If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Jürgen Eidt wrote:
"Ron Hunter" schrieb Brian wrote: What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned colour photo in jpeg? Use the minimum compression that will give you the file size you need for your purpose. The more you compress, the more data you lose. Always save the original. Remember, HD space is something like $.50US a gigabyte these days, so adding HD space is a pretty cheap alternative. I can second that. And 95% quality level really gives you the optimal value to start with. A 100% doesn't scale to the gain you get for quality and everything less is covered by the 50 cent/GB (nice value BTW ) Yes, considering that only a very few years ago, a 1GB HD cost $2200!!!! Amazing! -- Ron Hunter |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Jürgen Eidt wrote:
"Ron Hunter" schrieb Brian wrote: What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned colour photo in jpeg? Use the minimum compression that will give you the file size you need for your purpose. The more you compress, the more data you lose. Always save the original. Remember, HD space is something like $.50US a gigabyte these days, so adding HD space is a pretty cheap alternative. I can second that. And 95% quality level really gives you the optimal value to start with. A 100% doesn't scale to the gain you get for quality and everything less is covered by the 50 cent/GB (nice value BTW ) Yes, considering that only a very few years ago, a 1GB HD cost $2200!!!! Amazing! -- Ron Hunter |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Hunter writes:
Always save the original. Remember, HD space is something like $.50US a gigabyte these days, so adding HD space is a pretty cheap alternative. I agree that you should always save the original. However, isn't that 50cent number ignoring the time/money required to keep things backed up? -- http://ourdoings.com/ Let your digital photos organize themselves. Sign up today for a 7-day free trial. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim" wrote:
"Brian" wrote in message .. . What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned colour photo in jpeg? "Best" with respect to what? "Best quality" = least amount of compression "Best size" = most amount of compression. Most people select a medium compression value, and that might be OK for you provided that you do not edit the image very many times. Jim I just want to scan some camera photos that I borrowed. I may not have access to the photos again as they will be sent overseas, so I need a good scan job. Regards Brian |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim" wrote:
"Brian" wrote in message .. . What is the best compression (1 - 100%) to use when saving a scanned colour photo in jpeg? "Best" with respect to what? "Best quality" = least amount of compression "Best size" = most amount of compression. Most people select a medium compression value, and that might be OK for you provided that you do not edit the image very many times. Jim I just want to scan some camera photos that I borrowed. I may not have access to the photos again as they will be sent overseas, so I need a good scan job. Regards Brian |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JPEG compression | James Ramaley | Digital Photography | 14 | October 26th 04 01:41 AM |
Ron Baird - Kodak DX7630 high jpeg compression | Ron Baird | Digital Photography | 9 | August 24th 04 03:19 PM |
Attn: Ron Baird - Kodak DX7630 high jpeg compression | Ron Hunter | Digital Photography | 9 | August 9th 04 12:04 PM |
JPEG compression options -- can anybody explain? | Beowulf | Digital Photography | 3 | August 4th 04 02:17 AM |
A short study on digicam's fixed jpeg compression ratio | Heikki Siltala | Digital Photography | 23 | July 28th 04 08:49 AM |