If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Canon 5D announced !
Scott W wrote,on my timestamp of 26/09/2008 5:36 AM:
I have not seen a photo from the 5D2 that uses a prime lens, but this shot is not too bad even with a zoom lens. http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/ca...s/img_0662.jpg If you down size it to 50% and back up it is clearly softer, unlike your images, and it is also a jpg. Scott, do you understand basic English? Here is a basic phrase even you might be able to understand: your "downsize/upsize" "technique" to determine level of detail is a LOAD OF CRAP! There, is that clear? You simply CANNOT make ANY assumptions about detail by downsizing/upsizing a jpg which you have NO CLUE at what level of detail was saved. Got it, or do you want to continue to embarass yourself with idiotic claims? Do you really think that your images are so soft because they are jpeg? STOP the misinformation, Scott! My images are "soft" because unlike yours they are published at FULL resolution and unsharpened, not the downressed oversharpened crap you claim is "full of detail" just because it appears sharp. NO digital image, regardless of the sensor used, is sharp at full rez. That is a direct consequence of the Bayer interpolation, the alias filter and the de-mosaic routines that must be applied to the original mush. That is also why EVERY digital image MUST be sharpened. Here is a sharp jpeg and what happens to it when you down size to 50% and back up. http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/103012477/original No, Scott: that is NOT a "sharp jpg". That is a FABRICATED image, a modified original, which is all you are capable of producing when asked for proof. What quality was the original created with? What quality was mine created with? Just because an image is in jpeg format does not mean it is any softer then it would if it was in tiff format. Oh yes it does! Get this: jpg uses LOSSY compression. Know what that means? Here is some basic English: LOSSY means it has LOST something. What do you think it has lost, Scott? |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Canon 5D announced !
Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 30/09/2008 1:12 AM:
Well, you'll be happy to know that Laforet says the 5DII produces the best high-ISO shots he's ever seen. He's never used anything but Canon, has he? LOL! Here are some actual samples: http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/control...articleID=2128 That's more like it! How come this Laforet bloke is the only one capable of taking reasonable shots with the 5d2? And what happened with the girl's dress in focus but the face clearly soft? Another "boat" shot? Still a lot of unknowns there, but getting better... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon 5D announced ! | Maurice Blanchard[_4_] | Digital Photography | 151 | September 29th 08 04:54 PM |
Canon 40D Announced | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital Photography | 15 | August 23rd 07 03:48 AM |
Canon 40D Announced | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | August 23rd 07 01:00 AM |
Canon S5 announced | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital ZLR Cameras | 19 | May 11th 07 01:56 AM |
Canon G7 announced | Daniel Silevitch | Digital Photography | 20 | September 18th 06 08:34 PM |