If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax *ist D
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a
couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. Since I already have 3 other Pentax camera's and a few lenses in my collection (which can be used on the *ist), it makes economical sense to go with this camera. But... any real-world gotcha's (reliability, parts falling off, etc.) that only show up after having used it for awhile - any regrets? Just a novice photographer with high expectations ! Thanks, Bob S. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax *ist D
In article ,
"BobS" wrote: About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. Since I already have 3 other Pentax camera's and a few lenses in my collection (which can be used on the *ist), it makes economical sense to go with this camera. But... any real-world gotcha's (reliability, parts falling off, etc.) that only show up after having used it for awhile - any regrets? Just a novice photographer with high expectations ! Thanks, Bob S. bought mine from B and H a few weeks ago came with firmware 1.00, upgraded to 1.11 from Pentax. I thought the sensor was slightly titlted, it seemed that all images were tilted, but careful testing revealed the sensor is OK, it was just a false alarm. i recommend shooting a surface such as bathroom floor with small tiles, and make sure you point the camera perpendicullar and have a symmetric tile pattarn in the vewifinder. the image was the OK, no tilt. I did not manage to print anything yet, and I also don't have a good prime (I use a 28-70 f/4 zoom), but so far i was happy. will get a better idea of the real performance of this camera once I get a good prime and print a few images. I'd say go for it, but again it's your money, do as you want |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax *ist D
BobS notes:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. Since I already have 3 other Pentax camera's and a few lenses in my collection (which can be used on the *ist), it makes economical sense to go with this camera. But... any real-world gotcha's (reliability, parts falling off, etc.) that only show up after having used it for awhile - any regrets? Just a novice photographer with high expectations ! It's a delight. Forget the sharpness issues. Those are because very little sharpening is done in-camera (I keep it on the sharpest setting, do light sharpening when needed: it's fine, excellent shots). Sturdy feeling, I could actually wish it were a bit larger for my right hand. I got the kit lens, the 16-45, which seems to be excellent. Bought a 100mm Vivitar macro, which is pretty good, not nearly great. I'll be aiming for the 28-135mm Sigma macro next, I think. I've shot about 700 pix with mine. Takes a bit to get used to the framing after using a Minolta Dimage 7i with EVF for a couple years. I use it on manual most of the time, often with studio flash. It is easy to manipulate, set up, change, and most controls are easily accessible without going to the menu--the Minolta required either a wild combination of buttons and wheels or a trip to the menu. Two things, one a characteristic of autofocus lenses: I do not like small focus rings on lenses; the jog dial is too small. I've learned to rock my thumb to operate it, but it shouldn't require learning beyond other jog dials. Oh, yeah. The CF card goes in upside down, so is not as easy to get out as some. I rake mine out with my thumbnail after punching the release button. Charlie Self "Inanimate objects are classified scientifically into three major categories - those that don't work, those that break down and those that get lost." Russell Baker |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
BobS notes:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. Since I already have 3 other Pentax camera's and a few lenses in my collection (which can be used on the *ist), it makes economical sense to go with this camera. But... any real-world gotcha's (reliability, parts falling off, etc.) that only show up after having used it for awhile - any regrets? Just a novice photographer with high expectations ! It's a delight. Forget the sharpness issues. Those are because very little sharpening is done in-camera (I keep it on the sharpest setting, do light sharpening when needed: it's fine, excellent shots). Sturdy feeling, I could actually wish it were a bit larger for my right hand. I got the kit lens, the 16-45, which seems to be excellent. Bought a 100mm Vivitar macro, which is pretty good, not nearly great. I'll be aiming for the 28-135mm Sigma macro next, I think. I've shot about 700 pix with mine. Takes a bit to get used to the framing after using a Minolta Dimage 7i with EVF for a couple years. I use it on manual most of the time, often with studio flash. It is easy to manipulate, set up, change, and most controls are easily accessible without going to the menu--the Minolta required either a wild combination of buttons and wheels or a trip to the menu. Two things, one a characteristic of autofocus lenses: I do not like small focus rings on lenses; the jog dial is too small. I've learned to rock my thumb to operate it, but it shouldn't require learning beyond other jog dials. Oh, yeah. The CF card goes in upside down, so is not as easy to get out as some. I rake mine out with my thumbnail after punching the release button. Charlie Self "Inanimate objects are classified scientifically into three major categories - those that don't work, those that break down and those that get lost." Russell Baker |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax *ist D
"BobS" wrote:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. Since I already have 3 other Pentax camera's and a few lenses in my collection (which can be used on the *ist), it makes economical sense to go with this camera. But... any real-world gotcha's (reliability, parts falling off, etc.) that only show up after having used it for awhile - any regrets? Just a novice photographer with high expectations ! Thanks, Bob S. Bob Got my *istD in April after much agonising, and I'm completely satisfied with my choice. It does everything I want it to, and more. I've had terrrific fun going through my collection of sixteen old lenses, and it works with 'em all (with the 1.11 update). I think it's the only digital SLR that has full backward compatibility with ALL it's old family of lenses (including M42). Top marks to Pentax for that! I've just notched up 1400 shots, and if we'd had a better summer here in the UK it would have been double that. Like someone else has already said, forget about the sharpness issue - it's fully up to the best lenses you can buy. The CF card thing is just a quibble and just shows how desparate some reviewers are to find something to criticise. I 've not found it to be a problem. Having said all that, the new Cheapo version is due out soon (September?) so if cost is an issue then you might find it worth waiting for that. However, I'm wondering if that will still have full backwards lens compatibility, or if it will retain the *istD's bright pentaprism viewfinder. Cheers TonyH |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"BobS" wrote:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. Since I already have 3 other Pentax camera's and a few lenses in my collection (which can be used on the *ist), it makes economical sense to go with this camera. But... any real-world gotcha's (reliability, parts falling off, etc.) that only show up after having used it for awhile - any regrets? Just a novice photographer with high expectations ! Thanks, Bob S. Bob Got my *istD in April after much agonising, and I'm completely satisfied with my choice. It does everything I want it to, and more. I've had terrrific fun going through my collection of sixteen old lenses, and it works with 'em all (with the 1.11 update). I think it's the only digital SLR that has full backward compatibility with ALL it's old family of lenses (including M42). Top marks to Pentax for that! I've just notched up 1400 shots, and if we'd had a better summer here in the UK it would have been double that. Like someone else has already said, forget about the sharpness issue - it's fully up to the best lenses you can buy. The CF card thing is just a quibble and just shows how desparate some reviewers are to find something to criticise. I 've not found it to be a problem. Having said all that, the new Cheapo version is due out soon (September?) so if cost is an issue then you might find it worth waiting for that. However, I'm wondering if that will still have full backwards lens compatibility, or if it will retain the *istD's bright pentaprism viewfinder. Cheers TonyH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
BobS wrote:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've read plenty of reviews - all favorable and the pro's and con's about the sharpness and the CF card. The card slot is a little annoying, but not more than that. The sharpness is only an issue if you shoot JPEG or TIFF, because the camera does the processing in that case. A little extra sharpening in Photoshop is the remedy. If you shoot RAW, which gives you much more control, the computer does the processing and the sharpening. In other words; if you use Adobe CameraRAW to open the RAW files, the sharpness should be no different than it is for other digital cameras. I've blown up Pentax *istD images to 60 x 80 cm on my Epson 7600, and the results are impressive. -- Johan W. Elzenga johanatjohanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.nl/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"BobS" wrote:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've been using one for about 6 months now. Very, very pleased with it. Solid construction and excellent image quality. I just did a job for SuperbikePlanet.com with it - images online at http://www.robertstech.com/mid02004.htm If you have any specific questions email me or ask the Pentax mailing list (www.pdml.net), where there are lots of ist-D users. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"BobS" wrote:
About ready to make the jump to the Pentax *ist D but would like to get a couple of real world comments from those that own one already or have used it. I've been using one for about 6 months now. Very, very pleased with it. Solid construction and excellent image quality. I just did a job for SuperbikePlanet.com with it - images online at http://www.robertstech.com/mid02004.htm If you have any specific questions email me or ask the Pentax mailing list (www.pdml.net), where there are lots of ist-D users. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
: Having said all that, the new Cheapo version is due out soon
: (September?) so if cost is an issue then you might find it worth : waiting for that. However, I'm wondering if that will still have full : backwards lens compatibility, or if it will retain the *istD's bright : pentaprism viewfinder. : Cheers : TonyH Anybody heard anything more about the Cheapo version? I heard the announcement of an announcement a few months ago, but haven't heard any speculation since then. I would hope that they use the same or better sensor, retain the AA-compatible batteries, and just dummy-down the software a bit. I've used P&S digicams enough to realize that for the most part I'm planning on using it as a "digital light-proof box" to hold lenses. Most of the "features" on the digital cameras are gear towards JPEG shooters. Shoot in RAW, focus/compose correctly, use spot-metering, and exposure hold, and make sure the histogram doesn't blow out. Anything else you can fix in post-processing. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering Ph.D. Graduate Student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pentax Lens Adapters for the Sigma SD10 | Steven M. Scharf | Digital Photography | 1 | July 14th 04 05:30 PM |
Pentax P30T vs. P30N? | Jorge Prediguez | Digital Photography | 2 | July 2nd 04 04:18 AM |
Pentax P30T vs. P30N? | Tom Roth | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | July 2nd 04 04:18 AM |
Pentax camera remote codes for Nevo (PocketPC) | Chris Knight | Digital Photography | 0 | June 25th 04 12:07 AM |
Pentax Spotmeter III versus Spotmeter V | Phil Glaser | Large Format Photography Equipment | 1 | May 21st 04 05:17 PM |