Fuji X-Pro1 is ok, but $2300 for it and a lens seems like a lot

Bruce wrote in
:

RichA wrote:
I handled it a bit today. It's light, feels like it's made of
plastic, but it could be a lightweight metal body. The 35mm f2.0
is...distressing.


Yes, it is *so* distressing, mainly because there isn't a 35mm f/2 in
the range. Neither is one planned.

So it is not a surprise that you are distressed. Handling
non-existent lenses is not something that people of a delicate
disposition should attempt to do.


Odd. I glanced briefly at the lens and was sure it said 35mm f2.0. Might
have been another number I saw on it. The front element was small too.
If it's still there when I go back for the Olympus I'll look at it again.