If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome: worth a look
ColinD wrote,on my timestamp of 4/07/2009 9:30 AM:
Very good, Noons, very good. Ah well: after being working since Friday night, I got to let out steam somehow, no? ¦B) Your rejoinders are almost up to the wit of a retarded ten-year-old. Now, now: "wit" is too long a word for you... When are you gonna say your father's bigger than my father? I didn't say it. But apparently your mum yelled it out loud. Oh, sorry, I forgot you were hatched, weren't you? Cloned. Hatched is soooooo last millenium... |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome: worth a look
Bill Graham wrote,on my timestamp of 4/07/2009 5:10 AM:
One adjective that should NEVER be used in all these discussions is: "clean" It is a subliminal marketing word designed to elicit the same response as in detergent advertising, exploiting the natural human rejection of "dirty". It has absolutely no meaning whatsoever in the context of sound or imaging. Pure marketing. Perhaps, but I use the word to mean, "relatively noise free". In the Yeah, but noise is not "dirt". And neither is noise present in film imaging. Perhaps grain and other effects. But not noise. Instead, it is present in digital imaging, perhaps paradoxically? case of a record, needle scratch is usually the problem, and with tape, it was tape hiss. I have heard systems that had neither, or at least, the scratch or hiss was virtually inaudible. With some program types, there is other noise that is difficult to squelch...... I'd call it extraneous noise: noise not associated with the original signal. But that is really academic and I can see your point. It is very hard to eliminate fret board noise from a guitar, for example, although with digital recordings, one can remove it if one can identify it in the digital signal. These problems are mostly peculiar to classical music. Pop music is so loud and noisy (as a rule) that nobody cares. Can you imagine worrying about fret board noise in a Rolling Stones recording? dude: it'd NOT BE a Rolling Stones recording without noise, fret or other! |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome: worth a look
Noons wrote:
ColinD wrote,on my timestamp of 4/07/2009 9:30 AM: Very good, Noons, very good. Ah well: after being working since Friday night, I got to let out steam somehow, no? ¦B) Your rejoinders are almost up to the wit of a retarded ten-year-old. Now, now: "wit" is too long a word for you... When are you gonna say your father's bigger than my father? I didn't say it. But apparently your mum yelled it out loud. Oh, sorry, I forgot you were hatched, weren't you? Cloned. Hatched is soooooo last millenium... Y'know, to my total surprise, I detected conscious humour there! This verbal jousting has its lighter side. Thanks. Colin D. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome: worth a look
ColinD wrote,on my timestamp of 6/07/2009 9:00 PM:
Y'know, to my total surprise, I detected conscious humour there! This verbal jousting has its lighter side. Thanks. ¦B) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R.I.P. Kodachrome | Max Perl | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | June 23rd 09 07:39 AM |
R.I.P. Kodachrome | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | June 23rd 09 06:40 AM |
Kodachrome and X-pan? | mr. chip | Film & Labs | 7 | November 18th 04 03:50 PM |
Kodachrome and X-pan | Stuart Droker | Film & Labs | 0 | November 9th 04 10:24 PM |
Kodachrome 120? | Lunaray | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 5 | February 24th 04 12:13 AM |