A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 13th 18, 06:41 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

Anyone ?
  #3  
Old September 13th 18, 10:07 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,488
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

On Sep 13, 2018, David Taylor wrote
(in article ):

On 13/09/2018 18:41, wrote:
Anyone ?


The manufacturers wish to make a profit, as do their shareholders, and
the distribution and retail chain. Newcomers such as Nikon and Canon
will want to recover their development costs, and like to price the
items as "premium" products (and, of course, the great majority of users
don't need FF, so sales are likely to be relatively small, especially if
new lenses are required.

I think there's at least an element of truth in the above
tongue-in-cheek remarks!


....and there are a whole mob of non-pro individuals who are insanely brand
faithful, think they have the very best, and have been conditioned to believe
that FF is the only way, because that is what Canon & Nikon have told them.
Also FF sensors are more costly than M45, & APS-C sensors, just as MF sensors
are more costly than FF sensors. Just wait until folks hear what the new 100MB
MF sensor cameras are going to cost.

Remember, all the leading MILCs from Olympus, Panasonic, Sony, Fujifilm, and
even Leica have been going after the same pie eroding the sale of the Canon &
Nikon APS-C & FF DSLRs, and with Nikon 85% of their DSLR business is not with
FF, but APS-C. However, there has been massive loss of FF share to Sony, and
they are not going to take that sitting down.

Personally, I have no need for FF in a DSLR, or MILC, never have, and that is
one of the things which steered me away from Nikon 3 years ago.

--
Regards,
Savageduck

  #4  
Old September 14th 18, 01:34 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,774
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

In article ,
RichA wrote:


You forgot the increasingly specious excuse about "wafer yields" for FF sensors. Or is that passe?


there's nothing specious about it.
  #5  
Old September 14th 18, 01:29 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
MC[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 284
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

The author has marked this message not to be archived. This post will be deleted on September 28, 2018.

Savageduck wrote:


...and there are a whole mob of non-pro individuals who are insanely
brand faithful, think they have the very best, and have been
conditioned to believe that...


So, a bit like those who buy Apple products regardless of the obscene
Apple pricing model, maybe.
:0)

MC
  #6  
Old September 14th 18, 04:05 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,488
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

On Sep 14, 2018, MC wrote
(in article ):

Savageduck wrote:


...and there are a whole mob of non-pro individuals who are insanely
brand faithful, think they have the very best, and have been
conditioned to believe that...


So, a bit like those who buy Apple products regardless of the obscene
Apple pricing model, maybe.
0)


Maybe for some.

Personally I buy and use Apple products, because they integrate well, and just
work for me. Before I started using iPhones (my first was an iPhone 4) I had a
Nokia “Brick”, a hard installed Alpine in my car, and various others
including Motorola, and Samsung. The iPhone just works for me, and I suspect
other folks have had the same experience, and are prepared to pay for that
familiarity.

I really don’t care too much what other folks use if it works for them, and
that goes for cameras. I still have, but haven’t used recently my analog film
Pentax, and Yashica cameras, along with my various digital cameras from Nikon,
Canon, and Fujifilm

--
Regards,
Savageduck


  #7  
Old September 14th 18, 07:11 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,059
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

On 14/09/2018 01:30, RichA wrote:
[]
You forgot the increasingly specious excuse about "wafer yields" for FF sensors. Or is that passe?


Yes, that's a point. But just another reason to go for smaller sensors
which can do most jobs just as well.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
  #8  
Old September 14th 18, 07:29 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,774
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

In article , MC
wrote:

...and there are a whole mob of non-pro individuals who are insanely
brand faithful, think they have the very best, and have been
conditioned to believe that...


So, a bit like those who buy Apple products regardless of the obscene
Apple pricing model, maybe.


nothing like that at all, because there is no 'obscene apple pricing
model'.
  #9  
Old September 14th 18, 09:24 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Davoud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

MC:
So, a bit like those who buy Apple products regardless of the obscene
Apple pricing model, maybe.


Another pathetic case of Apple envy.

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
  #10  
Old September 15th 18, 12:25 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,774
Default Why are FF MILCs so Expensive !

In article ,
RichA wrote:

...and there are a whole mob of non-pro individuals who are insanely
brand faithful, think they have the very best, and have been
conditioned to believe that...

So, a bit like those who buy Apple products regardless of the obscene
Apple pricing model, maybe.


nothing like that at all, because there is no 'obscene apple pricing
model'.


I don't know if it's true, I heard Apple's profit-margins are something like
2x that of Samsung, etc.


it's not, not that it matters one way or the other.

if you don't think a given product is worth its asking price, don't buy
it.

meanwhile, apple and samsung are selling ****loads of phones. other
makers not so much...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noct: Nikon subrand for FF MILCs? android Digital Photography 10 June 4th 18 06:52 AM
Olympus Sells More MILCs Than Anybody Else android Digital Photography 0 November 15th 17 07:41 PM
The Market: MILCs Steady but RILCs are Falling android Digital Photography 7 March 5th 17 08:38 AM
Nikon Will Focus on MILCs??? android Digital Photography 3 February 27th 17 12:49 AM
About expensive lenses King Sardon Digital Photography 0 January 30th 07 09:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.