A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 3rd 09, 10:39 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
SPAM.WATCH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?


"Me" wrote in message
...
RichA wrote:
I don't think so. For resolution freaks, this will be welcome,
provided it doesn't cost $2500. This is apparently a cheaper 5D II.
Now, the only question is, will Nikon facing two high res camera at
low prices from Canon bring out their own?
One good thing, the lenses don't need to be hyper-expensive like for
the FF cameras in order to properly support this chip.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09...os7d.asp#specs



It's /not/ a cheaper 5DII. You clearly haven't used a 5DII - or you'd
know that.

True, it's a more expensive APS-C replacement for the 50D... Seems to be a
Pentax K7D clone



  #2  
Old September 4th 09, 02:25 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Doug McDonald[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 104
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?



It's /not/ a cheaper 5DII. You clearly haven't used a 5DII - or you'd
know that.



What is is an 8Hz burst camera. I have my doubts whether the other features
are really all that likely to really truly work. For example,
all the focus points in the world won't help unless the one you actually
use is small enough that you critical subject area is larger than it is.

Doug McDonald
  #3  
Old September 4th 09, 03:49 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Miles Bader[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 173
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?

Doug McDonald writes:
What is is an 8Hz burst camera


So who is it that uses these super fast picture-taking speeds? Is it
just sports photogs?

-Miles

--
Alliance, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have
their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pockets that they cannot
separately plunder a third.
  #4  
Old September 4th 09, 04:26 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 796
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?

Miles Bader wrote:
Doug McDonald writes:
What is is an 8Hz burst camera


So who is it that uses these super fast picture-taking speeds? Is it
just sports photogs?

No. There a plenty of other uses, in wildlife/nature, shooting fashion
on the catwalk etc, aviation/cars, or "merely" taking photos of your
kids playing in the back yard.
As a general rule, the cameras are also faster, more responsive, and
from my experience more accurate (AF) when shooting static subjects.
Sometimes that doesn't matter at all, sometimes it matters a lot.
  #5  
Old September 4th 09, 01:58 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
mcdonaldREMOVE TO ACTUALLY REACH [email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 243
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?

Me wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Doug McDonald writes:
What is is an 8Hz burst camera


So who is it that uses these super fast picture-taking speeds? Is it
just sports photogs?

No. There a plenty of other uses, in wildlife/nature, shooting fashion
on the catwalk etc, aviation/cars, or "merely" taking photos of your
kids playing in the back yard.
As a general rule, the cameras are also faster, more responsive, and
from my experience more accurate (AF) when shooting static subjects.
Sometimes that doesn't matter at all, sometimes it matters a lot.


On my vacation I used my lowly 30D to take pictures, in burst mode,
of people diving into a pool near Angel Falls. The pictures
drew oohs and aahs from the subjects. They were completely unaware that
still cameras could do that. And an 8 Hz camera would have
gotten in some cases a better "best shot".

I've also had some success using burst mode with swimming beavers.

Doug McDonald

  #6  
Old September 4th 09, 02:26 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Ron Recer[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?


"mcdonaldREMOVE TO ACTUALLY REACH wrote in message
...
Me wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Doug McDonald writes:
What is is an 8Hz burst camera

So who is it that uses these super fast picture-taking speeds? Is it
just sports photogs?

No. There a plenty of other uses, in wildlife/nature, shooting fashion on
the catwalk etc, aviation/cars, or "merely" taking photos of your kids
playing in the back yard.
As a general rule, the cameras are also faster, more responsive, and from
my experience more accurate (AF) when shooting static subjects. Sometimes
that doesn't matter at all, sometimes it matters a lot.


On my vacation I used my lowly 30D to take pictures, in burst mode,
of people diving into a pool near Angel Falls. The pictures
drew oohs and aahs from the subjects. They were completely unaware that
still cameras could do that. And an 8 Hz camera would have
gotten in some cases a better "best shot".

I've also had some success using burst mode with swimming beavers.

Doug McDonald

I use it on my 40D all the time for wildlife shots. Usually I take 3-4 shot
bursts, but at times I take shots until the buffer is full. Wildlife won't
pose on command and if you wait for what you think is the 'perfect' shot the
pose will be different by the time you press the shutter button.

I recently took some close-ups (less than 30 feet away) of black bears
stripping berries off of bushes. Using the burst mode I got a few shots
where berries are visible on the bears tongue before disappearing in his
mouth. I would have never got those shots using the single shot mode!

Ron


  #7  
Old September 5th 09, 03:34 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Wilba[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 572
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?

Doug McDonald wrote:

On my vacation I used my lowly 30D to take pictures, in burst mode,
of people diving into a pool near Angel Falls. The pictures drew oohs
and aahs from the subjects. They were completely unaware that still
cameras could do that. And an 8 Hz camera would have gotten in
some cases a better "best shot".

I've also had some success using burst mode with swimming beavers.


I'm surprised you didn't get arrested for that.


  #8  
Old September 5th 09, 04:00 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Floyd L. Davidson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,138
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?

"Wilba" wrote:
Doug McDonald wrote:

On my vacation I used my lowly 30D to take pictures, in burst mode,
of people diving into a pool near Angel Falls. The pictures drew oohs
and aahs from the subjects. They were completely unaware that still
cameras could do that. And an 8 Hz camera would have gotten in
some cases a better "best shot".

I've also had some success using burst mode with swimming beavers.


I'm surprised you didn't get arrested for that.


Cardiac arrest...

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
  #9  
Old September 5th 09, 05:56 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Neil Harrington[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 663
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?


"Wilba" wrote in message
...
Doug McDonald wrote:

On my vacation I used my lowly 30D to take pictures, in burst mode,
of people diving into a pool near Angel Falls. The pictures drew oohs
and aahs from the subjects. They were completely unaware that still
cameras could do that. And an 8 Hz camera would have gotten in
some cases a better "best shot".

I've also had some success using burst mode with swimming beavers.


I'm surprised you didn't get arrested for that.


I don't thiink he means that kind of beaver.


  #10  
Old September 5th 09, 08:24 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
mcdonaldREMOVE TO ACTUALLY REACH [email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 243
Default 18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far?



Doug McDonald wrote:


I've also had some success using burst mode with swimming beavers.


somebody replied:

I'm surprised you didn't get arrested for that.


Neil Harrington retorted:

I don't thiink he means that kind of beaver.



You only need fear these beavers, or being near them, if
you are a tree. In that case, be afraid, be very very afraid.
They are in full-scale building mode.

Terminally cute, but unfortunately in dire need of ISO 1600 and
lots of Noise Ninja.

Doug
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far? Giftzwerg Digital SLR Cameras 125 September 17th 09 01:14 AM
18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far? Alan Browne Digital SLR Cameras 25 September 4th 09 03:40 AM
18 megapixels on a 1.6x crop camera - Has Canon gone too far? Alan Browne Digital Photography 13 September 3rd 09 08:14 PM
FA or FS: Canon A300 Digital Camera***3.2 Megapixels jfigueredo Digital Photo Equipment For Sale 1 January 21st 04 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.