If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
I take a lot of pictures at car shows. The digital cameras I've had to date,
have trouble rendering white cars in direct sunlight. You can't see the curves of the body panels, they come out pure white with no shading! Cars that are not white come out beautifully. I'm in the market for a new "point and shoot" camera. I've narrowed my choice down to the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd or the Nikon CoolPix 610. Both of these models are advertised as having special "dynamic range" modes. Which one would be my best bet for avoiding washed out highlights? -- Bob D. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
Bob Donahue wrote:
I take a lot of pictures at car shows. The digital cameras I've had to date, have trouble rendering white cars in direct sunlight. You can't see the curves of the body panels, they come out pure white with no shading! Cars that are not white come out beautifully. I'm in the market for a new "point and shoot" camera. I've narrowed my choice down to the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd or the Nikon CoolPix 610. Both of these models are advertised as having special "dynamic range" modes. Which one would be my best bet for avoiding washed out highlights? Bob, you may be able to save money simply by setting the exposure compensation on your existing camera to -1/3 stop - i.e. just under-expose a little. Fuji have made CCDs in the past with dual sensors at each pixel - large sensors for the main parts image and smaller sensors for the bright parts of the image. This technology I would be inclined to trust, although I have not used it myself. I don't know if the F100fd includes this technology, but it appears that it might. You may need to use RAW mode to make the most of this, and it's not obvious whether the F100fd has RAW.. A small-sensor camera offering up to ISO 12800 I would not trust, as it's simply beyond the laws of physics to produce a reasonable 12MP image. Check for yourself before purchase! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0801/08...fujif100fd.asp David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:40:55 -0400, Bob Donahue wrote:
I take a lot of pictures at car shows. The digital cameras I've had to date, have trouble rendering white cars in direct sunlight. You can't see the curves of the body panels, they come out pure white with no shading! Cars that are not white come out beautifully. I'm in the market for a new "point and shoot" camera. I've narrowed my choice down to the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd or the Nikon CoolPix 610. Both of these models are advertised as having special "dynamic range" modes. Which one would be my best bet for avoiding washed out highlights? Possibly the camera you already own. Which one is it? As David mentioned, a slight amount of exposure compensation may give you back the missing white highlights, although it may require more than a -1/3 stop reduction. If your camera can show histograms on playback, it'll show pretty clearly if you're pictures are being overexposed. Some cameras also combine a "blinking highlights" feature that will show the highlight problem areas. As for the better camera, I'd say probably the F100fd, but that's a guess since here (USA) the Coolpix S610 has no reviews since it isn't yet available. B&H indicates that they'll be getting them in October. If it's anything like the similarly spec'ed CoolPix S600, the Coolpix P60 and Panasonic's LZ10, Fuji's F100fd clearly outperforms them for detail and image quality, most obviously at higher ISOs. Only a little was said about the CP S600's D-Lighting, and the example primarily showed improved shadow detail. More attention was paid to improving dynamic range in the F100fd's reviews, so here's some of what was said. Links follow : The FinePix F100fd's adjustable Dynamic Range adjustment helped in harsh lighting as in the portrait shots above. You can see that highlight detail in the white shirt is off the chart in the first two images, but increasing the dynamic range helped to bring out more detail in this area, as well as in the shadows and midtones. http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...FD/F100FDA.HTM My overall impression of the F100fd is that it does exhibit a bit more range than most, if not all compacts I've tested in the past, but the impression is not from this comparison alone. Surf shots with the F100fd showed consistent retention of detail in the white water portion of the waves rather than lost highlights typical of most other cameras. http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/d...sp?newsID=3440 http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/d...n+coolpix+s600 http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/d...view=nikon+p60 http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/d...c+lumix+lz1 0 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
Hi Bob,
Have you thought about a camera that shoots in RAW mode, which gives you much greater control over the end result. Regards, John. Bob Donahue wrote: I take a lot of pictures at car shows. The digital cameras I've had to date, have trouble rendering white cars in direct sunlight. You can't see the curves of the body panels, they come out pure white with no shading! Cars that are not white come out beautifully. I'm in the market for a new "point and shoot" camera. I've narrowed my choice down to the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd or the Nikon CoolPix 610. Both of these models are advertised as having special "dynamic range" modes. Which one would be my best bet for avoiding washed out highlights? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:55:47 GMT, David J Taylor wrote:
A small-sensor camera offering up to ISO 12800 I would not trust, as it's simply beyond the laws of physics to produce a reasonable 12MP image. Check for yourself before purchase! I wouldn't trust this comment unless it's reworded slightly. Are you sure that you didn't mean to type something like : I wouldn't trust a small-sensor camera's ISO 12,800 offering . . . Many cameras, including the F100fd and some from Casio, Panasonic and Olympus offer very high ISO settings at reduced resolution, and that doesn't mean that these cameras can't be trusted. When used at lower, more reasonable ISO settings they can produce very good images. The F100fd's image quality at ISO 12,800 isn't very good, but nobody that is at all familiar with small sensor cameras would expect it to be. In fact, it's not all that bad. It won't produce great or very good quality 4"x6" snapshots, but what it does produce will be usable, and better than what many other small sensor cameras can do at much lower ISO settings. Reduced resolution or pixel binning leaves a lot to be desired, but it's better than the alternative, which is usually a totally unusable image. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:40:55 -0400, Bob Donahue wrote:
I take a lot of pictures at car shows. The digital cameras I've had to date, have trouble rendering white cars in direct sunlight. You can't see the curves of the body panels, they come out pure white with no shading! Cars that are not white come out beautifully. I'm in the market for a new "point and shoot" camera. I've narrowed my choice down to the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd or the Nikon CoolPix 610. Both of these models are advertised as having special "dynamic range" modes. Which one would be my best bet for avoiding washed out highlights? If you shoot jpeg, you have 8 bits of dynamic range (in each RGB component) - that's it - because that's all the camera's jpeg format will support. If you shoot raw you'll have 12 bits or more. The discontinued Kodak P series EVF long zooms will shoot raw as well as jpeg or tiff. You can frequently find them on Kodak's online store at great prices. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
ray wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:40:55 -0400, Bob Donahue wrote: I take a lot of pictures at car shows. The digital cameras I've had to date, have trouble rendering white cars in direct sunlight. You can't see the curves of the body panels, they come out pure white with no shading! Cars that are not white come out beautifully. I'm in the market for a new "point and shoot" camera. I've narrowed my choice down to the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd or the Nikon CoolPix 610. Both of these models are advertised as having special "dynamic range" modes. Which one would be my best bet for avoiding washed out highlights? If you shoot jpeg, you have 8 bits of dynamic range (in each RGB component) - that's it - because that's all the camera's jpeg format will support. If you shoot raw you'll have 12 bits or more. The discontinued Kodak P series EVF long zooms will shoot raw as well as jpeg or tiff. You can frequently find them on Kodak's online store at great prices. Ray, you are mistaken here. If anything, JPEG actually offers the greater dynamic range because it uses non-linear gamma-corrected encoding, as opposed to the linear coding of RAW. What JPEG lacks, however, is precision of representing light levels, plus ths "loss" due to compression (in most JPEGs). David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
ASAAR wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:55:47 GMT, David J Taylor wrote: A small-sensor camera offering up to ISO 12800 I would not trust, as it's simply beyond the laws of physics to produce a reasonable 12MP image. Check for yourself before purchase! I wouldn't trust this comment unless it's reworded slightly. Are you sure that you didn't mean to type something like : I wouldn't trust a small-sensor camera's ISO 12,800 offering . . . Many cameras, including the F100fd and some from Casio, Panasonic and Olympus offer very high ISO settings at reduced resolution, and that doesn't mean that these cameras can't be trusted. When used at lower, more reasonable ISO settings they can produce very good images. The F100fd's image quality at ISO 12,800 isn't very good, but nobody that is at all familiar with small sensor cameras would expect it to be. In fact, it's not all that bad. It won't produce great or very good quality 4"x6" snapshots, but what it does produce will be usable, and better than what many other small sensor cameras can do at much lower ISO settings. Reduced resolution or pixel binning leaves a lot to be desired, but it's better than the alternative, which is usually a totally unusable image. Does the F100fd offer 12MP at ISO 12,800? If so, I would expect the results to be completely unusable, and hence I would have considerable reduced trust in a camera (or should it be the company?), which has unusable settings?. As I said, I would advise the buyer to check before purchase just what the capabilities actually are, and whether the results are acceptable for their own applications. But the question here is about the dynamic range, rather than the absolute ISO sensitivity. It may be that the other capabilities of the camera would offset poor high-ISO image quality. Here I would expect manual control (at least exposure compensation), and perhaps RAW output. David |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:53:24 GMT, David J Taylor wrote:
Many cameras, including the F100fd and some from Casio, Panasonic and Olympus offer very high ISO settings at reduced resolution, and that doesn't mean that these cameras can't be trusted. When used at lower, more reasonable ISO settings they can produce very good images. The F100fd's image quality at ISO 12,800 isn't very good, but nobody that is at all familiar with small sensor cameras would expect it to be. In fact, it's not all that bad. It won't produce great or very good quality 4"x6" snapshots, but what it does produce will be usable, and better than what many other small sensor cameras can do at much lower ISO settings. Reduced resolution or pixel binning leaves a lot to be desired, but it's better than the alternative, which is usually a totally unusable image. Does the F100fd offer 12MP at ISO 12,800? If so, I would expect the results to be completely unusable, and hence I would have considerable reduced trust in a camera (or should it be the company?), which has unusable settings?. As I said, I would advise the buyer to check before purchase just what the capabilities actually are, and whether the results are acceptable for their own applications. David, why do you *insist* on ignoring the most important points only to come back with a reply addressing a minor point that shows that you'd rather attempt to prove that what you said was correct if only your mistaken assumption was true? It appears that you didn't even read the sentences that you quoted above, where I explicitly stated that the F100fd offers ISO 12,800 at reduced resolution. No, the F100fd does NOT offer 12MP at ISO 12,800. That ISO is only available at resolutions of 3mp and lower. If you read my reply to the OP you could have followed the links to reviews that showed what the ISO 12,800 results look like instead of assuming the worst. As you quoted but evidently didn't read, the ISO 12,800 IQ "isn't very good", but it is quite usable for 4"x6" snapshots. It may not produce the best 4"x6" image quality you've ever seen, but it's more acceptable than most other small sensor cameras that also have reduced resolution, high ISO modes. More worrying is that you completely ignored my point that even if the ISO 12,800 results were bad, it shouldn't cause someone to assume, as you did, that it would not only make the results completely unusable, but that it should be grounds for not trusting the camera or even any other cameras that Fuji makes, which is what you actually typed. That's complete nonsense and I'm sure that there are other manufacturers and their cameras that you'd never judge so unreasonably. As I said, Casio, Panasonic and Olympus are also "guilty" of producing cameras with reduced resolution, high ISO modes. Do you want to stand by your statement and hint that Casio, Panasonic and Olympus cameras should be prejudged, and you'll also have "considerable reduced trust" for those brands as well? But the question here is about the dynamic range, rather than the absolute ISO sensitivity. It may be that the other capabilities of the camera would offset poor high-ISO image quality. Here I would expect manual control (at least exposure compensation), and perhaps RAW output. Yes, the other capabilities "may" offset poor high-ISO image quality, but you don't seem to want us to assume that to be the case as you've already let us know that the camera and its manufacturer probably can't be trusted. Manual control and RAW output aren't needed however, to get very good image quality. As reviews noted, Fuji's F30 (or perhaps the F31) produced better jpeg results out of the camera than the much larger, more sophisticated S6000 which used the same sensor. When the S6000's RAW images were processed and compared, only then did they approach the same image quality, but didn't actually surpass it. Surprising perhaps, as this isn't usually the case with other brands, but Fuji seems to be able to get more out of in-camera jpeg processing than other companies manage. The F100fd's expanded dynamic range, by the way, is only available at ISOs up to and including ISO 400, and at those ISOs image quality is noticeably better than the other cameras managed. According to the reviews and the test images, Fuji's DR appears to work pretty well. But as we've both already said, solving the OP's blown highlights problem might be solved by simply using some exposure compensation, rather than requiring a new camera. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Which camera has the best dynamic range?
ASAAR,
It does not concern me that we disagree, and am happy to stand my ground on any technical argument, and to learn from others who know more. However, many aspects of image quality are subjective, and there will never be 100% agreement. You see similar disagreements in audio as well - those who prefer the "vinyl" sound. Personally, I tend to trust something less if it appears to be marketing driven, rather than if it is engineering driven, and hence I feel that one should be wary of any small-sensor camera which offers ISO 12800, whoever manufacturers it. The OP should check the results for themselves, and judge whether that are acceptable. I do like the idea behind the Fuji dual-sensor CCD, and If the results at lower ISOs offer what is needed, then the camera may be an excellent tool for the OP's job. David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
camera with high dynamic range ?? | minnesotti | Digital Photography | 15 | July 17th 06 02:49 AM |
dynamic range | Paul Furman | Digital SLR Cameras | 36 | February 22nd 06 04:05 AM |
Are we ignored regarding dynamic range? | ThomasH | Digital Photography | 43 | January 1st 05 11:32 PM |
Dynamic range of an image | Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) | Digital Photography | 143 | August 27th 04 07:35 PM |
LCD Monitors dynamic range | David J Taylor | Digital Photography | 6 | July 26th 04 06:47 PM |