If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
Thoughts please on best available PC desktop Photo Printer for photo
realistic quality. Although main use is 6" x 4" 's, A3 printer is OK if it is the best offering . ( budget is $700). No requirement to read cards, just great gloss prints. Currently own 1270. So far considering Canon i9900 and Epson R800. Have discarded Epson 2100/2200 from short list. Speed nor cost per print not absolutely critical either. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
Warren Jones wrote:
Thoughts please on best available PC desktop Photo Printer for photo realistic quality. Although main use is 6" x 4" 's, A3 printer is OK if it is the best offering . ( budget is $700). No requirement to read cards, just great gloss prints. Currently own 1270. So far considering Canon i9900 and Epson R800. Have discarded Epson 2100/2200 from short list. Speed nor cost per print not absolutely critical either. I'm printing from my second Epson PictureMate as I write this. First one was returned because of vertical banding, and second one has the same problem. Nozzle checks are clear, and I've tried to align the heads, but the top group of blocks in the alignment check always have a light vertical band no matter what I do. Called Epson, they have no solution. Printing with 'Enhanced Details' set helps, but I can still just see the banding up close with the naked eye. I am very nearsighted, though, so I suspect others wouldn't notice (my wife doesn't). Even I can't see it at normal viewing distances (6" or more). Note setting to the Enhanced Details mode does slow down output considerably. Ohterwise the prints are very nice. I do have to tweak things a bit in PS to get warm (rather than ruddy) causcasian skin tones, something I don't have to do on my old Photo 750. I will probably keep the printer, for its convenience, portability, and because it's the cheapest way to get high quality, archival 4x6 prints at home - about 25 cents a print. B.A.S. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
Warren Jones wrote: Thoughts please on best available PC desktop Photo Printer for photo realistic quality. Although main use is 6" x 4" 's, A3 printer is OK if it is the best offering . ( budget is $700). No requirement to read cards, just great gloss prints. Currently own 1270. So far considering Canon i9900 and Epson R800. Have discarded Epson 2100/2200 from short list. Speed nor cost per print not absolutely critical either. Flip a coin. They are both "killer" printers I'll bet that you could not tell the difference in side by side comparisons. Epson probably has a bigger line of Photo Quality papers available. Canon is probably a bit faster. You are in the enviable position that no matter which one you choose, you've chosen correctly. Bob Williams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
Check the HiTi printer.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
Bob Williams wrote in message ...
Warren Jones wrote: Thoughts please on best available PC desktop Photo Printer for photo realistic quality. Although main use is 6" x 4" 's, A3 printer is OK if it is the best offering . ( budget is $700). No requirement to read cards, just great gloss prints. Currently own 1270. So far considering Canon i9900 and Epson R800. Have discarded Epson 2100/2200 from short list. Speed nor cost per print not absolutely critical either. Flip a coin. They are both "killer" printers I'll bet that you could not tell the difference in side by side comparisons. Epson probably has a bigger line of Photo Quality papers available. Canon is probably a bit faster. Yes, both of those printers will make superb looking glossy prints (now with Epson having that glossy overcoat to fix the problem in the 2200 on glossy paper). For 6" x 4" prints, the print speeds shouldn't be much different either (nor terribly long). However, the i9900 can print much larger prints than the R800, it can print up to 13" wide printing while the R800 is limited to 8.3" wide printing (according to Epson's website). The i9900 is not just fast, it's *FAST*. Can print a 13" x 19" print in about 3 minutes. So, if you don't have secret ambitions for large prints, "never mind", but if you do, the i9900 has a big advantage. Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:26:07 GMT, "Arthur Small"
wrote: Check the HiTi printer. Or the Canon CP-220/320 dye-sub printers. It's limited to 4x6" prints, but print results are extremely good. There are inkjet inks that will last longer though. Peter Everything about Vancouver, Canada http://www.YourVancouver.com Touchup, an image viewing applet (also shows EXIF) http://members.shaw.ca/jonespm2/software.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Best photo printer mostly borderless 6" x 4" 's.
In my opinion, Canon is the way to go!
The speed and picture quality are simply the best. "Warren Jones" wrote in message ... Thoughts please on best available PC desktop Photo Printer for photo realistic quality. Although main use is 6" x 4" 's, A3 printer is OK if it is the best offering . ( budget is $700). No requirement to read cards, just great gloss prints. Currently own 1270. So far considering Canon i9900 and Epson R800. Have discarded Epson 2100/2200 from short list. Speed nor cost per print not absolutely critical either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|