If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
I guess the serious posters here don't use Picasa, but thought it might
interest some lurkers or future searchers. I use Picasa as a cheap and cheerful filing system that provides simple basic editing (mostly I only need cropping and straightening). I also write technical reports containing photographs of broken bits of industrial plant, using Word. To keep the final file size down I tend to use the Picasa "export" function to downsize the images to 1024 pixels. (I know I could downsize further without affecting the printed report, but this lets people pull reasonable images out of the Word file later if they want to). My reports look fine on screen (including print preview) and print perfectly on a mono Laserjet and a Brother inkjet. But I use a Lexmark (CS410dn) if I want hard copies. And these exported JPEGs, when inserted into Word, don't then print correctly on the Lexmark, they print in the correct sized frame on the paper but the image part is enlarged, showing only the top left hand corner of the image, and cropping the rest. After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. (I just had to tell someone). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
In article ,
newshound wrote: I guess the serious posters here don't use Picasa, but thought it might interest some lurkers or future searchers. I use Picasa as a cheap and cheerful filing system that provides simple basic editing (mostly I only need cropping and straightening). I also write technical reports containing photographs of broken bits of industrial plant, using Word. To keep the final file size down I tend to use the Picasa "export" function to downsize the images to 1024 pixels. (I know I could downsize further without affecting the printed report, but this lets people pull reasonable images out of the Word file later if they want to). My reports look fine on screen (including print preview) and print perfectly on a mono Laserjet and a Brother inkjet. But I use a Lexmark (CS410dn) if I want hard copies. And these exported JPEGs, when inserted into Word, don't then print correctly on the Lexmark, they print in the correct sized frame on the paper but the image part is enlarged, showing only the top left hand corner of the image, and cropping the rest. that suggests word is the problem in how it's placing/sizing the jpeg, not the exported jpeg itself. what does the jpg show for resolution? what happens if you use another word processing or page layout app? After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. that doesn't mean it's a bug in picasa. if the jpeg from picasa is valid, then it's word and/or lexmark. how did you validate the jpeg? or did you? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
On 27/10/2017 16:23, nospam wrote:
In article , newshound wrote: I guess the serious posters here don't use Picasa, but thought it might interest some lurkers or future searchers. I use Picasa as a cheap and cheerful filing system that provides simple basic editing (mostly I only need cropping and straightening). I also write technical reports containing photographs of broken bits of industrial plant, using Word. To keep the final file size down I tend to use the Picasa "export" function to downsize the images to 1024 pixels. (I know I could downsize further without affecting the printed report, but this lets people pull reasonable images out of the Word file later if they want to). My reports look fine on screen (including print preview) and print perfectly on a mono Laserjet and a Brother inkjet. But I use a Lexmark (CS410dn) if I want hard copies. And these exported JPEGs, when inserted into Word, don't then print correctly on the Lexmark, they print in the correct sized frame on the paper but the image part is enlarged, showing only the top left hand corner of the image, and cropping the rest. that suggests word is the problem in how it's placing/sizing the jpeg, not the exported jpeg itself. But it is *only* exported files that have the problem, and *only* on the Lexmark. They print fine from other apps (including picasa) so I agree that Word is probably involved in some way. But Word versions 15 years apart behave the same way. what does the jpg show for resolution? what happens if you use another word processing or page layout app? After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. that doesn't mean it's a bug in picasa. if the jpeg from picasa is valid, then it's word and/or lexmark. But they behave fine with picasa files that havn't been compressed by Picasa export. So I think there is something wrong in the file header which either the Word print engine or the Lexmark is getting confused about. And the fact that just importing the file into Paint and saving it again clears the fault points to something in the JPEG. how did you validate the jpeg? or did you? I don't know how to. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:11:06 +0100, newshound
wrote: On 27/10/2017 16:23, nospam wrote: In article , newshound wrote: I guess the serious posters here don't use Picasa, but thought it might interest some lurkers or future searchers. I use Picasa as a cheap and cheerful filing system that provides simple basic editing (mostly I only need cropping and straightening). I also write technical reports containing photographs of broken bits of industrial plant, using Word. To keep the final file size down I tend to use the Picasa "export" function to downsize the images to 1024 pixels. (I know I could downsize further without affecting the printed report, but this lets people pull reasonable images out of the Word file later if they want to). My reports look fine on screen (including print preview) and print perfectly on a mono Laserjet and a Brother inkjet. But I use a Lexmark (CS410dn) if I want hard copies. And these exported JPEGs, when inserted into Word, don't then print correctly on the Lexmark, they print in the correct sized frame on the paper but the image part is enlarged, showing only the top left hand corner of the image, and cropping the rest. that suggests word is the problem in how it's placing/sizing the jpeg, not the exported jpeg itself. But it is *only* exported files that have the problem, and *only* on the Lexmark. They print fine from other apps (including picasa) so I agree that Word is probably involved in some way. But Word versions 15 years apart behave the same way. what does the jpg show for resolution? what happens if you use another word processing or page layout app? After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. that doesn't mean it's a bug in picasa. if the jpeg from picasa is valid, then it's word and/or lexmark. But they behave fine with picasa files that havn't been compressed by Picasa export. So I think there is something wrong in the file header which either the Word print engine or the Lexmark is getting confused about. And the fact that just importing the file into Paint and saving it again clears the fault points to something in the JPEG. how did you validate the jpeg? or did you? I don't know how to. The printer dialogue should be specific to the Lexmark, and there is probably a setting in there that you are overlooking. If you see the same printer dialogue for all your printers, you need to find the correct drivers for the Lexmark and install them. Another option might be to resize the jpg and save to a new file before printing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
In article ,
newshound wrote: After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. that doesn't mean it's a bug in picasa. if the jpeg from picasa is valid, then it's word and/or lexmark. But they behave fine with picasa files that havn't been compressed by Picasa export. So I think there is something wrong in the file header which either the Word print engine or the Lexmark is getting confused about. And the fact that just importing the file into Paint and saving it again clears the fault points to something in the JPEG. different doesn't mean one is wrong. can you post a sample jpeg exported from each app? the content of the photos is completely irrelevant, as long as the sizing issue can be duplicated. take a photo of something random, or even fill it with black. no need to share internal photos if you don't want to. without examining the files, it sounds like the resolution tag, which is sometimes used for initial image sizing/placement in some apps, is set differently. if that's the case, there is probably a default setting which can be changed. how did you validate the jpeg? or did you? I don't know how to. that would be a no. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
On Friday, October 27, 2017 at 11:00:20 AM UTC-4, newshound wrote:
I guess the serious posters here don't use Picasa, but thought it might interest some lurkers or future searchers. I use Picasa as a cheap and cheerful filing system that provides simple basic editing (mostly I only need cropping and straightening). I also write technical reports containing photographs of broken bits of industrial plant, using Word. To keep the final file size down I tend to use the Picasa "export" function to downsize the images to 1024 pixels. (I know I could downsize further without affecting the printed report, but this lets people pull reasonable images out of the Word file later if they want to). My reports look fine on screen (including print preview) and print perfectly on a mono Laserjet and a Brother inkjet. But I use a Lexmark (CS410dn) if I want hard copies. And these exported JPEGs, when inserted into Word, don't then print correctly on the Lexmark, they print in the correct sized frame on the paper but the image part is enlarged, showing only the top left hand corner of the image, and cropping the rest. After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. (I just had to tell someone). Picasa has one great advantage that is seldom discussed. It makes new copies of the photos on the hard drive, and so you can ruin the Picasa copy and still have the original untouched image on the hard drive. Also, it is (was) free. I put a copy onto a CD-R after the program was discontinued. For sharpening, cropping, color correcting, straightening,and simple retouching, it is just fine. It can also e-mail images,and burn them to CD-R. Mort Linder |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
In article ,
wrote: Picasa has one great advantage that is seldom discussed. It makes new copies of the photos on the hard drive, and so you can ruin the Picasa copy and still have the original untouched image on the hard drive. if you're relying on an image editor to do backups, you have problems you don't even realize. you should always have backup copies, no matter what app is used, or even if no app is used. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , wrote: Picasa has one great advantage that is seldom discussed. It makes new copies of the photos on the hard drive, and so you can ruin the Picasa copy and still have the original untouched image on the hard drive. if you're relying on an image editor to do backups, you have problems you don't even realize. you should always have backup copies, no matter what app is used, or even if no app is used. Oki... I hear duplicates, not backups... What's a Picasa. Is it a Goog thang... I liked Picasso, the painter... A tad miss understood dude but he made a living... -- teleportation kills |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
On 27/10/2017 21:39, Bill W wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:11:06 +0100, newshound wrote: On 27/10/2017 16:23, nospam wrote: In article , newshound wrote: I guess the serious posters here don't use Picasa, but thought it might interest some lurkers or future searchers. I use Picasa as a cheap and cheerful filing system that provides simple basic editing (mostly I only need cropping and straightening). I also write technical reports containing photographs of broken bits of industrial plant, using Word. To keep the final file size down I tend to use the Picasa "export" function to downsize the images to 1024 pixels. (I know I could downsize further without affecting the printed report, but this lets people pull reasonable images out of the Word file later if they want to). My reports look fine on screen (including print preview) and print perfectly on a mono Laserjet and a Brother inkjet. But I use a Lexmark (CS410dn) if I want hard copies. And these exported JPEGs, when inserted into Word, don't then print correctly on the Lexmark, they print in the correct sized frame on the paper but the image part is enlarged, showing only the top left hand corner of the image, and cropping the rest. that suggests word is the problem in how it's placing/sizing the jpeg, not the exported jpeg itself. But it is *only* exported files that have the problem, and *only* on the Lexmark. They print fine from other apps (including picasa) so I agree that Word is probably involved in some way. But Word versions 15 years apart behave the same way. what does the jpg show for resolution? what happens if you use another word processing or page layout app? After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. that doesn't mean it's a bug in picasa. if the jpeg from picasa is valid, then it's word and/or lexmark. But they behave fine with picasa files that havn't been compressed by Picasa export. So I think there is something wrong in the file header which either the Word print engine or the Lexmark is getting confused about. And the fact that just importing the file into Paint and saving it again clears the fault points to something in the JPEG. how did you validate the jpeg? or did you? I don't know how to. The printer dialogue should be specific to the Lexmark, and there is probably a setting in there that you are overlooking. If you see the same printer dialogue for all your printers, you need to find the correct drivers for the Lexmark and install them. Drivers was the first think I looked at. I'm just printing a word file. The print preview is fine. The lexmark output fails, other printers are OK. Another option might be to resize the jpg and save to a new file before printing. That's what I am doing. I was using Picasa to do the resize because that's what I use for cropping and straightening (and maybe occasionally a tweak on fill, contrast, or colour). My point is that the resized picasa file fails to print *to one specific printer* when put into the word document. But if I import the file into paint and re-save it before the insert then everything is fine. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Picasa bug (only affects Lexmark printers?)
On 27/10/2017 21:48, nospam wrote:
In article , newshound wrote: After much trial and error, I've found it is the Picasa Export which causes the problem. If you open and then save the JPEG in Paint (overwriting the original file) the problem goes away. that doesn't mean it's a bug in picasa. if the jpeg from picasa is valid, then it's word and/or lexmark. But they behave fine with picasa files that havn't been compressed by Picasa export. So I think there is something wrong in the file header which either the Word print engine or the Lexmark is getting confused about. And the fact that just importing the file into Paint and saving it again clears the fault points to something in the JPEG. different doesn't mean one is wrong. can you post a sample jpeg exported from each app? Well I could, but as far as I am concerned I have a fix. I can certainly do that if anyone confirms they would like to do some investigation. I was partly posting this in case anyone already knew about it, or so that someone Googling the same problem in the future would find it. the content of the photos is completely irrelevant, as long as the sizing issue can be duplicated. take a photo of something random, or even fill it with black. no need to share internal photos if you don't want to. Happy to share something. With a solid black image I wouldn't be able to see that the process had failed. without examining the files, it sounds like the resolution tag, which is sometimes used for initial image sizing/placement in some apps, is set differently. Yes, that was one of my guesses but I am not all that familiar with this stuff. if that's the case, there is probably a default setting which can be changed. Yes but what setting? In Word, you check page layout via print preview. And you expect the printer to give you the same thing (although occasionally a line of text spills on to the next page). how did you validate the jpeg? or did you? I don't know how to. that would be a no. Indeed. Suggestions would be useful. The export files look fine in several different viewers. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compact Flash AFFECTS Focus and Quality??????? | Wolfgang Weisselberg | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | September 20th 08 11:27 AM |
All in one Printer - Lexmark | Tzortzakakis Dimitrios[_2_] | Digital Photography | 0 | May 28th 08 08:48 PM |
dRebel 2000: what's exactly the 1.6 multiplying factor and how it affects my current 35mm lenses? | PnP! | Digital Photography | 12 | August 30th 04 10:20 PM |