlled with one finger Continuous 2.4 zoom Many, many features Sabu |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mick Breen" wrote in message ... Hi all, I have read as many tests and reviews as I can about this camera, but was wondering how any of the owners find it. Maybe it's good and bad points ? Mick. + features of the FZ3 Small size, light weight Looks cool with lens hood Price - I paid $285 Works with hi-speed memory 12X zoom lever and shutter controlled with one finger Continuous 2.4 zoom Many, many features Sabu |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Beware! Panasonic BQ-380 charger! | Robert Scott | Digital Photography | 9 | March 5th 05 01:55 PM |
Panasonic cameras | Robert Morrisette | Digital Photography | 2 | October 28th 04 03:34 PM |
FA: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1 Digital camera with Leica 12X optical zoom lens | Marvin Culpepper | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | October 15th 04 01:05 AM |
FA: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1 Digital camera with Leica 12X optical zoom lens | Marvin Culpepper | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | October 15th 04 01:05 AM |
FA: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1 Digital camera with Leica 12X optical zoom lens | Marvin Culpepper | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | October 15th 04 01:05 AM |