If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How To Use a 50mm Lens to Shoot Portrait?
Hi Folks,
I by far got only one lens, a CZ 50mm. Using it to shoot portraits, is it possible to get good results? I like to hear some advice on anything around this case, about composition, subject distance, enlarge and so on. And, is there any free gallery about this kind works on-line? Maybe I can learn by example. For printed gallery, I heard the big man Cartier Bresson, which one of his book is suit for my purpose? Thanks in advance. - narke |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: How To Use a 50mm Lens to Shoot Portrait?
From: "narke" Date: Wed, Jan 19, 2005 1:47 AM Message-id: .com Hi Folks, I by far got only one lens, a CZ 50mm. Using it to shoot portraits, is it possible to get good results? No, its possible to get great or terrible or good results or anything inbetween - it depends on the skill of the photographer... most 50mm lenses are spectacularly sharp (yours may be one of the sharpest of all if its the 50/1.4mm CZ). For more "conventional" headshots for commercial clients (anybody who pays you money for a headshot/etc.) you might want to consider also buying/supplementing with a 100mm or longer lens to be able to stand back for slightly more compressed facial features and a relatively tight crop, but for general subject in environment work the 50mm you have should do you well. The first question you need to ask yourself/answer is what kind of "portraits" do you want to do? Will these be tight headshots, subject in environment or a range from one to the other? Who are your subjects? What do they expect/want from the pictures? Are the pictures merely to satisfy your own artistic wants/needs or are you "styling"/marketing (damn how I hate that word(s) them to a particular kind of audience? "Portraits" is too vague a term without some specifics/qualifiers - tell us exactly what you want to do and hope to accomplish so we can help you better. I like to hear some advice on anything around this case, about composition, subject distance, enlarge and so on. Enlarge? What do you mean by "enlarge"? And, is there any free gallery about this kind works on-line? Maybe I can learn by example. You might want to type in search terms like "photo" and "critique" into search engines to come up with some photo critiqueing websites that allow you to do searches based on a particular criteria("s") such as "portrait" and/or "50mm" (lens. For printed gallery, I heard the big man Cartier Bresson, which one of his book is suit for my purpose? Virtually any of them, since he primarily used the 50mm lens for all his people shots (photojournalistic and portraits). Also check into Ralph Gibson who did a lot of work with the 50mm lens, though he now uses the 90mm lens focal length on his Leica more. Ralph does a kind of minimalist surreal graphic formalism - just find his work by searching on the web or in books (at the library or at Amazon.com and you'll know what I mean alot better than just trying to explain it to you). Thanks in advance. - narke Your welcome in retrospect ;-) Most of my people/portrait work nowadays... gasp... is done with a 50mm Series E Nikon lens. Some random thoughts... Don't get fixated on the fixed 50mm lens (even if its the only lens you own ;-)). Don't think 50mm, think composition/design and how you want to place the subject within the frame. Think in the abstract. Think shapes, colors, etc. The best thing about a 50mm lens is that it forces you to forget about 50mm lenses (or any other focal length) and since it has such a natural imprint (you don't have the advantage/disadvantage of an overpowering "look" to the 50mm focal length you'd get from the space expanding perspective you'd get from getting up close to your subject with an ultra wide angle of a 15mm nor the spacial compression you'd get from using a 500mm telephoto lens from faraway such as the stacking two or more that are far away from each other seemingly on top of each other (ie. buildings/streets scene from a great distance), your main point of concern becomes the image/image questions such as content and composition (subject's expression, posing of subject, amount of space around subject, how that space is broken up into shapes/colors/tones and/or idea elements that contrast or echo your subject to show relationships/make points about the subject, etc.). Head shots can work with a 50mm lens but straight onto the subject they become more "character portraits" when your (too) close which can work for some subjects and not others. You might want to try some profiles (when/where appropriate) or even buy a 2x extender which allows you to be twice the distance away and get the same image size/crop/still get a relatively close crop on the person's face (the classic "headshot" cropping/perspective) but without the "nose enlarged/ears receding" phenomenon you get when you try to use you 50mm at headshot (read very near ie 1 1/2 to 2 feet away from your subject's face) framing distances. Its a matter of both subject, shooting style and appropriateness(/whether you can pull it off) for using the 50mm for close headshots. I can reccommend Carrie Branovan (in addition to my own more recent work which is not on my website which has more surreal/PJ work from various focal lengths). She's a portrait/fashion photographer who primarily (totally?) works in 35mm with the Nikon 50mm f/1.2 lens wide open (for selective focus effects). You can find her work in a back issue of the Spring 199 Photographer's Forum magazine beginning on pg. 43 - perhaps her work is on the web too. I believe alot of Elliott Erwitt's work (personal snapshots/art shots of people) has been done with a 50mm dual range Summicron on a Leica (amongst other focal lengths/camera systems). Check out his work too. Particularly check out both the book and the series "Masters of Contemporary Photgraphy". This is out of print, having been done in the 1970's but is still very relevant in getting into the mind/reasons why of the photographer where the real picture taking takes place, behind the lens in the mind not in front of the lens) Read, photograph, critique and/or get critique, read and photograph some more. Mastership comes from doing, studying and just plain old being aware. In photography its the vision that counts more so than the lens or the focal length. Happy shooting and reading... This post is... © 2005 Lewis Lang All Rights (and wrongs) Reserved Check out my photos at "LEWISVISION": http://members.aol.com/Lewisvisn/home.htm Remove "nospam" to reply ***DUE TO SPAM, I NOW BLOCK ALL E-MAIL NOT ON MY LIST, TO BE ADDED TO MY LIST, PING ME ON THE NEWSGROUP. SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. :-) *** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
dont get to close to avoid distortion ( especially the nose )
p a href="http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/" Antique & Classic Camera Site/a/p |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
dont get to close to avoid distortion ( especially the nose )
p a href="http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/" Antique & Classic Camera Site/a/p |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Using it to shoot portraits, is it possible to get good results? I
like to hear some advice on anything around this case, about composition, subject distance, enlarge and so on." No, it is not possible to get good results. The lens is too short. You need a lens in the range 80mm-135mm focal length for portraits. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Using it to shoot portraits, is it possible to get good results? I
like to hear some advice on anything around this case, about composition, subject distance, enlarge and so on." No, it is not possible to get good results. The lens is too short. You need a lens in the range 80mm-135mm focal length for portraits. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No, it is not possible to get good results. The lens is too short
its very possible to get good results - see a pic from a 55mm lens http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/m6.jpg p a href="http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/" Antique & Classic Camera Site/a/p |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
narke wrote:
Hi Folks, I by far got only one lens, a CZ 50mm. Using it to shoot portraits, is it possible to get good results? I like to hear some advice on anything around this case, about composition, subject distance, enlarge and so on. 50mm is a bit wide for closeup portraits. Distorts features. But there is a way around it: Say you want to make a head and shoulders shot, compose it to fill the frame, then increase your distance by 2/3 more to twice as far away. Crop the result. The perspective will be correct, there will be no distortion. DOF will not be as shallow as you might like. If you're making a portrait of a small group, 3-5 people, it should work quite well with the frame filled for the composition. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
DColucci wrote:
No, it is not possible to get good results. The lens is too short its very possible to get good results - see a pic from a 55mm lens http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/m6.jpg Excellent example. Did you crop that from a larger frame? -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
50mm is a bit wide for closeup portraits. snipped The perspective will be correct, there will be no distortion. DOF will not be as shallow as you might like. Snipped here too Unbelievable... The first day back on the job and here is Alan Browne stating that "perspective will be correct" in the discussion of a defined focal length lens after going on and on and on about perspective having nothing to do with focal length in relation to a portrait... As I Shake my head in wonderment. According to the theory argued by Alan a few weeks ago, the focal length of a lens has nothing to do with perspective. Now he's saying by using a 50mm lens and moving the camera, you can alter the perspective. Any chance of consistency, Alan? If you're going to rant at me for saying you get a better perspective with an 80 or 100 mm lens than you do with a 50mm one, how about not arguing I'm wrong and then saying the same thing yourself a few weeks later? Maybe you read some of the text books I pointed to on the subject and changed your mind without telling anyone? Doug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
28mm or 50mm Fixed focus lens for Canon dRebel | Siddhartha Jain | Digital Photography | 15 | November 9th 04 03:21 AM |
El-cheapo loupe - 50mm lens? | Siddhartha Jain | 35mm Photo Equipment | 15 | November 8th 04 09:55 PM |
Canon 50 mm lens | John McWilliams | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | October 6th 04 04:43 PM |
bellows hood for old 50mm hassy chrome lens | nobody nowhere | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 8 | August 2nd 04 10:51 PM |
Telephoto Binocular Comparison | foto | Photographing Nature | 21 | December 26th 03 03:27 PM |