A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » Film & Labs
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fujifilm B&W film question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 24th 05, 09:48 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head
and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration."

That's because by trial and error this has proved itself....

  #12  
Old March 28th 05, 03:09 PM
F.C. Trevor Gale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greetings;

"Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7 for
example? This defies even logic!

"Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all things
photographic? Same comment.

Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of the
photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3
paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth
vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic process.

wrote:
"The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head
and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration."

That's because by trial and error this has proved itself....


  #13  
Old March 28th 05, 03:41 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings;

"Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7

for
example? This defies even logic!


Not what I said.


"Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all

things
photographic? Same comment.


Minor White, Zone System Manual:

"With roll film use the #3 contrast grade of enlarging paper, or its
equivalent. With sheet film standardize on the #2 medium contrast
grade." (p. 74)

"As was said the #2 contrast grade of projection paper is standard
with sheet film and the #3 with roll film. The first is chosen because
its contrast is midway between the harder and softer contrast grades.
The #3 contrast grade is consistent with the general practice for small
negatives." (p. 77)

Now, what were you saying?


Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of

the
photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3


paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth
vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic

process.

wrote:
"The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head
and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast

filtration."

That's because by trial and error this has proved itself....


  #14  
Old March 28th 05, 03:41 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings;

"Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7

for
example? This defies even logic!


Not what I said.


"Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all

things
photographic? Same comment.


Minor White, Zone System Manual:

"With roll film use the #3 contrast grade of enlarging paper, or its
equivalent. With sheet film standardize on the #2 medium contrast
grade." (p. 74)

"As was said the #2 contrast grade of projection paper is standard
with sheet film and the #3 with roll film. The first is chosen because
its contrast is midway between the harder and softer contrast grades.
The #3 contrast grade is consistent with the general practice for small
negatives." (p. 77)

Now, what were you saying?


Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of

the
photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3


paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth
vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic

process.

wrote:
"The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head
and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast

filtration."

That's because by trial and error this has proved itself....


  #15  
Old March 28th 05, 04:01 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings;

"Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7

for
example? This defies even logic!


No, I didn't say that.

"Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all

things
photographic? Same comment.


No, for roll film.

I quote:

"With roll film use the #3 contrast grade of enlarging paper, or its
equivalent. With sheet film standardize on the #2 medium contrast
grade." (p. 74)

"As was said the #2 contrast grade of projection paper is standard
with sheet film and the #3 with roll film. The first is chosen because
its contrast is midway between the harder and softer contrast grades.
The #3 contrast grade is consistent with the general practice for small
negatives." (p77)

Minor White, Zone System Manual

OK, now what were you saying?

Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of

the
photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3


paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth
vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic

process.

wrote:
"The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head
and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast

filtration."

That's because by trial and error this has proved itself....


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs KM Medium Format Photography Equipment 724 December 7th 04 09:58 AM
Upcoming Film Price Wars - Kodak vs. Fuji... Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 63 October 24th 04 06:07 AM
Question on Polaroid 35mm Film Made by Agfa eb Film & Labs 2 August 3rd 04 11:02 PM
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film Q.G. de Bakker Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 July 3rd 04 05:58 PM
Jobo Film loaders with base for 120 film question! Nick Zentena In The Darkroom 2 January 24th 04 10:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.