If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"Savageduck" wrote: On 2009-09-09 17:24:27 -0700, Rich said: On Sep 9, 8:10 pm, Rich wrote: Ooops! Some moire seen in this sample image (see grey cinched flag on right hand side). http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/le...1070505_aw.jpg Actually it is quite obvious, and disconcerting. (BTW it is an umbrella not a flag) And the corners are mush and vignetted* (especially noticeable in the upper and lower left corners). You'd be better off with a Stigma 12-24 on a 5D2. ...and some CA as well. If there is software in the camera to deal with the really really tough problem of aliasing (would this image have been worse without that) you'd say they could have fixed the CA and the vignetting. *: Even if the tilted microlenses on the sensor work, the near-symmetric wide angle lenses used on rangefinder cameras have about a stop more vignetting than retrofocus lenses. Landscape types who care about their images use center filters on such lenses. -- Hans |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne
said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
C J Campbell wrote:
On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... The Leica R system had many absolutely world-class teles. They are still preferred by many nature photographers. Unfortunately, Leica in their great wisdom have terminated the system. There are many R users waiting to see if Leica keeps their promise of providing an "adequate" solution for using those lenses on a digital body... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
Rol_Lei Nut wrote:
C J Campbell wrote: On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... The Leica R system had many absolutely world-class teles. They are still preferred by many nature photographers. Unfortunately, Leica in their great wisdom have terminated the system. Leica would have happily kept "R" up. OTOH, the shareholders didn't see even mediocre cashflow v. the product costs. There are many R users waiting to see if Leica keeps their promise of providing an "adequate" solution for using those lenses on a digital body... I hope they have good breathing rhythm. I suspected with the recent hoopla over the "2009.09.09 @ 09:00" they would have and R9MkII announcement, alas... |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
C J Campbell wrote:
On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... Rangefinders (not just Leica) have rarely had long lenses. For one, large lenses can obstruct the viewfinder, ficus is difficult and the viewfinder would need significant magnification to make framing (and focus?) possible. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
On 2009-09-15 13:32:18 -0700, Alan Browne
said: C J Campbell wrote: On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... Rangefinders (not just Leica) have rarely had long lenses. For one, large lenses can obstruct the viewfinder, ficus is difficult and the viewfinder would need significant magnification to make framing (and focus?) possible. Yeah. For all the raving about the advantages of rangefinder cameras, people sometimes forget that the SLR has its advantages, too. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
... [] Rangefinders (not just Leica) have rarely had long lenses. For one, large lenses can obstruct the viewfinder, ficus is difficult and the viewfinder would need significant magnification to make framing (and focus?) possible. Of course, now digital rangefinders could use the LCD for framing, and contrast detect auto-focus.... David |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
C J Campbell wrote:
On 2009-09-15 13:32:18 -0700, Alan Browne said: C J Campbell wrote: On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... Rangefinders (not just Leica) have rarely had long lenses. For one, large lenses can obstruct the viewfinder, ficus is difficult and the viewfinder would need significant magnification to make framing (and focus?) possible. Yeah. For all the raving about the advantages of rangefinder cameras, people sometimes forget that the SLR has its advantages, too. The market sorted that out 30 years ago which essentially drove RF's (at least the successful ones) to the higher end of that niche. Still, RF's are a favourite of many journalists (combat, travel mags, nat-geo and so on). |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
John A. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:32:18 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: C J Campbell wrote: On 2009-09-09 16:06:54 -0700, Alan Browne said: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090909leicam9.asp Some day I am going to get me one of those. Seriously. Right after the 200-400 VR, the 600 VR, and the second D3x body. Yep. Sure, I would love the smaller body size, the light weight, the selection of smaller lenses (even pancake lenses -- are you listening, Nikon?), and just the coolness of having a Leica. But Leica does not have the long lenses I need for much of my photography. Still.... Rangefinders (not just Leica) have rarely had long lenses. For one, large lenses can obstruct the viewfinder, ficus is difficult and the viewfinder would need significant magnification to make framing (and focus?) possible. I fail to see how any particular tree species could give it more problems than others. I smoeimets mkae tpoys. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
M9 - Full Frame - 18 Mpix - IR filter
David J Taylor wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... [] Rangefinders (not just Leica) have rarely had long lenses. For one, large lenses can obstruct the viewfinder, ficus is difficult and the viewfinder would need significant magnification to make framing (and focus?) possible. Of course, now digital rangefinders could use the LCD for framing, and contrast detect auto-focus.... Good point ... but then would they be rangefinders - or just Oly 4/3 variants? ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Full Frame vs APS-C | measekite | Digital Photography | 29 | September 21st 08 10:54 AM |
Full frame or crop? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 7 | April 15th 07 07:08 AM |
Why full-frame? | Gregory L. Hansen | 35mm Photo Equipment | 72 | December 5th 05 09:44 AM |
Is 4 Mpix camera just as good as 5 Mpix when available light is the limiting factor? | Woody | Digital Photography | 17 | September 26th 04 06:44 PM |