If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Un-retouched photos - Galleries
wrote in message ps.com... It is my understanding that in any digital cameras, image processing is made inside the camera using the image sensor processing engine. In some advanced digital cameras, they let the users keep the unprocessed photos (RAW files), instead of the JPG files (which had been processed by the camera). My questions are as follows: - what is the extension file for RAW ? (like .jpg in jpeg files) Could this RAW files be viewed using any photo viewer software (as they are, i.e. without interference or retouching from the software?) . Or everytime you open the RAW files in a certain viewer (like picasa, PSP, PS, etc), it is automatically semi-processed by the software before they are shwon on the screen. - Do all or most available photo galleries in the websites contain photos which have been modified or re-touched? How do you identify gallery sites which contain photos that are NOT retouched? Are there such websites which only promote unretouched photos? If I want to see how the various cameras compare in producing its pictures, I consider the "inside" processing by the camera for the first time is considered as original pictures (one chance for the camera's processing engine to form the picture). However, I heard that some cameras now allow for re-touching while viewing in the camera. It is another manipulation addition, and I would not considered the manipulated photos as original. I would be interested to know if there is a way to find out that a JPEG file has been re-touched by a software (PSP, PS, etc), or even if it has been retouched inside the camera. Is there a way to find out? I saw incredible portraiture photos in a number of the photo sharing websites, and they have colourful, sharp photos. The ones that I particularly like appeared to be taken using a D2X, D70 or D200. My question is again, whether any manipulations are done on the photos. Could someone show me similar kind of portraiture photos taken using other brand name pro cameras (i.e. with similar rich colour and razor sharp images)? On similar line of thought, I also saw photos which are presented by camera reviewer websites - photos taken out of the box as part of the review of the camera. I assume these photos are nor manipulated (other than done inside the camera). Unfortunately, I can see that NONE have good, rich colour and sharpness that I like. Someone suggested that it is perhaps my computer monitor that needs adjustment. But, I am seeing the photos on the same computer. There are a contrasting difference between these photos and the one I saw at photo galleries. Thanks for info and discussion. Why would anyone not enhance (retouch) an image to improve it if it were possible to do so. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Un-retouched photos - Galleries
"Mike Cawood, HND BIT" wrote in message ... wrote in message ps.com... It is my understanding that in any digital cameras, image processing is made inside the camera using the image sensor processing engine. In some advanced digital cameras, they let the users keep the unprocessed photos (RAW files), instead of the JPG files (which had been processed by the camera). My questions are as follows: - what is the extension file for RAW ? (like .jpg in jpeg files) Could this RAW files be viewed using any photo viewer software (as they are, i.e. without interference or retouching from the The filename extention for RAW is .raw. You may view & process RAW files using IrfanView http://www.irfanview.net/ Regards Mike. That's strange. My Nikon D80 produces Raw images with a .dng extension. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Un-retouched photos - Galleries
"Frank Arthur" wrote Why would anyone not enhance (retouch) an image to improve it if it were possible to do so. This depends upon the purpose of the image. For instance, the retouching of news photographs can be of serious concern if it alters a relatively straightfoward depiction of reality. (This is a legal minefield so my words are just a rough description.) And then there are photos such as in holiday brochures where retouching can give a false impression of the resort. (Although in this case it is unusual for them not to be retouched). There are countless other examples. Roger |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Un-retouched photos - Galleries
wrote: It is my understanding that in any digital cameras, image processing is made inside the camera using the image sensor processing engine. In some advanced digital cameras, they let the users keep the unprocessed photos (RAW files), instead of the JPG files (which had been processed by the camera). My questions are as follows: - what is the extension file for RAW ? (like .jpg in jpeg files) Could this RAW files be viewed using any photo viewer software (as they are, i.e. without interference or retouching from the software?) . Or everytime you open the RAW files in a certain viewer (like picasa, PSP, PS, etc), it is automatically semi-processed by the software before they are shwon on the screen. - Do all or most available photo galleries in the websites contain photos which have been modified or re-touched? How do you identify gallery sites which contain photos that are NOT retouched? Are there such websites which only promote unretouched photos? If I want to see how the various cameras compare in producing its pictures, I consider the "inside" processing by the camera for the first time is considered as original pictures (one chance for the camera's processing engine to form the picture). However, I heard that some cameras now allow for re-touching while viewing in the camera. It is another manipulation addition, and I would not considered the manipulated photos as original. I would be interested to know if there is a way to find out that a JPEG file has been re-touched by a software (PSP, PS, etc), or even if it has been retouched inside the camera. Is there a way to find out? I saw incredible portraiture photos in a number of the photo sharing websites, and they have colourful, sharp photos. The ones that I particularly like appeared to be taken using a D2X, D70 or D200. My question is again, whether any manipulations are done on the photos. Could someone show me similar kind of portraiture photos taken using other brand name pro cameras (i.e. with similar rich colour and razor sharp images)? On similar line of thought, I also saw photos which are presented by camera reviewer websites - photos taken out of the box as part of the review of the camera. I assume these photos are nor manipulated (other than done inside the camera). Unfortunately, I can see that NONE have good, rich colour and sharpness that I like. Someone suggested that it is perhaps my computer monitor that needs adjustment. But, I am seeing the photos on the same computer. There are a contrasting difference between these photos and the one I saw at photo galleries. Thanks for info and discussion. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Un-retouched photos - Galleries
i take pic in raw and have up grade to 3.7 in photo shop because of
the camera i've goti think raw is better because u have more control |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Un-retouched photos - Galleries
you have control doesn't mean you know how to control. tweaking trials and
errors visually is fun but to do it right need understanding. it is not a matter of better but appropriately selected. wrote in message ps.com... i take pic in raw and have up grade to 3.7 in photo shop because of the camera i've goti think raw is better because u have more control |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Un-retouched photos - Galleries | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 19 | September 13th 07 05:37 PM |
Galleries for FZ5? | Eric Babula | Digital Photography | 9 | April 3rd 05 03:52 AM |
New Galleries | Robert R Kircher, Jr. | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | February 7th 05 06:40 AM |
Goa Photos, Belur Photos, Halebid Photos, Mangalore Photos, Hampi Photos | Venkatesh | Digital Photography | 5 | November 8th 04 01:44 AM |
my galleries ... | arnonaud | Digital Photography | 3 | August 24th 04 08:31 AM |