A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

THE CURE FOR RITA!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 19th 08, 05:49 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,aus.photo
Mr.T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 889
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!


"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
Do you find yourself constantly irritated by the Rita troll?
Well good news, geeks, help is on the way!
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100364975/original


Or simply use a kill-file.

MrT.


  #2  
Old July 20th 08, 04:45 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,aus.photo
Mr.T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 889
Default THE CURE FOR ANNIKA?


"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
...
Do you find yourself constantly irritated by the Rita troll?
Well good news, geeks, help is on the way!
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100364975/original


Or simply use a kill-file.


So far, one comment about the photo itself and two comments about
trolls and killfiles. It is very obvious who the photographers are in
this group and who is just here to play Usenet games.


Well the photo was pretty unremarkable, and the gag not as good as the many
decades old "Bull Repellant... stops bulls hitting".
(Could probably do with some for Annika's posts.... "or simply use a kill
file" :-)

MrT.



  #3  
Old July 20th 08, 10:48 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,aus.photo
Jufí
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!


"Annika1980" wrote in message
...

So far, one comment about the photo itself and two comments about
trolls and killfiles. It is very obvious who the photographers are in
this group and who is just here to play Usenet games.


You really wanted comments on a lame gag photo? Really?

Unworthy of you, I must say.

  #4  
Old July 21st 08, 12:30 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!

Annika1980 wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:48 pm, Jufí wrote:
You really wanted comments on a lame gag photo? Really?
Unworthy of you, I must say.


FYI, I worked very hard on that "lame gag photo."


And I did ask how you did it, including a compliment for a solid job, or
summat like dat.

--
john mcwilliams
  #5  
Old July 21st 08, 03:10 AM posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!

Rita Berkowitz wrote:
Annika1980 wrote:

So far, one comment about the photo itself and two comments about
trolls and killfiles. It is very obvious who the photographers are in
this group and who is just here to play Usenet games.


You posted a photo? And you have to ask why SI was a complete and total
failure?



I can see how proud you are, "Rita", for your part in the demise of the
SI. Way to go; you are indeed the Champ.

--
lsmft
  #6  
Old July 21st 08, 03:44 AM posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Mark Thomas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 835
Default OT Rita - Digital Soft Paw on Flickr THE CURE FOR RITA!

John McWilliams wrote:
Rita Berkowitz wrote:
You posted a photo? And you have to ask why SI was a complete and
total failure?


I can see how proud you are, "Rita", for your part in the demise of the
SI. Way to go; you are indeed the Champ.


It's illuminating that Rita focuses on denigrating the forum s/he posts
to and attacking anything/anyone that might provide criticism of her images.

S/he would naturally take particular delight in the SI's (temporary -
I'll bet it comes back) demise. It is a forum where for the most part,
images are supplied and critiqued on merit rather than personality. You
could sense the seething jealousy when people she disliked got high
praise for their work. It is also notable that s/he is incapable of
actually critiquing - rather like her inability to *take* a critique!
And of course she would never actually post an image to such a forum -
one on which she cannot control the responses she gets, or simply use
the "I meant to post a bad one" excuse...

It's also interesting to note that initially she posted images without
claiming they were food for 'idiots'.. But then sometime after she
started to get heavily criticised, the "I'm doing this to tease you"
excuse came out.

It's a shame. But some people like to destroy rather than improve, and
are incapable of taking criticism.

(O:
  #7  
Old July 21st 08, 04:18 AM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
SneakyP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!

"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in
m:

Annika1980 wrote:

So far, one comment about the photo itself and two comments about
trolls and killfiles. It is very obvious who the photographers are in
this group and who is just here to play Usenet games.


You posted a photo? And you have to ask why SI was a complete and total
failure?

No, you complete ninny. Quit spamming the photos from your ever so
MAAAVelous Camera. Your only goal is to gloat about a machine, not learn
or make astute conversations on photography in general.
proof - you already have these specimens on flickr....

sheesh.






--
SneakyP
To reply: newsgroup only, what's posted in ng stays in ng.

Some choose to swim in the potty bowl of nan-ae rather than flush it
down :0)
  #8  
Old July 21st 08, 05:28 AM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Mark Thomas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 835
Default OT Rita - Digital Soft Paw on Flickr THE CURE FOR RITA!

Rita Berkowitz wrote:
Funny thing is you're so
****ed because you can't get a rise from me


This post. Flickr. That's 2-0 'rises', loser.

Given that I now ignore 98% of your crap, wtf would i care about what
you have posted on pbase? And why do you need to hide your identity -
subconciously ashamed of your behavior?


BTW, it is refreshing to see that even Tony C has dropped you now, so
that leaves ... hmm ... a supporter base of what, exactly?

Guess there's always D-Mac? (or 2squid, as he is today..)
  #9  
Old July 21st 08, 05:43 AM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
2SQUID
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!

SneakyP wrote:
"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in
m:

Annika1980 wrote:

So far, one comment about the photo itself and two comments about
trolls and killfiles. It is very obvious who the photographers are in
this group and who is just here to play Usenet games.

You posted a photo? And you have to ask why SI was a complete and total
failure?

No, you complete ninny. Quit spamming the photos from your ever so
MAAAVelous Camera. Your only goal is to gloat about a machine, not learn
or make astute conversations on photography in general.
proof - you already have these specimens on flickr....

sheesh.






And the difference between Annika1980 and Rita is what?
Rita can afford her hobby and Annika1980 relies on the generosity of a
woman his wife must surely not know about.

Both these people make remarkably similar posts but Rita never slips up
and posts a message as Helen without switching feeds. What does that
tell you about them?

Me and big Squid
  #10  
Old July 21st 08, 05:46 AM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Atheist Chaplain[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 926
Default THE CURE FOR RITA!

"2SQUID" wrote in message
...
SneakyP wrote:
"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in
m:

Annika1980 wrote:

So far, one comment about the photo itself and two comments about
trolls and killfiles. It is very obvious who the photographers are in
this group and who is just here to play Usenet games.
You posted a photo? And you have to ask why SI was a complete and total
failure?

No, you complete ninny. Quit spamming the photos from your ever so
MAAAVelous Camera. Your only goal is to gloat about a machine, not learn
or make astute conversations on photography in general. proof - you
already have these specimens on flickr....

sheesh.






And the difference between Annika1980 and Rita is what?
Rita can afford her hobby and Annika1980 relies on the generosity of a
woman his wife must surely not know about.

Both these people make remarkably similar posts but Rita never slips up
and posts a message as Helen without switching feeds. What does that tell
you about them?

Me and big Squid


Probably tells us that you know all about slipping up when posting from one
of your socks Douggie, maybe you could give Brett some advice about that so
he can do the exact opposite because lets face it, your not very good at
this sockpuppetry thing, regardless of your years of experience :-)

--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THE CURE FOR RITA! 2SQUID 35mm Photo Equipment 1 July 21st 08 04:13 AM
Cure from vitiligo vitiligo Digital Photography 0 April 28th 07 11:43 AM
Permanent Acne Cure tim Digital Photography 11 May 1st 06 12:14 PM
HP 935 5.1mp digital camera. Error message: "SD card is locked".Need a cure to take pictures again. onederer Digital Point & Shoot Cameras 15 June 17th 05 08:43 AM
A cure Vitiligo 100% Pure Herbal Treatment For White Patches ,vitiligo VitiligoHerb Fine Art, Framing and Display 0 April 17th 05 09:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.