If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What is best camera settings to make an image of a document?
I want to photograph an 8 1/2x11 paper document
so that I can reproduce it on my photo printer. That is, I simply want to make a good copy of any paper document, and store that JPG for future use - should I need additional paper copies. I have a Canon A510 (the newer A75), so I have a lot of manual settings to choose from. If anyone knows of a web page that gives such settings and advice - please post it here. THANKS, Gene |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene" wrote in message ... I want to photograph an 8 1/2x11 paper document so that I can reproduce it on my photo printer. That is, I simply want to make a good copy of any paper document, and store that JPG for future use - should I need additional paper copies. I have a Canon A510 (the newer A75), so I have a lot of manual settings to choose from. If anyone knows of a web page that gives such settings and advice - please post it here. THANKS, Gene Buy a cheap scanner |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:48:06 GMT, "Gene" wrote:
I want to photograph an 8 1/2x11 paper document so that I can reproduce it on my photo printer. That is, I simply want to make a good copy of any paper document, and store that JPG for future use - should I need additional paper copies. I have a Canon A510 (the newer A75), so I have a lot of manual settings to choose from. If anyone knows of a web page that gives such settings and advice - please post it here. To give you an idea, a fax machine scans at 200dpi, each pixel is either fully black or fully white. 2200 x 1700 = 3.7Mpix. And a fax is a questionable quality of document copy. Use the highest resolution your camera supports. Storage space is so cheap now, you'd be crazy wasting your time shooting at any lower resolution. Set up a jig that holds the camera over the document aimed at the center at a 90deg angle from the surface. Allow suitable distance to get even lighting of the document and shoot at the sharpest aperture for your lens (probably around f/8 or f/11). Store images as medium or high quality JPEG, but keep the resolution at it's best. Quality-wize, You will not be able to beat what a cheap flat-bed scanner can achieve for this same task. -- Owamanga! http://www.pbase.com/owamanga |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gene wrote:
I want to photograph an 8 1/2x11 paper document so that I can reproduce it on my photo printer. That is, I simply want to make a good copy of any paper document, and store that JPG for future use - should I need additional paper copies. I have a Canon A510 (the newer A75), so I have a lot of manual settings to choose from. If anyone knows of a web page that gives such settings and advice - please post it here. THANKS, Gene That is what scanners are for. If you really want to do the job with your camera set the exposure and WB based on the actual lighting. Using a gray card will help. -- Joseph Meehan 26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene" writes:
I want to photograph an 8 1/2x11 paper document so that I can reproduce it on my photo printer. That is, I simply want to make a good copy of any paper document, and store that JPG for future use - should I need additional paper copies. I have a Canon A510 (the newer A75), so I have a lot of manual settings to choose from. If anyone knows of a web page that gives such settings and advice - please post it here. The auto exposure is very likely to cause the white of the paper to come out rather gray. I'd just use manual exposure and check the histogram; when the paper gets right near the top, that's a good enough exposure, and then I'd shoot all the pages I wanted at that exposure. You could instead get the same effect with auto-exposure and probably about a +2 exposure compensation. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I've done it before, but a scanner works better. Just shoot the document at
the proper exposure with decent lighting. You can even do it on the floor in a well lit room, as long as the document is held flat and the lighting is even. Then, use your software to increase the contrast so that the printing is truly black on white. "Gene" wrote in message ... I want to photograph an 8 1/2x11 paper document so that I can reproduce it on my photo printer. That is, I simply want to make a good copy of any paper document, and store that JPG for future use - should I need additional paper copies. I have a Canon A510 (the newer A75), so I have a lot of manual settings to choose from. If anyone knows of a web page that gives such settings and advice - please post it here. THANKS, Gene |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:43:59 GMT, Owamanga
wrote: shoot at the sharpest aperture for your lens (probably around f/8 or f/11) Firstly, aperture has no bearing on the sharpness of a photo. Secondly, a lens is at its optical "best" when used at the midrange of whatever aperture settings are available for the lens. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Instead of simply telling Gene to use a scanner, why not just answer
his question. Perhaps he has a situation that actually warrants the use of a camera? Perhaps Gene's got craploads of pages to copy and waiting to scan every page would drive most people to drink; it would certain push me off the deep end. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
secheese wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:43:59 GMT, Owamanga wrote: shoot at the sharpest aperture for your lens (probably around f/8 or f/11) Firstly, aperture has no bearing on the sharpness of a photo. Secondly, a lens is at its optical "best" when used at the midrange of whatever aperture settings are available for the lens. I disagree. Most lenses are much sharper at f/8, really fancy lenses might be better at f/11. My D70 setup with a 28-200 (not fancy) goes from f/3.5 to f/36 & I doubt f/20 looks better than f/8. I know f/8 is way sharper than the extremes. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:08:09 -0800, paul wrote:
secheese wrote: On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:43:59 GMT, Owamanga wrote: shoot at the sharpest aperture for your lens (probably around f/8 or f/11) Firstly, aperture has no bearing on the sharpness of a photo. Secondly, a lens is at its optical "best" when used at the midrange of whatever aperture settings are available for the lens. I disagree. Most lenses are much sharper at f/8, really fancy lenses might be better at f/11. My D70 setup with a 28-200 (not fancy) goes from f/3.5 to f/36 & I doubt f/20 looks better than f/8. I know f/8 is way sharper than the extremes. It's probably some anal use of the word 'sharp' he has a problem with. It's not sharp enough to stab anyone with... -- Owamanga! http://www.pbase.com/owamanga |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Image Stabilized Digital Camera on a boat | junktin | Digital Photography | 21 | March 13th 05 02:55 AM |
8Mp Digital The Theoretical 35mm Quality Equivelant | Matt | Digital Photography | 1144 | December 17th 04 09:48 PM |
perspective w/ 35mm lenses? | PrincePete01 | Digital Photography | 373 | August 10th 04 02:21 PM |
Image intensifiers | Richard Knoppow | In The Darkroom | 8 | July 31st 04 04:38 AM |