Adobe being punished for predatory marketing tactics

On 10/1/2010 5:10 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 10-10-01 0:01 , peter wrote:
On 9/30/2010 11:35 PM, David J. Littleboy wrote:
wrote:
On 9/30/2010 9:42 PM, David J. Littleboy wrote:
"Alan wrote:
On 10-09-25 22:33 , Peter wrote:

I was very happy with CS3 and upgraded only because CS5 has a
feature I
like. (content aware fill.) for me it was worth the $200 cost of the
upgrade

That's just it - that feature and the few others are not worth
$200 to
me - at least not yet.

The only thing to watch out for is that Adobe won't let you upgrade
from
much older versions. So if you think you are going to continue to need
PS,
you need to upgrade occasionally. Also, so many of the discussions of
image
processing on the net assume PS, that you need to be reasonably up to
date.


I buy to use, not discuss.

If you read what other people write, you might learn something...

Only when they know what they are talking about.

That assumes that you know enough about what they are talking about.

And they are not creating previously non-existent facts.

--
Peter