A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

High speed vs normal CF memory cards



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:00 AM
Sheldon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default High speed vs normal CF memory cards

Has anybody noticed a difference between the new high-speed Compact Flash
cards vs. the "normal" ones? Are they worth the extra bucks?

I have a Nikon D70, if that makes a difference.

Thanks,

Sheldon



  #2  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:14 AM
Proconsul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sheldon wrote:
Has anybody noticed a difference between the new high-speed Compact
Flash cards vs. the "normal" ones? Are they worth the extra bucks?


They are, IMO, worth the extra cost and in my experience are much faster
recording pix which cuts down the time between shots substantially....

I have a Nikon D70, if that makes a difference.


All cameras should benefit, IMO, from using faster cards...

PC


  #3  
Old February 3rd 05, 04:26 AM
Stacey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Proconsul wrote:

Sheldon wrote:
Has anybody noticed a difference between the new high-speed Compact
Flash cards vs. the "normal" ones? Are they worth the extra bucks?


They are, IMO, worth the extra cost and in my experience are much faster
recording pix which cuts down the time between shots substantially....

I have a Nikon D70, if that makes a difference.


All cameras should benefit, IMO, from using faster cards...



And if you have a firewire or USB 2.0 reader, shouldn't they also download
faster?

--

Stacey
  #4  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:06 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stacey wrote:
And if you have a firewire or USB 2.0 reader, shouldn't they also download
faster?


Apparently the D70 and 7D both suffer from a 2.0 interface that runs at 1.1
speeds...so a faster card won't help. Canon 20D behaves properly. Hopefully
both Nikon and K-M can fix this in a firmware upgrade.



--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  #5  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:24 PM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Browne wrote:
Stacey wrote:
And if you have a firewire or USB 2.0 reader, shouldn't they also
download faster?


Apparently the D70 and 7D both suffer from a 2.0 interface that runs
at 1.1 speeds...so a faster card won't help. Canon 20D behaves
properly. Hopefully both Nikon and K-M can fix this in a firmware
upgrade.


They certainly /can/ benefit if you put the cards in a faster reader.
Direct camera connections, though, may indeed be limited by the camera.

Cheers,
David


  #6  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:29 PM
David H. Lipman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes but you can use a SanDisk USB v2.0 Memory card Reader (or similar vendor) and you will
see the full benefit of the CF's speed. I use the SanDisk 6 -in- 1 USB v2.0 Card Reader and
SanDisk 1GB UltraII 60x speed cards.

--
Dave




"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
| Stacey wrote:
| And if you have a firewire or USB 2.0 reader, shouldn't they also download
| faster?
|
| Apparently the D70 and 7D both suffer from a 2.0 interface that runs at 1.1
| speeds...so a faster card won't help. Canon 20D behaves properly. Hopefully
| both Nikon and K-M can fix this in a firmware upgrade.
|
|
|
| --
| -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
| -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
| -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
| -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.


  #7  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:40 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David J Taylor wrote:

Alan Browne wrote:

Stacey wrote:

And if you have a firewire or USB 2.0 reader, shouldn't they also
download faster?


Apparently the D70 and 7D both suffer from a 2.0 interface that runs
at 1.1 speeds...so a faster card won't help. Canon 20D behaves
properly. Hopefully both Nikon and K-M can fix this in a firmware
upgrade.



They certainly /can/ benefit if you put the cards in a faster reader.
Direct camera connections, though, may indeed be limited by the camera.


I was speaking in terms of camera-to-computer. I didn't read the other post
carefully enough...

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  #8  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:41 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David H. Lipman wrote:

Yes but you can use a SanDisk USB v2.0 Memory card Reader (or similar vendor) and you will
see the full benefit of the CF's speed. I use the SanDisk 6 -in- 1 USB v2.0 Card Reader and
SanDisk 1GB UltraII 60x speed cards.


I replied out of context, didn't realize it was card readers at issue.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  #9  
Old February 3rd 05, 04:01 PM
David H. Lipman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's alright. It still adds to the totality of the thread.

--
Dave




"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
| David H. Lipman wrote:
|
| Yes but you can use a SanDisk USB v2.0 Memory card Reader (or similar vendor) and you
will
| see the full benefit of the CF's speed. I use the SanDisk 6 -in- 1 USB v2.0 Card Reader
and
| SanDisk 1GB UltraII 60x speed cards.
|
|
| I replied out of context, didn't realize it was card readers at issue.
|
| --
| -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
| -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
| -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
| -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.


  #10  
Old February 4th 05, 01:09 PM
Mac Tabak
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Sheldon" wrote in message
...
Has anybody noticed a difference between the new high-speed Compact Flash
cards vs. the "normal" ones? Are they worth the extra bucks?

I have a Nikon D70, if that makes a difference.

Thanks,

Sheldon


I use an 80x 1GB Lexar & she flies!!!!! Writes a raw file from the canon 20D
in 1.3 seconds!!!!!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax Optio 33LF Memory Cards Question Mr No Spam Digital Photography 2 November 24th 04 01:11 AM
SD Memory - does speed make a difference E-Star Digital Photography 10 October 24th 04 02:29 PM
CF or XD memory cards Mike Williams Digital Photography 10 August 7th 04 11:37 PM
Alternative to buying lots of memory cards? NoNameAtAll Digital Photography 10 June 28th 04 11:15 PM
is it worth the extra for the high speed CF cards? mutt Digital Photography 1 June 25th 04 09:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.