Difficult technical question on ISO & light

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 05:50:16 GMT, Gregory W Blank
wrote:

You judge the world by POS terms. (& I don't mean Point and Shoot
in this case,...figure it out ).

Potentially Optimal Solution ?


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Please remove the "_" when replying via email

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 05:50:16 GMT, Gregory W Blank
wrote:

You judge the world by POS terms. (& I don't mean Point and Shoot
in this case,...figure it out ).

Potentially Optimal Solution ?


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Please remove the "_" when replying via email

Frank Pittel wrote:
In rec.photo.darkroom Gymmy Bob wrote:
: Your camera has a PCB in it also unless your still wind it up like a Mickey
: Mouse toy.

My Zone VI has no PCB board in it. Neither do the Russian cameras I use.


I think he means the average 35mm camera, even my 1978 Konica TC has
some electronics, probably has a small PCB somewhere in there. Funny
thing is I can ignore it's electronics, if the battery goes flat, the
camera still works fine. Been wondering about picking up either a hand
held meter, or a new camera. Would like something bigger, but even used
mid-format stuff is way too pricey. Heck it makes digital look
cheap.....

My first "real" camera was a 1975 Russian made Zenit E, no batteries,
58mm f/2 lens, carved out of a solid block of lead from the weight
(nearly 1kg).

W

Frank Pittel wrote:
In rec.photo.darkroom Gymmy Bob wrote:
: Your camera has a PCB in it also unless your still wind it up like a Mickey
: Mouse toy.

My Zone VI has no PCB board in it. Neither do the Russian cameras I use.


I think he means the average 35mm camera, even my 1978 Konica TC has
some electronics, probably has a small PCB somewhere in there. Funny
thing is I can ignore it's electronics, if the battery goes flat, the
camera still works fine. Been wondering about picking up either a hand
held meter, or a new camera. Would like something bigger, but even used
mid-format stuff is way too pricey. Heck it makes digital look
cheap.....

My first "real" camera was a 1975 Russian made Zenit E, no batteries,
58mm f/2 lens, carved out of a solid block of lead from the weight
(nearly 1kg).

W

In rec.photo.darkroom The Wogster wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote:
: In rec.photo.darkroom Gymmy Bob wrote:
: : Your camera has a PCB in it also unless your still wind it up like a Mickey
: : Mouse toy.
:
: My Zone VI has no PCB board in it. Neither do the Russian cameras I use.
:

: I think he means the average 35mm camera, even my 1978 Konica TC has
: some electronics, probably has a small PCB somewhere in there. Funny
: thing is I can ignore it's electronics, if the battery goes flat, the
: camera still works fine. Been wondering about picking up either a hand
: held meter, or a new camera. Would like something bigger, but even used
: mid-format stuff is way too pricey. Heck it makes digital look
: cheap.....

I can't help that jim bob has such a limited mental capacity to understand that
there are more types of film cameras then 35mm disposables and 35mm P&Ss.

: My first "real" camera was a 1975 Russian made Zenit E, no batteries,
: 58mm f/2 lens, carved out of a solid block of lead from the weight
: (nearly 1kg).

I have one of them also. I often show it and my Mamiya 645 to people that complain
that 4x5 cameras are to heavy for field use. :-)
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------