If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
"George" wrote in message ... Delrin or nylon...you can buy sheets from MSC-Direct.com George, Since the original post asked for a material that is more stable than cherry, I wonder about the high thermal expansion of Delrin and nylon. No questions that you suggstions are close to wood in machinability. They are also several times higher in expansion than most wood and metal, and some plastics (nylon for sure) absorb a lot of moisture. The requirements were pretty loosely stated for sure. Any thoughts? PSsquare |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
In article , "PSsquare"
wrote: "George" wrote in message ... Delrin or nylon...you can buy sheets from MSC-Direct.com George, Since the original post asked for a material that is more stable than cherry, I wonder about the high thermal expansion of Delrin and nylon. No questions that you suggstions are close to wood in machinability. They are also several times higher in expansion than most wood and metal, and some plastics (nylon for sure) absorb a lot of moisture. The requirements were pretty loosely stated for sure. Any thoughts? Nylon absorbs a lot of moisture? See how ignorant I am. I thought plastics and nylon were virtually impervious to water. Monday I will go to our university materials research library and study up so that I don't have to pester you all. The requirements a to be stronger than cherrywood, as easy to cut as wood (even if it's harder to cut than cherry). It must be able to stand up to direct sunlight in hot weather without weakening (or weaping) and also stand up to temperatures of -20F with no greater possiblity of snapping than cherry. Dimensional changes due to moisture - well, no worse than cherry. Weight is not an issue. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
"jjs" wrote: The requirements a to be stronger than cherrywood, as easy to cut as wood (even if it's harder to cut than cherry). It must be able to stand up to direct sunlight in hot weather without weakening (or weaping) and also stand up to temperatures of -20F with no greater possiblity of snapping than cherry. Dimensional changes due to moisture - well, no worse than cherry. Weight is not an issue. Maple. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
"jjs" wrote in message
... In article , (Winfried Buechsenschuetz) wrote: (jjs) wrote in message ... If you can nudge me in the right direction, offline if it is appropriate, I would be quite greatful. You mentioned that your camera hardly has any flat surfaces. So I think it will take numerical controlled (NC or CNC) machines to manufacture your design. There are quite a few machine shops which do not manufacture any devices but only components for other companies, and they will be happy to receive such an order because it will bring them some money. [...] Yes, CNC shops are common. Unfortunately, I am going to make all of _two_ (maybe three) of these cameras and having a comercial shop make the parts would be hugely expensive. In any event, I'm still in the advanced prototype stage and can cut the parts at home until/if it proofs out. It may never make it past the hand-cut stage. FWIW, check out these folks: http://www.emachineshop.com Very cool business. They have made things for me that I've designed using their software. But in that case we were talking about dozens of copies of each item, not two of each. John, Thanks for that link! I've been looking for an effective way to prototype something I've been working on and it looks like this company may well be exactly what I need. Very cool. Sherman http://www.dunnamphoto.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
"jjs" wrote in message
... The requirements a to be stronger than cherrywood, as easy to cut as wood (even if it's harder to cut than cherry). It must be able to stand up to direct sunlight in hot weather without weakening (or weaping) and also stand up to temperatures of -20F with no greater possiblity of snapping than cherry. Dimensional changes due to moisture - well, no worse than cherry. Weight is not an issue. Fiberglassing makes wood impervious to moisture. They use that in exterior hulls of ocean going vessels. I'm guessing, but that seems to be pretty extreme duty. Sea kayaks are made from 1/8" cedar strips, glassed inside and out. Maybe a combination of fiberglassed wood and machined plastics for the mating surfaces. Or just plain fiberglass on carved foam cores... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
In article , "Sherman"
wrote: "jjs" wrote in message ... FWIW, check out these folks: http://www.emachineshop.com Very cool business. They have made things for me that I've designed using their software. But in that case we were talking about dozens of copies of each item, not two of each. John, Thanks for that link! I've been looking for an effective way to prototype something I've been working on and it looks like this company may well be exactly what I need. Very cool. The entrepeneur is a very good programmer and machinist. The software is updated regularly and gets better every couple of weeks. If I may suggest that you put together a quick version of a part and run it through to the pricing stage. When you see the cost of one part (say, $120), then check the cost of 20 parts. Chances are good the total for the 20 parts is as little as $150. That's CNC. I love it when the software interrupts and says things like "If you reduce the number of splines, you will save money" or "you have two different sized holes. Make them the same and you will save money" or "You have exceeded the recommended span for this material. Try..." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
In article , "MikeWhy"
wrote: Fiberglassing makes wood impervious to moisture. They use that in exterior hulls of ocean going vessels. I'm guessing, but that seems to be pretty extreme duty. Sea kayaks are made from 1/8" cedar strips, glassed inside and out. Maybe a combination of fiberglassed wood and machined plastics for the mating surfaces. Or just plain fiberglass on carved foam cores... I appreciate the thought, Mike. Glass hulled ocean kayaks, yes. Love 'em. Good ones have an ideal combination of wood and glass. We have some kevlar, composites, wooden and glass boats here. This is the home of Winona Canoe. (Winona, Minnesota) My colleague's brother is the founder and owner. Composites rule. Back to the cameras - It uses relatively small parts, and fiberglass in this case is a huge nuisance to cut, and not strong on thin part edges. I, talked with our composites material engineer and they have nothing mass produced (eg; affordable) that works in this scale for prototyping. If this were a NASA project, I'd certainly have learned more and would have heard "make it so", but for my small, amateur needs, the correct composites are a dream. Thanks for the good words. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
EEEeeek!! I will backup that page, with credits to you of course, on the MF megasite. Let me know of any other pages which can/should be archived too! I would _really_ hate to see such great and inspiring homebrewing pages to be lost or not available... ============ Actually, Roger Hicks in an article in Brit. Jrnl of Photogr. some years ago (reprinted in his MF/LF handbook IIRC?) described a LF fisheye using the kiev 30mm lens as the optic and a thin body with leaf shutter and mounting for ground glass or film 4x5" holders. I like the idea, esp. since you should be able to dismount the lens when needed on say a Kiev 60 ;-) Much as I like the Walker Titan design ideas, the cost at $2k or so is problematic ;-) The cambo wide body only is still $1k. Since I am intending to use a surplus 90mm angulon ($100-ish in shutter ;-), it doesn't make sense to mount it on a body costing ten or twenty times as much ;-) Esp. since I don't need those shifting features ;-) But I would like something where a rollfilm back is an option (hence, on topic in MF NG). I still find it amazing that postcard folders of 100 years ago had front lens standard shifts etc. and covered 3+x5 1/2" rollfilm, folded into a jacket pocket; yet today, we can't find anything close ;-) and ;-( ;-) bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Machinist in the house?
Bob Monaghan wrote:
... Actually, Roger Hicks in an article in Brit. Jrnl of Photogr. some years ago (reprinted in his MF/LF handbook IIRC?) described a LF fisheye using the kiev 30mm lens as the optic and a thin body with leaf shutter and mounting for ground glass or film 4x5" holders. I like the idea, esp. since you should be able to dismount the lens when needed on say a Kiev 60 ;-) Such a hack was reported with pictures in the Finnish Kamera-lehti magazine. Essentially it was just a wooden box with 4x5" lens panel and film holder. Makes nice round images. One of the tricks was to mount the shutter backwards inside the camera, and use a cable release to trip it. -- Lassi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Because I feel obligated... | Al Denelsbeck | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | July 5th 04 04:14 PM |
it will loudly grasp in front of ugly old monoliths | PrestoET | APS Photographic Equipment | 0 | April 21st 04 07:53 PM |
Odd Omega DII Lamp House design - light leak possible? | Philip Wang | In The Darkroom | 4 | April 5th 04 05:25 AM |