If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 12:29 AM, Ron C wrote:
On 9/17/2017 11:24 PM, PeterN wrote: While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 IMHO way over cropped. From that shot I get the feeling you've never been a surfer. (For me .. context is missing) My personal style tends towards heavy cropping. See the NEF files I posted in response to the Duck. And you are right, I have never been a surfer, nor will I ever be one. Since I plan to shoot a surfing competition in a few weeks, and would like to give some shots to the organization, how much context should I leave in? Since I am going to give them the shots, I would like to give them what they want. Yes, I have done such wipe-outs in my younger days. [but no longer even try... ] Lately I've been thinking about getting a good waterproof camera and going out to get some serious in water shots. ...maybe next season. I used to dive. I found an Ikelite housing worked well. I used it with my Nikkormat for years. However, if you just want casual family shots, You can get a P&S for a lot less money. https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=waterproof+point+and+shoot+camer a&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=177271484533&hvpos=1t1&hvnetw= g&hvrand=14427954963387958466&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqm t=b&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9004545&h vtargid=kwd-4566510721&ref=pd_sl_2pg9uacdom_b https://tinyurl.com/yco2vvya -- PeterN |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 11:19 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/18/2017 12:29 AM, Ron C wrote: On 9/17/2017 11:24 PM, PeterN wrote: While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 IMHO way over cropped. From that shot I get the feeling you've never been a surfer. (For me .. context is missing) My personal style tends towards heavy cropping. See the NEF files I posted in response to the Duck. And you are right, I have never been a surfer, nor will I ever be one. Since I plan to shoot a surfing competition in a few weeks, and would like to give some shots to the organization, how much context should I leave in? Since I am going to give them the shots, I would like to give them what they want. Yes, I have done such wipe-outs in my younger days. [but no longer even try... ] Lately I've been thinking about getting a good waterproof camera and going out to get some serious in water shots. ...maybe next season. I used to dive. I found an Ikelite housing worked well. I used it with my Nikkormat for years. However, if you just want casual family shots, You can get a P&S for a lot less money. https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=waterproof+point+and+shoot+camer a&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=177271484533&hvpos=1t1&hvnetw= g&hvrand=14427954963387958466&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqm t=b&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9004545&h vtargid=kwd-4566510721&ref=pd_sl_2pg9uacdom_b https://tinyurl.com/yco2vvya Ikelite seems to make good stuff at a good price point. I've been looking at the DLM200 Canon SL1 package or maybe their new SL2 package. Turns out it would cost less to buy the full kit w/camera than to buy a housing for any of my cameras. ~~ As for context, I would want to get a feeling of time. Some indication of how the situation developed or is developing gives a better feeling for the action and perhaps emotion. I can still vividly recall the feeling of looking down the wave during a wipe-out. Having been there I have some empathy for the situation and would want to capture a bit of that feeling. You have the choice of how he got there, where he's going, or [in some cases] some unusual or spectacular static shot. Dropping in to a wave or pulling out tend to be the most dynamic. [IMHO] Resist the tight crop in favor of the story. OK, I think that's enough of my babbling. ~~ Last I checked the surf looks big but choppy and blown out today. -- == Later... Ron C -- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 Hmmm... PN crop time. However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. In that case there is an issue with your post processing, because there is something odd about that fuzzy hot-spot to the right of the board. I was facing SSW. You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 My processing and crop were different, with surfing shots, the actual surf/wave provides important context. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 My rendition of that one. BTW: that might be the better shot of the two. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. Monochrome might not be the best choice for surf shots, but who knows? -- Regards, Savageduck |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On Sep 18, 2017, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com): On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 Hmmm... PN crop time. However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. In that case there is an issue with your post processing, because there is something odd about that fuzzy hot-spot to the right of the board. I was facing SSW. You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 My processing and crop were different, with surfing shots, the actual surf/wave provides important context. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 My rendition of that one. BTW: that might be the better shot of the two. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Oops!! Try this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a4v4akvj9e57vqi/PN_surfing_5875.jpg Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. Monochrome might not be the best choice for surf shots, but who knows? -- Regards, Savageduck |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 11:03 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. I was facing SSW.* You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. OK, I took a look at the raw shots and I'm not sure but believe there's a confusing context. From what I'm seeing these shots look like high energy exits from a wave that was about to close. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like the guy was riding from left to right and kicked out (to avoid needing to paddle back out) however the energy in the photo seems to be going from right to left leaving me with a confused feeling about what just happened. If so, I'm guessing that snapping the shot a few moments earlier would have been a bit less dynamic but would have the energy in the right direction. -- == Later.... Ron C -- |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 2:04 PM, Ron C wrote:
On 9/18/2017 11:03 AM, PeterN wrote: On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. I was facing SSW.* You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. OK, I took a look at the raw shots and I'm not sure but believe there's a confusing context. From what I'm seeing these shots look like high energy exits from a wave that was about to close. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like the guy was riding from left to right and kicked out (to avoid needing to paddle back out) however the energy in the photo seems to be going from right to left leaving me with a confused feeling about what just happened. If so, I'm guessing that snapping the shot a few moments earlier would have been a bit less dynamic but would have the energy in the right direction. In most cases the surfers were riding from left to right. However, IIRC I have a few that were riding from right to left. In any event I may have some just prior to the wife-out. I will look again, in a few days. I don't understand enough about the sport to fully understand what you mean by energy, but I will look at the images with an energy concept in mind. The wind was against the tide. -- PeterN |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 1:17 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Sep 18, 2017, Savageduck wrote (in iganews.com): On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 Hmmm... PN crop time. However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. In that case there is an issue with your post processing, because there is something odd about that fuzzy hot-spot to the right of the board. I was facing SSW. You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 My processing and crop were different, with surfing shots, the actual surf/wave provides important context. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 My rendition of that one. BTW: that might be the better shot of the two. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Oops!! Try this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a4v4akvj9e57vqi/PN_surfing_5875.jpg Needs to be cropped. How much is always a judgement call. Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. Monochrome might not be the best choice for surf shots, but who knows? IMHO many sports shots can look more dynamic in monochrome. I am inot intending my shots to sell location. -- PeterN |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 9/18/2017 1:17 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 18, 2017, Savageduck wrote (in iganews.com): On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 Hmmm... PN crop time. However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. In that case there is an issue with your post processing, because there is something odd about that fuzzy hot-spot to the right of the board. I was facing SSW. You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 My processing and crop were different, with surfing shots, the actual surf/wave provides important context. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 My rendition of that one. BTW: that might be the better shot of the two. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Oops!! Try this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a4v4akvj9e57vqi/PN_surfing_5875.jpg Needs to be cropped. How much is always a judgement call. It was cropped. In my judgement just enough. I also changed the aspect ratio. I also dealt with the CA and fringing which was contributing to color noise, and I didn’t use a heavy hand on the ACR Dehaze. Your severe crops do not always benefit the image. What would you have cropped in the case of these two shots to get close to your originally shared image? The crop you made on your originally shared rendition of *5672* is too tight, and removes most of the wave, any interpretation of energy in that wave, and the context of the surfer’s action. Having the complete image with the context of the wave, and surfer tells the whole story, including the wave energy the surfer is dealing with. Crop to just the surfer, and the entire image suffers. I believe that is what Ron was trying to tell you. BTW: I have been a surfer whenever the opportunity arrises for over 40 years, and I have been a more frequent, and enthusiastic Windsurfer since 1974. Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. Monochrome might not be the best choice for surf shots, but who knows? IMHO many sports shots can look more dynamic in monochrome. I am inot intending my shots to sell location. It always depends on the shot, how it is rendered, and presented. Color is not always a tool to sell location, and as I said, B&W MIGHT not be the best choice for surfing shots. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 6:35 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/18/2017 2:04 PM, Ron C wrote: On 9/18/2017 11:03 AM, PeterN wrote: On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. I was facing SSW.* You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. OK, I took a look at the raw shots and I'm not sure but believe there's a confusing context. From what I'm seeing these shots look like high energy exits from a wave that was about to close. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like the guy was riding from left to right and kicked out (to avoid needing to paddle back out) however the energy in the photo seems to be going from right to left leaving me with a confused feeling about what just happened. If so, I'm guessing that snapping the shot a few moments earlier would have been a bit less dynamic but would have the energy in the right direction. In most cases the surfers were riding from left to right. However, IIRC I have a few that were riding from right to left. In any event I may have some just prior to the wife-out. I will look again, in a few days. I don't understand enough about the sport to fully understand what you mean by energy, but I will look at the images with an energy concept in mind. The wind was against the tide. There are several tricks that take a surfer up the face of a wave along with a direction reversal. A trick you may want to look up is an alley-oop. ~~ Contrary to popular belief the phase of the tide has little to do with wave formation or wave shape, thus wind against the tide is kind of meaningless. However I'm sure you will find surfers that will argue the point. ~~ Enjoy your beach visits and photo adventures there. -- == Later... Ron C -- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Surfing Novices
On 9/18/2017 7:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 9/18/2017 1:17 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 18, 2017, Savageduck wrote (in iganews.com): On Sep 18, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 9/18/2017 2:32 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Sep 17, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): While you guys were arguing, I went out to take advantage of heavy surf. While the surf was great, this is an imge of the ability of most of the surfers I observed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vcxbxh9oqliycro/20170917_surfing_5872.jpg?dl=0 That is a pretty good capture, and the D500 is doing what it does best. That's why I got it. As far as the surfer’s ability goes, he was out there wasn’t he? Yep!. There is a surfing competition coming up there next month. I was really hoping to get some of the better surfers practicing. There were few that were decent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q49tiud6ywe5d5m/20170917_surfing_5859.jpg?dl=0 Hmmm... PN crop time. However, there are some things which I find odd. What is it with his right hand, especially the fingers? Then with the shot taken right into the Sun/flare behind the board there is highlight clipping, his body is put into shadow deep enough to hide detail, and the skin tones seem somewhat reddish. It was a foggy day. Had there been sun it would have been from my left. In that case there is an issue with your post processing, because there is something odd about that fuzzy hot-spot to the right of the board. I was facing SSW. You can check the exact position of the Sun on TPE. The images were taken at Gilgo Beach, At about 10:00. I applied the ACR fog remover, sharpened, and are you sitting, noise reduction. Here are the RAW files to play with: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x3snxtwr76t53xx/20170917_surfing_5872.NEF?dl=0 My processing and crop were different, with surfing shots, the actual surf/wave provides important context. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Another wipeout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x75vd7gk9mc239h/20170917_surfing_5875.NEF?dl=0 My rendition of that one. BTW: that might be the better shot of the two. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ipn74lo6fu2jb5g/PN_surfing_5872.jpg Oops!! Try this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a4v4akvj9e57vqi/PN_surfing_5875.jpg Needs to be cropped. How much is always a judgement call. It was cropped. In my judgement just enough. I also changed the aspect ratio. I also dealt with the CA and fringing which was contributing to color noise, and I didn’t use a heavy hand on the ACR Dehaze. Your severe crops do not always benefit the image. What would you have cropped in the case of these two shots to get close to your originally shared image? The crop you made on your originally shared rendition of *5672* is too tight, and removes most of the wave, any interpretation of energy in that wave, and the context of the surfer’s action. Having the complete image with the context of the wave, and surfer tells the whole story, including the wave energy the surfer is dealing with. Crop to just the surfer, and the entire image suffers. I believe that is what Ron was trying to tell you. For over sixty five years, I have cropped images. i used to call it image mining. I am not likely to stop now, unless the image doesn't call for it. If I understand what you and Ron are saying about context, is that more of the wave can show the context. As non-duffer I am looking for the form of the surfer, as an abstraction. We are seeking a different meaning from the same image. If I cropped this image, it would convey a totally different feeling. https://www.dropbox.com/s/xjtalhb8vo60yrw/Sunflower%20Field.jpg?dl=0 BTW: I have been a surfer whenever the opportunity arrises for over 40 years, and I have been a more frequent, and enthusiastic Windsurfer since 1974. Since I plan to do monochrome conversions, I am not overly concerned about the color. Monochrome might not be the best choice for surf shots, but who knows? IMHO many sports shots can look more dynamic in monochrome. I am inot intending my shots to sell location. It always depends on the shot, how it is rendered, and presented. Color is not always a tool to sell location, and as I said, B&W MIGHT not be the best choice for surfing shots. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Surfing with a motorcycle | Sandman | Digital Photography | 2 | August 4th 15 02:59 PM |
EVF's for novices | Irwell | Digital Photography | 1 | August 11th 10 04:15 AM |
EVF's for novices | bobwilliams | Digital Photography | 2 | August 10th 10 05:36 AM |
Surfing pics | DD | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | July 4th 06 06:30 AM |
Website for DSLR/SLR Amateurs & Novices | Sharp Shooter | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | June 7th 05 09:04 AM |