FAB 5D2 GOES 3-D !

Annika1980 wrote:
A quick little 3-D Stereogram made today with the Fab 5D2:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/109141023/original
Cool - although I'm sure I've seen this one before. Did the
20D go stereo?
Back to this one - your exposure looks a bit funky to me -
1/250 @ F16, ISO800 for a bright sunny day seems to me like
it should be almost 2 stops overexposed, yet the photo
clearly isn't. Something doesn't seem right.

Doug Jewell wrote:
Annika1980 wrote:
A quick little 3-D Stereogram made today with the Fab 5D2:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/109141023/original
Cool - although I'm sure I've seen this one before. Did the
20D go stereo?
Back to this one - your exposure looks a bit funky to me -
1/250 @ F16, ISO800 for a bright sunny day seems to me like
it should be almost 2 stops overexposed, yet the photo
clearly isn't. Something doesn't seem right.

Global warming. The sun's getting darker in response. "Sunny 16" is "Sunny
8" now. Get used to it.

I think I've seen that shot before, too. Have you "stereoed" that thing
before, Bret?

--
Jeff R.

Doug Jewell wrote,on my timestamp of 13/02/2009 4:27 PM:

Back to this one - your exposure looks a bit funky to me - 1/250 @ F16,
ISO800 for a bright sunny day seems to me like it should be almost 2
stops overexposed, yet the photo clearly isn't. Something doesn't seem
right.

It's that pbase exif display thing again...

Annika1980 wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:27 am, Doug Jewell wrote:

Back to this one - your exposure looks a bit funky to me -
1/250 @ F16, ISO800 for a bright sunny day seems to me like
it should be almost 2 stops overexposed, yet the photo
clearly isn't. Something doesn't seem right.

Two words: Circular Polarizer
Yeah I wondered that, but thought it didn't look like a pol
was used - sky looked too even.

Doug Jewell wrote:
Annika1980 wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:27 am, Doug Jewell wrote:

Back to this one - your exposure looks a bit funky to me -
1/250 @ F16, ISO800 for a bright sunny day seems to me like
it should be almost 2 stops overexposed, yet the photo
clearly isn't. Something doesn't seem right.

Two words: Circular Polarizer
Yeah I wondered that, but thought it didn't look like a pol was used -
sky looked too even.

The sky DOES show color change with it being darkest in the upper right.

The amount of change also depends on where the light source is v. the
lens axis.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.