If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GPS and Digital Photography
In article ,
Artoi wrote: In article , Phil Wheeler wrote: Ted Edwards wrote: Jack wrote: The June issue of Digital Photographer has a good article on using a GPS(Garmin 60csx), Canon DSLR, and inexpensive software to make geo-positioning easier. If you download and save your active track and your pictures to your computer before doing anything to them, it is a trivial project to match up the time stamps from the picture files and the GPS track log. In fact it so easy it could even be done with one of those spread sheet thingys. Last trip was 14 days and over 2000 images. Might stress my track memory Just remembered another software that supposed to have Photo-GPS related functionalities, JetPhoto (for Mac OS X). http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/17242 I haven't tried but people can read about it. -- According to the Jetphoto website, it is also for Windows. The price can't be beat. By the way, with the current size of the storage media the simplest solution might be to simply take a picture of your GPS screen every now and then. Harrie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
GPS and Digital Photography
Artoi wrote:
By the way, with the current size of the storage media the simplest solution might be to simply take a picture of your GPS screen every now and then. I think I like this method best! Helluva waste of photo memory though! Especially if you're shooting in RAW mode on a high MP camera! What's wrong with simply pressing the "MARK" button on your GPS? Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
GPS and Digital Photography
In article , Paul Saunders
wrote: Artoi wrote: By the way, with the current size of the storage media the simplest solution might be to simply take a picture of your GPS screen every now and then. I think I like this method best! Helluva waste of photo memory though! Especially if you're shooting in RAW mode on a high MP camera! What's wrong with simply pressing the "MARK" button on your GPS? Because pushing the mark button would require more text entries to correlate with the photo. Trust me, switching out of RAW only takes less than a few button presses on most modern cameras. Even more to the point, I hardly ever shoot RAW. :P -- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
GPS and Digital Photography
Artoi wrote:
Helluva waste of photo memory though! Especially if you're shooting in RAW mode on a high MP camera! What's wrong with simply pressing the "MARK" button on your GPS? Because pushing the mark button would require more text entries to correlate with the photo. Trust me, switching out of RAW only takes less than a few button presses on most modern cameras. You're probably right, but I never go to that menu and I don't want to make the mistake of switching to a low res jpeg then forgetting to switch it back. It's far easier to simply mark a waypoint, but if you prefer to photograph the GPS, that's your choice. Even more to the point, I hardly ever shoot RAW. I never shoot anything else. More to the point, I shoot at so many different locations during a typical walk that photographing the GPS at every one would not only drive me nuts going in and out of the menus to switch to jpeg and back each time, but would consume far too much photo memory in total. I know, I need to buy more memory cards... But again, working out the location from the track takes very little time and I very rarely need to do it. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|