If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
I'd love some advice before buying either the Canon S2 IS or the
Panasonic DMC FZ7. (I know that the Panasonic FZ7 won't be available for a couple of weeks.) I'm looking at those two cameras for their high zoom and macro capabilities. I've read reviews that suggest both camera have problems focusing at high zoom. This matters to me as I am more likely to take a photo of an architectural detail than a photo of a whole building. Also, is the zoom feature continuous? I read a site (now I remember neither the site nor the camera) which praised the continuous transition of the zoom. (It may have been the Kodak P850 which I rejected on the basis of lesser picture quality.) I don't expect to use either the creative settings or the movie mode. I want the best result in auto mode. I have tiny hands so, in a perfect world, the best camera will be the smallest and lightest. Ultimately, the photo quality matters more than weight. I'm currently using an Olympus Stylus 10X which weighs 10 ounces. The Canon weighs 14 ounces and the Panasonic weighs 11 ounces. Recommendations please! Thanks! Karen Selwyn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:25:19 -0500, Karen Selwyn wrote:
I'd love some advice before buying either the Canon S2 IS or the Panasonic DMC FZ7. (I know that the Panasonic FZ7 won't be available for a couple of weeks.) I'm looking at those two cameras for their high zoom and macro capabilities. I've read reviews that suggest both camera have problems focusing at high zoom. This matters to me as I am more likely to take a photo of an architectural detail than a photo of a whole building. Also, is the zoom feature continuous? I read a site (now I remember neither the site nor the camera) which praised the continuous transition of the zoom. (It may have been the Kodak P850 which I rejected on the basis of lesser picture quality.) I don't expect to use either the creative settings or the movie mode. I want the best result in auto mode. I have tiny hands so, in a perfect world, the best camera will be the smallest and lightest. Ultimately, the photo quality matters more than weight. I'm currently using an Olympus Stylus 10X which weighs 10 ounces. The Canon weighs 14 ounces and the Panasonic weighs 11 ounces. I have the FZ5, the camera that the 7 will replace, so I can give you some feedback. In anything approximating good light, I've never had a problem focussing at full zoom. In low light, the autofocus can sometimes hunt somewhat, but generally gets to the right place eventually. The zoom is not truly continuous, but there are something like 20 or 30 steps in it, so it feels pretty close to continuous. If you want a real continous zoom, you'd have to get an FZ30 with its manually-powered zoom. I've never been limited in framing by the zoom step size; the steps are small enough that you can jog the zoom slightly without trouble. Auto mode works pretty well until the light levels get low; then you have to switch to one of the manual modes. For some reason, the longest shutter time in auto is 1/4s. However, I believe that the FZ7 eliminates that particular bit of silliness. Some examples of pictures I took using the FZ5, in a range of situations (zoom, wide angle, low light, etc): http://ri22.uchicago.edu/~dmsilev/hawaii/ To be fair and complete, I should note that people I've talked to with the Canon have also generally been happy with their camera. Both models give good results. -dms |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
Karen Selwyn wrote:
I'd love some advice before buying either the Canon S2 IS or the Panasonic DMC FZ7. (I know that the Panasonic FZ7 won't be available for a couple of weeks.) I'm looking at those two cameras for their high zoom and macro capabilities. I've read reviews that suggest both camera have problems focusing at high zoom. This matters to me as I am more likely to take a photo of an architectural detail than a photo of a whole building. Also, is the zoom feature continuous? I read a site (now I remember neither the site nor the camera) which praised the continuous transition of the zoom. (It may have been the Kodak P850 which I rejected on the basis of lesser picture quality.) I don't expect to use either the creative settings or the movie mode. I want the best result in auto mode. I have tiny hands so, in a perfect world, the best camera will be the smallest and lightest. Ultimately, the photo quality matters more than weight. I'm currently using an Olympus Stylus 10X which weighs 10 ounces. The Canon weighs 14 ounces and the Panasonic weighs 11 ounces. Recommendations please! Thanks! Karen Selwyn as owner of S2, i never experienced any problems focusing in any position, and that includes max zoom mode. I even have extra adapter which also works quite well. Zoom is continous or not, as you set in settings. I guess you alreasy know that you can't have all...small and light camera and big zoom at the same time. S2 is bigger and heavier, but it's quite excellent camera. But, i guess to be sure it's best that you hold them both in your hands, if you will have option maybe do some test shooting and then decide. some test shots i have on my web page for viewing: http://www.protoncek.com -- Visit my web page at http://www.protoncek.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
Karen Selwyn wrote:
I'd love some advice before buying either the Canon S2 IS or the Panasonic DMC FZ7. (I know that the Panasonic FZ7 won't be available for a couple of weeks.) I'm looking at those two cameras for their high zoom and macro capabilities. I've read reviews that suggest both camera have problems focusing at high zoom. This matters to me as I am more likely to take a photo of an architectural detail than a photo of a whole building. Also, is the zoom feature continuous? I read a site (now I remember neither the site nor the camera) which praised the continuous transition of the zoom. (It may have been the Kodak P850 which I rejected on the basis of lesser picture quality.) I don't expect to use either the creative settings or the movie mode. I want the best result in auto mode. I have tiny hands so, in a perfect world, the best camera will be the smallest and lightest. Ultimately, the photo quality matters more than weight. I'm currently using an Olympus Stylus 10X which weighs 10 ounces. The Canon weighs 14 ounces and the Panasonic weighs 11 ounces. Recommendations please! Thanks! I think I'd go with the Panasonic. The FZ7 will probably have the same noise issues as the FZ5, but the S2 is noisy too. At least with the FZ7 you get the the Li-Ion battery. For $350 it's a pretty good deal, the Canon is about $75 more. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
SMS wrote:
Karen Selwyn wrote: I'd love some advice before buying either the Canon S2 IS or the Panasonic DMC FZ7. (I know that the Panasonic FZ7 won't be available for a couple of weeks.) I'm looking at those two cameras for their high zoom and macro capabilities. I've read reviews that suggest both camera have problems focusing at high zoom. This matters to me as I am more likely to take a photo of an architectural detail than a photo of a whole building. Also, is the zoom feature continuous? I read a site (now I remember neither the site nor the camera) which praised the continuous transition of the zoom. (It may have been the Kodak P850 which I rejected on the basis of lesser picture quality.) I don't expect to use either the creative settings or the movie mode. I want the best result in auto mode. I have tiny hands so, in a perfect world, the best camera will be the smallest and lightest. Ultimately, the photo quality matters more than weight. I'm currently using an Olympus Stylus 10X which weighs 10 ounces. The Canon weighs 14 ounces and the Panasonic weighs 11 ounces. Recommendations please! Thanks! I think I'd go with the Panasonic. The FZ7 will probably have the same noise issues as the FZ5, but the S2 is noisy too. At least with the FZ7 you get the the Li-Ion battery. For $350 it's a pretty good deal, the Canon is about $75 more. not good idea...to start with battery again...not long ago a biiiig thread resulted on this topic...meaning which one is better... like i said...it's best to wait, hold it, take or at least see some shots and first reviews and decide. It maybe a good deal, it may be a bad either. It happened before that a good product was corrupted in next model... -- Visit my web page at http://www.protoncek.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
SleeperMan wrote:
I think I'd go with the Panasonic. The FZ7 will probably have the same noise issues as the FZ5, but the S2 is noisy too. At least with the FZ7 you get the the Li-Ion battery. For $350 it's a pretty good deal, the Canon is about $75 more. not good idea...to start with battery again...not long ago a biiiig thread resulted on this topic...meaning which one is better... like i said...it's best to wait, hold it, take or at least see some shots and first reviews and decide. It maybe a good deal, it may be a bad either. It happened before that a good product was corrupted in next model... I'm a complete novice; this will be my first digital camera. As a result, I'm confused by your comment and, generally, overwhelmed by the whole array of choices and issues! You appear to be saying only one of the models uses batteries. Are you drawing a distinction between renewable batteries and ordinary batteries? If so, which camera takes which type? What do you recommend (or was the thread name obvious so I can go to Google Groups)? IIRC, the Canon runs on AA batteries so it has the option of operating on widely-availble, conventional batteries if something goes wrong with the charger or the re-chargeable batteries. I don't remember what the Panasonic uses. Thanks. Karen Selwyn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:08:46 -0500, Karen Selwyn wrote:
I'm a complete novice; this will be my first digital camera. As a result, I'm confused by your comment and, generally, overwhelmed by the whole array of choices and issues! You appear to be saying only one of the models uses batteries. Are you drawing a distinction between renewable batteries and ordinary batteries? If so, which camera takes which type? What do you recommend (or was the thread name obvious so I can go to Google Groups)? IIRC, the Canon runs on AA batteries so it has the option of operating on widely-availble, conventional batteries if something goes wrong with the charger or the re-chargeable batteries. I don't remember what the Panasonic uses. Several years ago digital cameras used so much power that for many of them the use of alkaline AA batteries was prohibitively expensive. Batteries had to be replaced far too often Even if NiMH AA batteries were used, battery life wasn't very good, sometimes being as low as a couple of dozen shots per charge. At that point, cameras that used rechargeable lithium batteries were good choices because they provided decent (if not great) battery life. They also have a better "self-discharge" property than NiMH batteries that can sometimes be an advantage, but not always. If you're not familiar with that term it just means that even if the batteries are not installed in a camera, they'll slowly lose their charge, so if NiMH batteries are needed and it's been a month or two since they were last charged, they'll have lost a good amount of their full charge. Lithium batteries can go several months longer before needing to be recharged. In this respect, alkaline batteries have a *excellent* self-discharge rate, since they'll retain most of their charge many years after they were purchased. Many cameras designed within the last couple of years have solved the battery problem *completely*, primarily due to being designed to use much less battery power. As an example, Canon's A610 and A620 can easily take more a couple of thousand shots using AA batteries. If the flash (which uses a great deal of battery power) is used for many of the shots, these cameras can still take 1200 shots using alkalines or 1500 shots per charge using NiMH batteries if the viewfinder is used instead of the LCD display. These cameras use 4AA cells and I don't know how many the Canon S2 IS uses. If it's only two, then you could assume it would take slightly less than 1/2 the number of shots per battery set/charge. Even if it's only good for 300 or 400 shots, that's still not too shabby. It would be enough for me to go at least several days before the batteries would need to be replaced or recharged. Even if you prefer AA batteries (you're right - they're cheap and easily bought 24 hours/day, almost everywhere), if you really like the Panasonic cameras (which I assume use rechargeable lithium batteries) don't let that stand in the way of getting one. They're good cameras too, but I'd have one qualm. When I saw them in a display case they looked very boxy and uncomfortable to hold. Obviously many people think they're just fine, but if I was faced with the choices you are, I'd want to try one is a camera shop first to see if the camera "feel" is better than appearances indicate. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
ASAAR.... What a nice, straight-forward explanation of battery
OC's (operating characteristics :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:49:33 -0500, ASAAR wrote:
Even if you prefer AA batteries (you're right - they're cheap and easily bought 24 hours/day, almost everywhere), if you really like the Panasonic cameras (which I assume use rechargeable lithium batteries) don't let that stand in the way of getting one. They're good cameras too, but I'd have one qualm. When I saw them in a display case they looked very boxy and uncomfortable to hold. Obviously many people think they're just fine, but if I was faced with the choices you are, I'd want to try one is a camera shop first to see if the camera "feel" is better than appearances indicate. I would say that if your hand is big enough to curl around the grip without stretching, the camera will be comfortable to hold. That's the sort of thing, of course, that needs to be experienced first hand. She said she has small hands, so that's something that needs to be checked. The FZ5 is somewhat blocky, but it's small (compared to e.g. the S2IS) which makes it less of an issue. From the previews I've seen, the FZ7 is considerably less blocky than the 5. It's hard to tell from the preview pictures, but the grip seems to be about the same size. And yes, the FZ series uses lithium batteries. -dms |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Canon S2 IS versus Panasonic DMC FZ7
Karen Selwyn wrote:
I'm a complete novice; this will be my first digital camera. As a result, I'm confused by your comment and, generally, overwhelmed by the The noise issue is significant with these small sensor, high megapixel, CCD cameras because the pixel size is so small. You have to accept that you really can't use anything higher than ISO 200, and often even the ISO 200 is noisy. Panasonic seems to constantly get panned for noise issues, but it may be simply because their cameras are so compelling in other ways and the noise spoils what would otherwise be an outstanding product line-up. IIRC, the Canon runs on AA batteries so it has the option of operating on widely-availble, conventional batteries if something goes wrong with the charger or the re-chargeable batteries. I don't remember what the Panasonic uses. Yes the advantage of AA batteries is the ability to use conventional batteries in a pinch. However there are significant advantages to Li-Ion as well. You can read about the trade-offs between the two types of batteries at "http://batterydata.com". It's a site I put together to bring together all the issues in the battery debate in a clear and unbiased manner. As someone else pointed out, it may be unwise to rush out and buy a FZ7, prior to some independent reviews. It is quite possible that the FZ7 will be worse than the FZ5, because the increased resolution will mean more noise. You might be better off with the FZ5. If the noise is the same on both, go with the Panasonic for the lower price and the Li-Ion battery. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon SW versus iPhoto | fishfry | Digital Photography | 6 | February 8th 06 05:16 AM |
Ping MarkČ. Canon 24-70 f2.8 'Versus' Canon 24-105 f4 IS | Paul | Digital Photography | 1 | December 16th 05 05:33 AM |
Canon 350D versus Nikon D50 | Dave Addison | Digital Photography | 4 | November 19th 05 11:19 AM |
Canon S1 IS vs Panasonic FZ20 | measekite | Digital Photography | 31 | March 21st 05 05:21 PM |
Canon S1 IS versus Panasonic FZ20?? | spodosaurus | Digital Photography | 28 | December 10th 04 05:47 AM |