If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said:
On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician? With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of satisfaction, however fleeting that might be. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
On 9/17/2013 12:47 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
In article , says... On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Well, yes, getting screwed by a prostitute is a _good_ thing. They sell it. Still have it. Sell it again. Depends on the extent to which you've enjoyed it. I have been several tiems and didn't enjoy the experience. -- PeterN |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said: On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician? With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of satisfaction, however fleeting that might be. Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite efficient. that was one politician that help. When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed. http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm Why does Congress refuse to allow Medicare to negotiate the price of drugs., etc. -- PeterN |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
On 2013-09-17 10:40:26 -0700, Tony Cooper said:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said: On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician? With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of satisfaction, however fleeting that might be. Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite efficient. Come to think of it I also had one such experience when I needed some help with the State Department regarding my "step-daughter from Hell"(she like her mother was a UK citizen). Senator Alan Cranston was instrumental in having his office provide the assistance I needed. ....and I am still waiting for that prostitute provided satisfaction. ;-) -- Regards, Savageduck |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
In article , tonycooper214
@gmail.com says... On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:49:31 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said: On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician? With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of satisfaction, however fleeting that might be. Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite efficient. that was one politician that help. Well, I asked one to help and he did so. When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed. http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm That isn't an example of a experience with a politician. While I agree with you on the need - although I would take it further and have much more stringent gun controls - you brought up comparing a personal experience with a politician vs a personal experience with a prostitute. Besides, background check legislation was enacted 20 years ago, so the politicians can be forgiven for not passing the same law again. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:37:17 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote: In article , tonycooper214 says... On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:49:31 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said: On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician? With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of satisfaction, however fleeting that might be. Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite efficient. that was one politician that help. Well, I asked one to help and he did so. When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed. http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm That isn't an example of a experience with a politician. While I agree with you on the need - although I would take it further and have much more stringent gun controls - you brought up comparing a personal experience with a politician vs a personal experience with a prostitute. Besides, background check legislation was enacted 20 years ago, so the politicians can be forgiven for not passing the same law again. Tell them in Washington. :-( -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
In article , tonycooper214
@gmail.com says... On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:46:24 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:37:17 -0400, "J. Clarke" wrote: In article , tonycooper214 says... On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:49:31 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said: On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article , "Bowser" wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote: On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote: On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote: Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013. I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture of the Capitol or the White House. They sold out a long time ago. True. But it's on ongoing sale. Confirmed then: they are prostitutes. Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over politicians any day. Is there a difference? Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician? With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of satisfaction, however fleeting that might be. Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite efficient. that was one politician that help. Well, I asked one to help and he did so. When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed. http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm That isn't an example of a experience with a politician. While I agree with you on the need - although I would take it further and have much more stringent gun controls - you brought up comparing a personal experience with a politician vs a personal experience with a prostitute. Besides, background check legislation was enacted 20 years ago, so the politicians can be forgiven for not passing the same law again. Tell them in Washington. :-( Stores that sell guns in Florida are required to conduct background checks. Not to worry, though, if you don't think you will pass. Just go to a flea market and buy a gun. Don't want to wait until the weekend for the flea market? Look on Craigslist and buy one today. No background checks required by either seller. Which is the general exception for private sales, which is a nod to the reality that there is no practical way to police private sales of firearms. When Grandpa kicks it and Grandma wants to get rid of his guns, she's not going to consult a lawyer to find out that she has to do background checks. That's the reality that Congress was dealing with, and making a criminal out of Grandma is a political non-starter. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"
On 2013-09-17 18:38:55 -0700, "J. Clarke" said:
In article , tonycooper214 @gmail.com says... Stores that sell guns in Florida are required to conduct background checks. Not to worry, though, if you don't think you will pass. Just go to a flea market and buy a gun. Don't want to wait until the weekend for the flea market? Look on Craigslist and buy one today. No background checks required by either seller. Which is the general exception for private sales, which is a nod to the reality that there is no practical way to police private sales of firearms. When Grandpa kicks it and Grandma wants to get rid of his guns, she's not going to consult a lawyer to find out that she has to do background checks. That's the reality that Congress was dealing with, and making a criminal out of Grandma is a political non-starter. In California all firearms transactions have to be conducted through a dealer. Private sales must be facilitated by a dealer, the ten day waiting period and background check is mandatory. "In California, only licensed California firearms dealers who possess a valid Certificate of Eligibility (COE) are authorized to engage in retail sales of firearms. These retail sales require the purchaser to provide personal identifier information for the Dealer Record of Sale (DROS) document that the firearms dealer must submit to the DOJ. There is a mandatory 10-day waiting period before the firearms dealer can deliver the firearm to the purchaser. During this 10-day waiting period, the DOJ conducts a firearms eligibility background check to ensure the purchaser is not prohibited from lawfully possessing firearms. Although there are exceptions, generally all firearms purchasers must be at least 18 years of age to purchase a long gun (rifle or shotgun) and 21 years of age to purchase a handgun (pistol or revolver). Additionally, purchasers must be California residents with a valid driver’s license or identification card issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. Generally, it is illegal for any person who is not a California licensed firearms dealer (private party) to sell or transfer a firearm to another non-licensed person (private party) unless the sale is completed through a licensed California firearms dealer. A “Private Party Transfer” (PPT) can be conducted at any licensed California firearms dealership that sells handguns. The buyer and seller must complete the required DROS document in person at the licensed firearms dealership and deliver the firearm to the dealer who will retain possession of the firearm during the mandatory 10-day waiting period. In addition to the applicable state fees, the firearms dealer may charge a fee not to exceed $10 per firearm for conducting the PPT. The infrequent transfer of firearms between immediate family members is exempt from the law requiring PPTs to be conducted through a licensed firearms dealer. For purposes of this exemption, “immediate family member” means parent and child, and grandparent and grandchild but does not include brothers or sisters. (Pen. Code, § 16720.) Please note that if the firearm being transferred is a handgun, the transferee must comply with the Handgun Safety Certificate requirement described below, prior to taking possession of the firearm. Within 30 days of the transfer, the transferee must also submit a report of the transaction to the DOJ. To obtain the required report form (Report of Operation of Law or Intra-Familial Handgun Transaction BOF 4544A), either contact the DOJ Bureau of Firearms at (916) 227-7527 or download the form from the DOJ’s website at http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/forms. The reclaiming of a pawned firearm is subject to the DROS and 10-day waiting period requirements." -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] New Mandate - The letters "F", "G" and "S" | Bowser | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | August 27th 12 12:22 PM |
[SI] New Mandate - The letters "F", "G" and "S" | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 3 | August 26th 12 02:20 PM |
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ | \The Great One\ | Digital Photography | 0 | July 14th 09 12:04 AM |
[SI] Weekly Reminder. The current mandate ("open") is due 2008.08.31 | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 9 | August 18th 08 02:21 AM |