A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aperture's Future



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old August 15th 16, 04:46 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Aperture's Future

In article , PAS wrote:



Eliminating the headphone jack in favor of a wireless connection leaves
those of us with a good set of wired headphones out in the cold. I'm
perfectly happy with the headphones and earbuds that I use and have no
inkling to buy new ones. I would hesitate to buy a phone without a
jack. If all phone makers eventually eliminate the jack then there is no
choice left for me. In the meantime, I want a jack on my phone.


it doesn't leave anyone out in the cold.

all that's needed is an adapter (which may even be included) and you
can keep using any headphones you want.
  #52  
Old August 15th 16, 05:20 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PAS[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 595
Default Aperture's Future

On 8/15/2016 11:03 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 8/13/2016 9:25 PM, Bill W wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:53:41 -0400, "Mayayana"
wrote:

I'm still running Paint Shop Pro 5, which I'm sure
will run on Win10, despite being some 15 years
older. That's because the Windows API is
additive: System functions are added but not
broken. As long as a function was officially
documented as part of the API, it can be depended
upon to work. In 1995 or 2016.


This is absolutely not true. I am always very surprised when my older
software works from one version of Windows to the next. Cool Edit 2000
might be my only software that has continued to work through the
years, and it is certainly the only audio/music software that has.


But MS did break Outlook, so running older versions on Win 10, and
often on Win7, is a futz job.

I think that might be the case for the Office suite, not just Outlook.

  #53  
Old August 15th 16, 05:46 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default Aperture's Future

On 15/08/2016 13:06, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-08-15 11:24:13 +0000, David Taylor

[]
Not weather satellite related, but simply programs which are not
available for iOS.


Such as?


Any which show the signal strength from GPS satellites, for example.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
  #54  
Old August 15th 16, 05:50 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Aperture's Future

In article , David Taylor
wrote:

Not weather satellite related, but simply programs which are not
available for iOS.


Such as?


Any which show the signal strength from GPS satellites, for example.


the part you don't mention is you are using an external gps to do that,
which works just fine on ios.
  #55  
Old August 15th 16, 05:55 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default Aperture's Future

On 15/08/2016 14:11, android wrote:
[]
I think that the Xperia M4 gives quite god results, within the the
envelope of the small cellphone sensors. Sony has unfortunately decided
to dump that affordable and rain safe line of mobiles.

Do your Moto G3 do DNG? If so you can use the free mobile Lightroom to
edit those files on the go!

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/67...obe-lightroom-
android-2-0

DxO has a rolling ranking of phone sensors at the right side of this page:


I think DNG is unlikely, but I don't need it in any case. Any
in-the-field editing is usually limited to cropping before posting to
Twitter, and any more complex editing is done back at base. I don't do
RAW. Please don't get me wrong - I'm not saying a good phone camera is
a replacement for a DSLR-style camera, simply that I've been surprised
both how good the results are and how versatile it is.

A WiFi tethered UMPC is probably the best way to go for more advanced
mobile computing. You can use most smartphones phone as hotspots.


Yes, I would likely use a $200 10-inch Windows-10 tablet if I needed
that. I already use the Moto G3 as a hotspot. I have one of these and
find it remarkably capable, especially for the price!


http://www.ebuyer.com/721602-linx-10...q3Gwodglk KpA

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
  #56  
Old August 15th 16, 05:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default Aperture's Future

On 15/08/2016 17:20, PAS wrote:
On 8/15/2016 11:03 AM, PeterN wrote:

[]
But MS did break Outlook, so running older versions on Win 10, and
often on Win7, is a futz job.

I think that might be the case for the Office suite, not just Outlook.


I never used Outlook, but even Office 2000 runs on Windows-10.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
  #57  
Old August 15th 16, 06:05 PM posted to comp.sys.mac.system,rec.photo.digital
Jolly Roger[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default Aperture's Future

JF Mezei wrote:
On 2016-08-15 01:13, Jolly Roger wrote:

then you can either upgrade the OS or continue using the older client apps.


The older client apps are disabled from launching on post Snow Leopard
client desktops.


Then you should either keep your client desktops running 10.6, or upgrade
the server to the latest. It seems you're just trolling at this point.

Anyhow none of this has any relevance to the OPs issue with Aperture which
runs fine in the latest OS versions.


I had brought this up at a time where he said he was not able to launch
the app.


You made a wild ass guess and spewed misinformation from a position of pure
ignorance as usual.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
  #58  
Old August 15th 16, 06:07 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Aperture's Future

On 2016-08-15 16:46:46 +0000, David Taylor
said:

On 15/08/2016 13:06, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-08-15 11:24:13 +0000, David Taylor

[]
Not weather satellite related, but simply programs which are not
available for iOS.


Such as?


Any which show the signal strength from GPS satellites, for example.


....er, have you looked?
http://www.lodestonewireless.com/gps-diagnostic.html
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/gps-diagnostic-test-measurement/id1020967894?mt=8

--


Regards,

Savageduck

  #59  
Old August 15th 16, 06:47 PM posted to comp.sys.mac.system,rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Aperture's Future

In article om, JF
Mezei wrote:

So at the time the OP stated it would not launch, it was not "trolling"
to suggest that OS-X had been coded to not launch that app version.


once again, all he needs to do is update to the current version and the
problems go away.

it will probably take a phone call because he waited so long but it's
still possible.
  #60  
Old August 15th 16, 08:12 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default Aperture's Future

On 15/08/2016 18:07, Savageduck wrote:
[]
...er, have you looked?
http://www.lodestonewireless.com/gps-diagnostic.html
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/gps-diagnostic-test-measurement/id1020967894?mt=8


Yes, I have looked. The "quality" values displayed by that program are
completely meaningless (we expect SNR in dB), the satellite PRNs aren't
listed, nor are the satellite locations.

One of the experts on the iPad newsgroup said that Apple did not expose
the necessary information for a meaningful display, so it was impossible
to write a proper GPS monitoring program for iOS.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this the future? J. Clarke Digital Photography 9 November 14th 08 05:03 PM
In-camera aperture vs. In-lens apertu What's the difference? LooksLikeRain Digital SLR Cameras 22 May 10th 07 05:52 AM
Aperture future in question as Apple axes bulk of team l e o Digital Photography 41 May 10th 06 06:03 AM
The GUI of the future. cjcampbell Digital Photography 2 March 27th 06 10:35 PM
The future of APS Offshoreman APS Photographic Equipment 20 December 18th 03 03:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.