If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On 2018-05-22 07:14:11 +0000, David B. said:
Remember this unanswered question from 17 May? You got an you worthy answer. IIRC... -- teleportation kills |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On 22-May-18 10:25 AM, android wrote:
On 2018-05-22 07:14:11 +0000, David B. said: Remember this unanswered question from 17 May? You got an you worthy answer. IIRC... Sadly, you do NOT recall correctly. I answered you saying .... "I don't understand. :-( The link you posted is on Dropbox .... isn't it?" = You didn't continue our conversation (and answer my question). -- David B. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On 2018-05-22 09:58:39 +0000, David B. said:
On 22-May-18 10:25 AM, android wrote: On 2018-05-22 07:14:11 +0000, David B. said: Remember this unanswered question from 17 May? You got an you worthy answer. IIRC... Sadly, you do NOT recall correctly. I answered you saying .... "I don't understand. :-( The link you posted is on Dropbox .... isn't it?" = You didn't continue our conversation (and answer my question). Links to DB fails to work when the content is moved away... -- teleportation kills |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
In article , David B.
wrote: Links to DB fails to work when the content is moved away... I'm sure you are right - but why would you delete your content from Dropbox once you had put something there? because it's his content and he can add/remove it whenever he wants. Your original link was also 'different' to the links other folk post here when using Dropbox. I cannot recall exactly WHAT was different but it was. Maybe an inability to 'download' the image - I think that may have been it. nope. In truth, it was *SO* good that I posted the image on my Facebook timeline; without his permission. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On 05/22/2018 03:10 PM, David B. wrote:
Regardless of my CC by-nc-sa license, I would expect the courtesy to advise me of your intention to post that DB link on Facebook which I personally never use. I don't understand your license reference. Have you ever tried google search? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On 2018-05-23 08:56:31 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 07:54:39 UTC+1, android wrote: On 2018-05-23 05:35:17 +0000, David B. said: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-types-examples/ I could have downloaded your image from Dropbox and retained it and then used it for any purpose I chose. You could have. We agree. Some folk feel that is 'stealing' so I deliberately avoided taking that route. Technically it is stealing. Understood. It's not if you ask the courts of law in the EU and the USA: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100105/0109067611.shtml that only applies to linking not copying which could be classed as stealing, or perhaps copyright infringment. As there was something odd about the word stealing when used for something that isn't really a physical object. The subject of the discussion was hotlinking and that was the deed that Dave B had committed. Not illegal in practiced law... See: On 2018-05-23 05:35:17 +0000, David B. said: On 22-May-18 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 22, 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): On 22-May-18 2:18 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 22, 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): [---] In truth, it was *SO* good that I posted the image on my Facebook timeline; NOT a downloaded copy - simply a link to he- https://www.dropbox.com/s/qrpea4ijzw...DSC_3629-E.jpg -- teleportation kills |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On 2018-05-23 10:21:56 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 10:10:37 UTC+1, android wrote: On 2018-05-23 08:56:31 +0000, Whisky-dave said: On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 07:54:39 UTC+1, android wrote: On 2018-05-23 05:35:17 +0000, David B. said: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-types-examples/ I could have downloaded your image from Dropbox and retained it and then used it for any purpose I chose. You could have. We agree. Some folk feel that is 'stealing' so I deliberately avoided taking that route. Technically it is stealing. Understood. It's not if you ask the courts of law in the EU and the USA: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100105/0109067611.shtml that only applies to linking not copying which could be classed as stealing, or perhaps copyright infringment. As there was something odd about the word stealing when used for something that isn't really a physical object. The subject of the discussion was hotlinking and that was the deed that Dave B had committed. Not illegal in practiced law... Yes I know but that had changed to :- and this is where you made the mistake, perhaps you had the worng filter on . DB said I could have downloaded your image from Dropbox and retained it and then used it for any purpose I chose. You could have. We agree. Some folk feel that is 'stealing' so I deliberately avoided taking that route. Technically it is stealing. Which it is seen as. DB could NOT provide a link to SD's dropbox because SD had removed that link. So if DB did want to keep linking to that image he would have needed to copy the image and place it somewhere else and linked to it from there maybe he's own dropbox account and that could be seen as stealing. No it's not. Downloading third party material and then uploading it is stealing. With hotlinking the picture remains on your chosen server and thus under your control and not stolen. Feel free to change those laws... Again: https://photocopyrightlaw.com/can-embedding-hotlinking-or-inline-linking-constitute-copyright-infringement/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inline_linking#Copyright_law_issues_that_inline_li nking_raises -- teleportation kills |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:53:58 AM UTC-4, android wrote:
On 2018-05-23 10:21:56 +0000, Whisky-dave said: [attributions] Technically it is stealing. Which it is seen as. [...] No it's not. Downloading third party material and then uploading it is stealing. With hotlinking the picture remains on your chosen server and thus under your control and not stolen. Feel free to change those laws... Again: https://photocopyrightlaw.com/can-embedding-hotlinking-or-inline-linking-constitute-copyright-infringement/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inline...s_that_inline_ An interesting legal perspective, although I'd make a counterpoint that it really should depend on just how the hotlinking was done. IMO, its one thing if the hotlinked image had been dutifully attributed to its copyright owner, but if it was misrepresented as belonging to the one who did the hotlink, that's entirely a different story. When I've happened to have found hotlinks that fall more into the category of the latter, a strategy that I've taken at times is to change the image out from underneath them, so that they're linked to something different than they intended. Here's an example: http://huntzinger.com/photo/2002/germany/euros.jpg FWIW, some people have reportedly chosen alternative images which are vastly less ... civilized. -hh |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
In article , -hh
wrote: FWIW, some people have reportedly chosen alternative images which are vastly less ... civilized. which is by far the best solution. there's a certain photo with goat in its name that works wonders. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Rear Window 500/8 Mirror
In article , David B.
wrote: On 22-May-18 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote: Regardless of my CC by-nc-sa license, I would expect the courtesy to advise me of your intention to post that DB link on Facebook which I personally never use. I don't understand your license reference. CC = Creative Commons Thank you. I'm fairly sure that you've told me previously that I could share you images if I wished. somehow i doubt that. once again, you're trying to weasel out of having stolen other people's content. You just have to choose an appropriate cat. https://www.cat-lovers-only.com/imag...on-litter-box- 375.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8chR33SzqK.jpg I get "Sorry, there's no such page here" that's because you're an idiot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rear cover foam in an old SLR | Chris Loffredo | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | February 17th 06 07:58 PM |
Rear cover foam in an old SLR | Mike | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | February 17th 06 03:47 PM |
Rear tilt focus? | [email protected] | Large Format Photography Equipment | 28 | April 20th 05 12:41 AM |
WTB: 2d rear extension & other discussion | Collin Brendemuehl | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 2 | September 30th 04 06:02 PM |
will frequent use of mirror lockup shorten lifespan of mirror mechanism? | Mxsmanic | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | August 16th 04 06:13 PM |