A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Should all smokers be taken out and shot?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 9th 10, 12:17 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:56:34 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

I picked up a prime lens today, an older used one. I noticed the lens
had a light blue coating, which was odd as this prime's coatings are
usually brown-purple. At home, I gave the lens a swipe with a lens
tissue, and it looked like part of the coating "rubbed off." Turns
out, the lens was covered in a layer of tobacco smoke residue. The
whole lens was coated with it. When I cleaned the entire front
element surface, sure enough, the correct coating colour was revealed.
It took an hour to clean the thing. Luckily, the inside and the back
of the lens were ok, likely because it was inside the camera body.
I'm glad I didn't have to see the camera. But I've seen this before
on optics. How can anyone do this to a camera?


How you ask?

Because it's THEIR camera.

They bought and paid for it and how they use and treat it is their
choice just as how you use and treat your camera is your choice.

Do you have a problem with free choice?
  #2  
Old August 9th 10, 01:41 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
N[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 362
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?


wrote in message
...
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:56:34 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

I picked up a prime lens today, an older used one. I noticed the lens
had a light blue coating, which was odd as this prime's coatings are
usually brown-purple. At home, I gave the lens a swipe with a lens
tissue, and it looked like part of the coating "rubbed off." Turns
out, the lens was covered in a layer of tobacco smoke residue. The
whole lens was coated with it. When I cleaned the entire front
element surface, sure enough, the correct coating colour was revealed.
It took an hour to clean the thing. Luckily, the inside and the back
of the lens were ok, likely because it was inside the camera body.
I'm glad I didn't have to see the camera. But I've seen this before
on optics. How can anyone do this to a camera?


How you ask?

Because it's THEIR camera.

They bought and paid for it and how they use and treat it is their
choice just as how you use and treat your camera is your choice.

Do you have a problem with free choice?


If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.


--
N

  #3  
Old August 9th 10, 01:42 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Outing Trolls is FUN![_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 359
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:56:34 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

I picked up a prime lens today, an older used one. I noticed the lens
had a light blue coating, which was odd as this prime's coatings are
usually brown-purple. At home, I gave the lens a swipe with a lens
tissue, and it looked like part of the coating "rubbed off." Turns
out, the lens was covered in a layer of tobacco smoke residue. The
whole lens was coated with it. When I cleaned the entire front
element surface, sure enough, the correct coating colour was revealed.
It took an hour to clean the thing. Luckily, the inside and the back
of the lens were ok, likely because it was inside the camera body.
I'm glad I didn't have to see the camera. But I've seen this before
on optics. How can anyone do this to a camera?


How you ask?

Because it's THEIR camera.

They bought and paid for it and how they use and treat it is their
choice just as how you use and treat your camera is your choice.

Do you have a problem with free choice?


If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.


In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?

  #4  
Old August 9th 10, 01:44 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
N[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 362
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?


"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:


If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.


In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?


Have you ever sold a house?

--
N

  #5  
Old August 9th 10, 01:47 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Outing Trolls is FUN![_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 359
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" wrote:


"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:


If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.


In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?


Have you ever sold a house?


Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred
remains and land if I want.

Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?"

  #6  
Old August 9th 10, 04:44 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
GregS[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 158
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

In article , Rich wrote:
On Aug 9, 8:47=A0am, Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" wrote:

"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:


If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.


In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?


Have you ever sold a house?


Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred
remains and land if I want.

Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?"


Even if it isn't a requirement to clean it, you are required to inform
the buyer if something is going to intefere with the enjoyment or use
of the property, like the presence of black mold. At least you are in
Canada, I don't know about the U.S.


Most all houses have mold.

greg
  #7  
Old August 9th 10, 05:03 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

On 2010-08-09 08:44:46 -0700, (GregS) said:

In article
,
Rich wrote:
On Aug 9, 8:47=A0am, Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" wrote:

"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:

If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.

In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?

Have you ever sold a house?

Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred
remains and land if I want.

Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?"


Even if it isn't a requirement to clean it, you are required to inform
the buyer if something is going to intefere with the enjoyment or use
of the property, like the presence of black mold. At least you are in
Canada, I don't know about the U.S.


Most all houses have mold.

greg


Where do you live?
Mold is the least of my problems in my hot and dry local climate.

Cleaning the house before sale, is not a requirement, but it might be a
good idea in what is a buyers market. Though some foreclosure sales of
trashed homes have to be made with damage disclosures or the selling
bank can have liability issues.

....and disclosure laws apply in California, and I am sure they do in
the other states.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #8  
Old August 9th 10, 05:40 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
GregS[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 158
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

In article 2010080909032243658-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote:
On 2010-08-09 08:44:46 -0700, (GregS) said:

In article
,
Rich wrote:
On Aug 9, 8:47=A0am, Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" wrote:

"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:

If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.

In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?

Have you ever sold a house?

Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred
remains and land if I want.

Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?"

Even if it isn't a requirement to clean it, you are required to inform
the buyer if something is going to intefere with the enjoyment or use
of the property, like the presence of black mold. At least you are in
Canada, I don't know about the U.S.


Most all houses have mold.

greg


Where do you live?
Mold is the least of my problems in my hot and dry local climate.


I used to live in Barstow, I'm sure you could find just a little under a sink
or someplace like that. I'm just saying most. The relative humidity was always higher
inside the house. What about those swamp coolers?

Cleaning the house before sale, is not a requirement, but it might be a
good idea in what is a buyers market. Though some foreclosure sales of
trashed homes have to be made with damage disclosures or the selling
bank can have liability issues.


Inspecting a house is a requirment of any sane individual.

....and disclosure laws apply in California, and I am sure they do in
the other states.


No, inspection is not required to sell a house here.
Disclosure yes, whatever is listed on the forms.

greg
  #9  
Old August 9th 10, 05:45 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
GregS[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 158
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

In article , (GregS) wrote:
In article 2010080909032243658-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck
wrote:
On 2010-08-09 08:44:46 -0700,
(GregS) said:

In article
,
Rich wrote:
On Aug 9, 8:47=A0am, Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" wrote:

"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" wrote:

If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating.

In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?

Have you ever sold a house?

Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred
remains and land if I want.

Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?"

Even if it isn't a requirement to clean it, you are required to inform
the buyer if something is going to intefere with the enjoyment or use
of the property, like the presence of black mold. At least you are in
Canada, I don't know about the U.S.

Most all houses have mold.

greg


Where do you live?
Mold is the least of my problems in my hot and dry local climate.



Are you required to report sand builup ??
Sand is bad for your lungs.

I like the sweet smell of desert sand after a rainfall !!

A normal house inspection will not reveal everything.
I installed new windows last year. The old wooden windows
looked fine. Ripping out the frame revealed 60 years of moisture
seeping through wood to form some mold.
Some of the fiberglas was darkened. You would find this with any old house.

greg

I used to live in Barstow, I'm sure you could find just a little under a sink
or someplace like that. I'm just saying most. The relative humidity was always
higher
inside the house. What about those swamp coolers?

Cleaning the house before sale, is not a requirement, but it might be a
good idea in what is a buyers market. Though some foreclosure sales of
trashed homes have to be made with damage disclosures or the selling
bank can have liability issues.


Inspecting a house is a requirment of any sane individual.

....and disclosure laws apply in California, and I am sure they do in
the other states.


No, inspection is not required to sell a house here.
Disclosure yes, whatever is listed on the forms.

greg

  #10  
Old August 9th 10, 06:05 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Allen[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

GregS wrote:
snip

Most all houses have mold.

greg


Did you mean moldING?
Allen
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should all smokers be taken out and shot? Outing Trolls is FUN![_5_] Digital SLR Cameras 2 June 7th 11 08:06 AM
Should all smokers be taken out and shot? ray Digital SLR Cameras 11 August 10th 10 02:10 PM
Should all smokers be taken out and shot? tony cooper Digital SLR Cameras 2 August 8th 10 09:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.