If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
In message , GMAN
writes In article , "mmyvusenet" wrote: Hello: I took these photos in the interesting Historical Center of Lima: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590179791/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ Thanks for your technical comments about photography. Is there not any other subject to shoot in your country other than the catholic church? I agree... I think most of us do except Tony who is an apologist for the Catholic church. However I think the real problem is not that they are all snaps of Catholic Churches it is just they at they are not very good or inspiring. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
"John Turco" wrote in message
... tony cooper wrote: Would you say that the macro photographer is so brainwashed by his interest in entomology that he can see no other subject to photograph? Why is it that a person who does macro insect photography does so because the subject interests them, but a person who photographs churches is "brainwashed"? edited Well, by now, you ("tony cooper") must've noticed that this newsgroup news:rec.photo.digital is simply full of intolerant posters. These arrogant authors seem to think that bashing organized religions makes them appear open-minded. I agree with your conment about intolerant trolls. However, IMHO the underlying issue is that Miguel continually takes the same type of shots and seems to ignore the advice and comments given by others. I think his shots are boring and repetitive. Therefore, it can be well understood why some may call him brainashed. Furthermore, they continually confuse such "belief systems" with the true question of God's existence. The question of teh existence of a supreme being is still a belief. What many really object to, is the use of beleif in a supreme being as a means to line pockets and control others. The main offender is "Chis H" of Great Britain, whose rants against the Catholic Church and the USA are mean and many. He also appears to be vindictive...as within this very thread, he delivered yet another of his anti-Catholic remarks, which was coupled with a personal jab at you. He is not worth responding to. -- Peter |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
"John Turco" wrote in message
... Peter wrote: "John Turco" wrote in message ... tony cooper wrote: Would you say that the macro photographer is so brainwashed by his interest in entomology that he can see no other subject to photograph? Why is it that a person who does macro insect photography does so because the subject interests them, but a person who photographs churches is "brainwashed"? edited Well, by now, you ("tony cooper") must've noticed that this newsgroup news:rec.photo.digital is simply full of intolerant posters. These arrogant authors seem to think that bashing organized religions makes them appear open-minded. I agree with your conment about intolerant trolls. However, IMHO the underlying issue is that Miguel continually takes the same type of shots and seems to ignore the advice and comments given by others. I think his shots are boring and repetitive. Therefore, it can be well understood why some may call him brainashed. Maybe, Miguel is gunning for more "hits" on his Web page? Whatever his real intentions are, he's humble and polite; hence, he doesn't deserve to be insulted. I try very hard not to insult people. I refuse to lecture to others on that issue. My main interest here is photography. Yes I will occassionally divert. For me photography is a hobby. I freely share what information I have and only ask that it be considered, then rejected, followed, or modified. When I see well intentined advice given by others similarly ignored, I will stop. I refuse to bang my head against the wall. Furthermore, they continually confuse such "belief systems" with the true question of God's existence. The question of teh existence of a supreme being is still a belief. Scientific theories are often merely "beliefs," also. Absolutely true and they shold not be advanced as fact, either. What many really object to, is the use of beleif in a supreme being as a means to line pockets and control others. The same can be said of "faith" in the unquestioned authority of modern science and technology. So, how does that affect my comment? The main offender is "Chis H" of Great Britain, whose rants against the Catholic Church and the USA are mean and many. He also appears to be vindictive...as within this very thread, he delivered yet another of his anti-Catholic remarks, which was coupled with a personal jab at you. He is not worth responding to. Most anybody is "worth responding to" -- the use of "kill files" is simply a way of hiding one's head in the sand, as it were. I am not a charitable as you. You certainly are free to feel differently, but I don't respond to every post here. Unlike some sad people here, I do have a very real life. I ration my time as I see fit. Nobody here has the right to tell me how to spend my time. (Assuming my wife does not participate in this group.) -- Peter |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
On 6/30/10 1:44 PM, in article , "Peter" wrote: "George Kerby" wrote in message ... On 6/29/10 10:10 PM, in article , "John Turco" wrote: Peter wrote: "John Turco" wrote in message ... tony cooper wrote: Would you say that the macro photographer is so brainwashed by his interest in entomology that he can see no other subject to photograph? Why is it that a person who does macro insect photography does so because the subject interests them, but a person who photographs churches is "brainwashed"? edited Well, by now, you ("tony cooper") must've noticed that this newsgroup news:rec.photo.digital is simply full of intolerant posters. These arrogant authors seem to think that bashing organized religions makes them appear open-minded. I agree with your conment about intolerant trolls. However, IMHO the underlying issue is that Miguel continually takes the same type of shots and seems to ignore the advice and comments given by others. I think his shots are boring and repetitive. Therefore, it can be well understood why some may call him brainashed. Maybe, Miguel is gunning for more "hits" on his Web page? Whatever his real intentions are, he's humble and polite; hence, he doesn't deserve to be insulted. Furthermore, they continually confuse such "belief systems" with the true question of God's existence. The question of teh existence of a supreme being is still a belief. Scientific theories are often merely "beliefs," also. What many really object to, is the use of beleif in a supreme being as a means to line pockets and control others. The same can be said of "faith" in the unquestioned authority of modern science and technology. Not to mention the inventor of internet's "Global Warming" followers. Truth is, Al's 'warming' was only in his pants while in a hotel in Portland. Sad thing is you deny the results of scientific studies and research. Sad thing is that you deny results of scientific studies and research yourself, my man. If it affected only you, I really wouldn't care. Screw you, too. Try looking at the research of responsible oceanographers, it might open your eyes. I have. Most of the GobleyGook is from Scripps-related folks who are looking for GuvMint $$$. A simple Google search produces many counter to this lemming collection... http://american_almanac.tripod.com/globwarm.htm Unless you say if Al Gore agreed with it, it must be false. Al Gore is a false. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:14:08 -0400, "Peter"
wrote: I am not a charitable as you. You certainly are free to feel differently, but I don't respond to every post here. Unlike some sad people here, I do have a very real life. I ration my time as I see fit. Nobody here has the right to tell me how to spend my time. (Assuming my wife does not participate in this group.) Well said. I don't have time for the twits and the trolls, and a kill file makes Usenet a much more pleasant experience. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
"George Kerby" wrote in message
... On 6/30/10 1:44 PM, in article , "Peter" wrote: "George Kerby" wrote in message ... On 6/29/10 10:10 PM, in article , "John Turco" wrote: Peter wrote: "John Turco" wrote in message ... tony cooper wrote: Would you say that the macro photographer is so brainwashed by his interest in entomology that he can see no other subject to photograph? Why is it that a person who does macro insect photography does so because the subject interests them, but a person who photographs churches is "brainwashed"? edited Well, by now, you ("tony cooper") must've noticed that this newsgroup news:rec.photo.digital is simply full of intolerant posters. These arrogant authors seem to think that bashing organized religions makes them appear open-minded. I agree with your conment about intolerant trolls. However, IMHO the underlying issue is that Miguel continually takes the same type of shots and seems to ignore the advice and comments given by others. I think his shots are boring and repetitive. Therefore, it can be well understood why some may call him brainashed. Maybe, Miguel is gunning for more "hits" on his Web page? Whatever his real intentions are, he's humble and polite; hence, he doesn't deserve to be insulted. Furthermore, they continually confuse such "belief systems" with the true question of God's existence. The question of teh existence of a supreme being is still a belief. Scientific theories are often merely "beliefs," also. What many really object to, is the use of beleif in a supreme being as a means to line pockets and control others. The same can be said of "faith" in the unquestioned authority of modern science and technology. Not to mention the inventor of internet's "Global Warming" followers. Truth is, Al's 'warming' was only in his pants while in a hotel in Portland. Sad thing is you deny the results of scientific studies and research. Sad thing is that you deny results of scientific studies and research yourself, my man. If it affected only you, I really wouldn't care. Screw you, too. Try looking at the research of responsible oceanographers, it might open your eyes. I have. Most of the GobleyGook is from Scripps-related folks who are looking for GuvMint $$$. A simple Google search produces many counter to this lemming collection... http://american_almanac.tripod.com/globwarm.htm Unless you say if Al Gore agreed with it, it must be false. Al Gore is a false. bye -- Peter |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
On 7/1/10 7:42 AM, in article , "Peter" wrote: "George Kerby" wrote in message ... On 6/30/10 1:44 PM, in article , "Peter" wrote: "George Kerby" wrote in message ... On 6/29/10 10:10 PM, in article , "John Turco" wrote: Peter wrote: "John Turco" wrote in message ... tony cooper wrote: Would you say that the macro photographer is so brainwashed by his interest in entomology that he can see no other subject to photograph? Why is it that a person who does macro insect photography does so because the subject interests them, but a person who photographs churches is "brainwashed"? edited Well, by now, you ("tony cooper") must've noticed that this newsgroup news:rec.photo.digital is simply full of intolerant posters. These arrogant authors seem to think that bashing organized religions makes them appear open-minded. I agree with your conment about intolerant trolls. However, IMHO the underlying issue is that Miguel continually takes the same type of shots and seems to ignore the advice and comments given by others. I think his shots are boring and repetitive. Therefore, it can be well understood why some may call him brainashed. Maybe, Miguel is gunning for more "hits" on his Web page? Whatever his real intentions are, he's humble and polite; hence, he doesn't deserve to be insulted. Furthermore, they continually confuse such "belief systems" with the true question of God's existence. The question of teh existence of a supreme being is still a belief. Scientific theories are often merely "beliefs," also. What many really object to, is the use of beleif in a supreme being as a means to line pockets and control others. The same can be said of "faith" in the unquestioned authority of modern science and technology. Not to mention the inventor of internet's "Global Warming" followers. Truth is, Al's 'warming' was only in his pants while in a hotel in Portland. Sad thing is you deny the results of scientific studies and research. Sad thing is that you deny results of scientific studies and research yourself, my man. If it affected only you, I really wouldn't care. Screw you, too. Try looking at the research of responsible oceanographers, it might open your eyes. I have. Most of the GobleyGook is from Scripps-related folks who are looking for GuvMint $$$. A simple Google search produces many counter to this lemming collection... http://american_almanac.tripod.com/globwarm.htm Unless you say if Al Gore agreed with it, it must be false. Al Gore is a false. bye Bu-bye, boobie... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Photo of Monastery
"John Turco" wrote in message
... Peter wrote: Kodak-bashers sometimes post utter nonsense, which I feel must be refuted; otherwise, I tend to stay out of controversies. (Fill in the blank - bashers usually end up posting complete nonsense) On a long ago visit to Kodak, in Rochester, they had signs saying "photography prohibited." It always looked strange to me, although the reason is understandable. One should remain open-minded, to all types of hypotheses -- even those regarding a "supreme being." This idea has nothing to do with religion, just as "flying saucers" are unrelated to the issue of extraterrestrial intelligence. Popular misconceptions abound! The Flat Earth Society members don't think that their organiation is founded on a misconception. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EPSON Stylus Photo R1800 InkJet Photo Color Printer? _ Opionions? | Ignoramus19259 | Digital Photography | 19 | August 28th 07 01:17 AM |
The Last Monastery Which Virgin Mary Lived in Before Coming To | ATATÜRKÇÜ ÇİZGİDE YAŞAMAK | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | March 17th 07 10:22 AM |
Snapfish - Digital Photo Printing and Free Online Photo Sharing | Starlord | Film & Labs | 1 | November 13th 06 05:12 PM |
Magic photo, blend photo onto another picture, add frame, cartoon and flowers | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 2 | August 22nd 06 08:40 PM |
Epson color controls, photo enhance, ICM - which one for accurate photo printing? | Lindyhop | Digital Photography | 5 | July 3rd 04 03:06 PM |