Sony's new sensor. "white" pixel filtering?

In article , tony cooper
wrote:

obviously, a lot of people are buying their products, which explains
why they are so commonly seen in a wide variety of venues. if apple
really did have as tiny a share as you seem to think, then one wouldn't
expect to see anywhere near as many, and that's clearly not the case.

The total number of units is huge. A small percentage of the total is
still a lot of units.

it's not about total units, it's about percentages. you do understand
the difference, right?

This is the kind of statement that destroys your credibility. In
reply to a comment about "...one wouldn't expect to see anywhere near
as many...", I wrote "The total number of units is huge" and you
idiotically replied "it's not about total units, it's about
percentages".

Your whole argument is based on the number of total units.

no it isn't and it never was. don't twist what i've said.

You feel
that because you see a lot of units in use that Apple has a greater
share - percentage - of the market. Not seeing that a huge market
results in a lot of units in use of a brand that holds a small share
of the total market is almost unbelievably dense.

nope. what i said was those 'official' market share numbers don't match
reality.

apple stock broke 490 today, which means apple is now worth more than
microsoft and google *combined*, further proof that those 'official'
numbers don't mean a whole lot.

if two pieces of wire are electrically identical, there won't be any
difference in what you hear no matter what is played through them. how
could there be?

There are some types of music that if a badly scratched CD of the
music was played you wouldn't notice the scratch.

there you go twisting things. i'm talking about speaker *wire*, not
cds, scratched or not.

You are talking about the clarity of sound as heard delivered by two
different systems. You can't *hear* the music using just wire of any
kind. The clarity of sound is dependent on all of the components of
the system.

of course all of the components matter to the sound. nobody said
otherwise. yet another diversion.

the issue that started this thread is about speaker cable, not other
components. in particular, it was monster cable versus coat hanger. you
are bringing up scratched cds, laptop speakers and who knows what else
you have in mind.

You are talking about
the reproduction of sound and discerning the clarity of what you hear
compared to what it should sound like or what it sounds like on the
other system. There is some "music" that would sound the same no
matter what wire was use.

*all* music will sound the same if the wires have the same electrical
characteristics. ultimately, it's nothing more than electrons bouncing
around and they don't care what music it is, or that it is even music
at all. it could be dc.

If that was the case, all music would sound the same coming from your
laptop's onboard speakers as it would coming from a set of Bang &
Olufsen high-end speakers.

there you go twisting things. i'm talking about speaker *wire*, not
speakers. seriously, do try to stay on topic.

Read what I wrote above.

Are you seriously claiming that the laptop and the B&O systems would
reproduce sound the same if both used the same wire?

i never said that. read what i wrote above.

wires just carry an electrical current. speakers convert that
electrical current into movement of air. you do understand the
difference, right?

Read what I wrote above.

You make inane statements and unsupportable claims and then whine that
any contradiction of those statements or claims is "twisting" what you
say. Pitiful.

all my statements are supportable and i provide links when necessary.
what's pitiful is you keep twisting what i say and adding all sorts of
unrelated things in a desperate attempt to show that something i said
was wrong. it isn't working and it is making you look incredibly
foolish.