If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head
and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration." That's because by trial and error this has proved itself.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Greetings;
"Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7 for example? This defies even logic! "Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all things photographic? Same comment. Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of the photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3 paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic process. wrote: "The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration." That's because by trial and error this has proved itself.... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
F.C. Trevor Gale wrote: Greetings; "Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7 for example? This defies even logic! Not what I said. "Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all things photographic? Same comment. Minor White, Zone System Manual: "With roll film use the #3 contrast grade of enlarging paper, or its equivalent. With sheet film standardize on the #2 medium contrast grade." (p. 74) "As was said the #2 contrast grade of projection paper is standard with sheet film and the #3 with roll film. The first is chosen because its contrast is midway between the harder and softer contrast grades. The #3 contrast grade is consistent with the general practice for small negatives." (p. 77) Now, what were you saying? Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of the photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3 paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic process. wrote: "The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration." That's because by trial and error this has proved itself.... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
F.C. Trevor Gale wrote: Greetings; "Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7 for example? This defies even logic! Not what I said. "Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all things photographic? Same comment. Minor White, Zone System Manual: "With roll film use the #3 contrast grade of enlarging paper, or its equivalent. With sheet film standardize on the #2 medium contrast grade." (p. 74) "As was said the #2 contrast grade of projection paper is standard with sheet film and the #3 with roll film. The first is chosen because its contrast is midway between the harder and softer contrast grades. The #3 contrast grade is consistent with the general practice for small negatives." (p. 77) Now, what were you saying? Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of the photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3 paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic process. wrote: "The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration." That's because by trial and error this has proved itself.... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
F.C. Trevor Gale wrote: Greetings; "Trial end error" has proven 35mm film to be better than 120 6 x 7 for example? This defies even logic! No, I didn't say that. "Trial and error" has proven use of grade 3 as a baseline for all things photographic? Same comment. No, for roll film. I quote: "With roll film use the #3 contrast grade of enlarging paper, or its equivalent. With sheet film standardize on the #2 medium contrast grade." (p. 74) "As was said the #2 contrast grade of projection paper is standard with sheet film and the #3 with roll film. The first is chosen because its contrast is midway between the harder and softer contrast grades. The #3 contrast grade is consistent with the general practice for small negatives." (p77) Minor White, Zone System Manual OK, now what were you saying? Michael, why not go and earn some serious money by advising all of the photo/film companies to immediately drop anything else except grade 3 paper and 35mm film. I'm sure they would be amazed by your in-depth vision of the realities of the requirements of the photographic process. wrote: "The troll only knows 35mm film, he only uses a condenser head and only advocates using grade 3 as a baseline contrast filtration." That's because by trial and error this has proved itself.... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
Upcoming Film Price Wars - Kodak vs. Fuji... | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 63 | October 24th 04 06:07 AM |
Question on Polaroid 35mm Film Made by Agfa | eb | Film & Labs | 2 | August 3rd 04 11:02 PM |
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film | Q.G. de Bakker | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 9 | July 3rd 04 05:58 PM |
Jobo Film loaders with base for 120 film question! | Nick Zentena | In The Darkroom | 2 | January 24th 04 10:05 PM |