A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

best compression for saving photos in jpeg?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 23rd 04, 12:49 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jürgen Eidt wrote:
"Ron Hunter" schrieb

Brian wrote:

What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned
colour photo in jpeg?



Use the minimum compression that will give you the file size you need for
your purpose. The more you compress, the more data you lose. Always save
the original. Remember, HD space is something like $.50US a gigabyte
these days, so adding HD space is a pretty cheap alternative.



I can second that.
And 95% quality level really gives you the optimal value to start with.
A 100% doesn't scale to the gain you get for quality and everything less is
covered by the 50 cent/GB (nice value BTW )

Yes, considering that only a very few years ago, a 1GB HD cost $2200!!!!
Amazing!

--
Ron Hunter
  #12  
Old December 23rd 04, 12:49 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jürgen Eidt wrote:
"Ron Hunter" schrieb

Brian wrote:

What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned
colour photo in jpeg?



Use the minimum compression that will give you the file size you need for
your purpose. The more you compress, the more data you lose. Always save
the original. Remember, HD space is something like $.50US a gigabyte
these days, so adding HD space is a pretty cheap alternative.



I can second that.
And 95% quality level really gives you the optimal value to start with.
A 100% doesn't scale to the gain you get for quality and everything less is
covered by the 50 cent/GB (nice value BTW )

Yes, considering that only a very few years ago, a 1GB HD cost $2200!!!!
Amazing!

--
Ron Hunter
  #13  
Old December 23rd 04, 01:32 PM
Bruce Lewis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Hunter writes:

Always save the original. Remember, HD space is something like
$.50US a gigabyte these days, so adding HD space is a pretty cheap
alternative.


I agree that you should always save the original. However, isn't that
50cent number ignoring the time/money required to keep things backed up?


--

http://ourdoings.com/ Let your digital photos organize themselves.
Sign up today for a 7-day free trial.
  #14  
Old December 24th 04, 12:59 PM
Brian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim" wrote:


"Brian" wrote in message
.. .
What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned
colour photo in jpeg?

"Best" with respect to what?
"Best quality" = least amount of compression
"Best size" = most amount of compression.
Most people select a medium compression value, and that might be OK for you
provided that you do not edit the image very many times.
Jim

I just want to scan some camera photos that I borrowed.
I may not have access to the photos again as they will be sent
overseas, so I need a good scan job.

Regards Brian
  #15  
Old December 24th 04, 12:59 PM
Brian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim" wrote:


"Brian" wrote in message
.. .
What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned
colour photo in jpeg?

"Best" with respect to what?
"Best quality" = least amount of compression
"Best size" = most amount of compression.
Most people select a medium compression value, and that might be OK for you
provided that you do not edit the image very many times.
Jim

I just want to scan some camera photos that I borrowed.
I may not have access to the photos again as they will be sent
overseas, so I need a good scan job.

Regards Brian
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JPEG compression James Ramaley Digital Photography 14 October 26th 04 01:41 AM
Ron Baird - Kodak DX7630 high jpeg compression Ron Baird Digital Photography 9 August 24th 04 03:19 PM
Attn: Ron Baird - Kodak DX7630 high jpeg compression Ron Hunter Digital Photography 9 August 9th 04 12:04 PM
JPEG compression options -- can anybody explain? Beowulf Digital Photography 3 August 4th 04 02:17 AM
A short study on digicam's fixed jpeg compression ratio Heikki Siltala Digital Photography 23 July 28th 04 08:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.