If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Macro/Closeup
SI Committee wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/macrocloseup Firstly thanks to all the people that have taken the time to comment on each image. All very helpful, so for what it's worth here's mine Tim Conway 1. nice detail, bad memories :-###.. 2. out of focus 3. looks very flat, low contrast or something Savageduck 1.second, because it's not the worst 2 third, as a record shot it's trying to be too artsy 3 first, nice detail shows of the piece as it should, all three are technically good as you'd expect. RichA 1. lacking something, a point of interest maybe Bowser 1. good detail, like the b&w 2. ditto 3. ditto sid 1. yes it is disc brakes, twin front discs on a Triumph Sprint 955i 2. OK the focus should be on one thing or the other, I'll blur the petals a bit and see. Apple blossom, btw. 3. It's a daisy about 12-14mm across. I like the contrast between the petals and the grass Frank Ess 1. whatever the intention the out of focus bee ruins it for me 2. I don't know what it is but it's close and sharp with good detail 3 I like the lighting and the idea but position in the frame should be higher Dan Petre 1. I like it, has a feeling of movement to it Bob Flint. 1. Not really close enough for me 2. this one is and is nice and detailed to go with it 3. again not really close enough for me, although technically good Andrew Reilly 1. I can see you're close to the tree 2. I like this one, a bit closer to the tendril would have been better 3. no2 is the better one, as much as anything the background is distracting MG 1. Close and sharp, I'd crop out the sky at the top and probably the burnt out petals bottom left 2. never seen one of those before, not an attractive foto to my eye, though it does an admirable job of showing what a crane flower looks like 3. like richAs photo it's a bit flat although an interesting subject Chemiker 1. nice enough, better with both wings out flat 2. surreal Martha Coe 1. not close enough or sharp enough 2. close enough but not sharp enough 3. best of the three, maybe tone tone the bright leaves bottom left peter newman 1. bright bold and close. looks good, would be better without the orange frame 2. very good. I've tried with one of them and did not succeed as you have 3. again very good, look no frame Alan Browne 1. it's close 2. nice and sharp where the focus is, good backgroud 3. very good Tony Cooper 1. good job, lizard really stands out 2. excellent focus, I just like it a bit more central 3. nice, good separation from background All of which off course is just my opinion -- sid RLU 300284 2010.2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Macro/Closeup | SI Committee | Digital SLR Cameras | 58 | June 17th 12 06:01 PM |
[SI] Macro/Closeup | sid | Digital Photography | 0 | May 31st 12 08:08 PM |
[SI] Macro/Closeup - Some comments | Bowser | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | May 31st 12 06:35 PM |