rec.photo.equipment.slr-systems - NG charter reminder

"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Alfred Molon wrote:
Why are you posting this to rec.photo.digital?

Because x-posts can originate with people reading only those groups -
and this is what the P&S troll is counting on in his x-post list.

So you take down everyone else just to nuke one troll?

I'm not going to debate this with you.

I do suggest that the following might be enlightening.

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

Oooh, look at Mister 'Oighty Toighty. I don't need any lessons on how USENET
operates but you certainly to need to ask yourself if you're not being a bit
of a ****ing prick about this. And you've silently (and politically
expediently) trimmed the headers again you stupid ****.

--
Charles E Hardwidge

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:49:33 -0400, Alan "Mr. Ego" Browne wrote:

I'm only subscribed to alt.photography, don't want to subscribe to a lot
of newsgroups, and would miss the often informative comment which
relates
to any camera regardless of type. Perhaps, people could just practice
good social hygiene and ignore the troll.

The hierarchy and charters are in place for a reason.

Such does not preclude discussing DSLR's on rpd or alt.p, but it does
preclude discussing P&S on the rpd.slr-systems NG.

Perhaps, but it looks a bit elitist.

There are over 100,000 newsgroups. Perhaps all should all be x-posted
together to avoid any suggestion of elitism.

If that buries your posts in the noise it may be a good thing!

"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message

Please remove the rec.photo.digital.slr-systems NG from the newsgroup
x-posts where P&S cameras are concerned.

Just trying to increase the signal/noise.

I'm only subscribed to alt.photography, don't want to subscribe to a
lot of newsgroups, and would miss the often informative comment which
relates to any camera regardless of type. Perhaps, people could just
practice good social hygiene and ignore the troll.

The hierarchy and charters are in place for a reason.

Such does not preclude discussing DSLR's on rpd or alt.p, but it does
preclude discussing P&S on the rpd.slr-systems NG.

Perhaps, but it looks a bit elitist.

There are over 100,000 newsgroups. Perhaps all should all be x-posted
together to avoid any suggestion of elitism.

Now look who's acting like a troll. You might want to think about that
because, I assure you, I can play that game in my sleep. If you want to get
into Zen theology I can wipe the floor both ways with you. So, chill it.

--
Charles E Hardwidge

Charles E Hardwidge wrote:

"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Alfred Molon wrote:
Why are you posting this to rec.photo.digital?

Because x-posts can originate with people reading only those groups -
and this is what the P&S troll is counting on in his x-post list.

So you take down everyone else just to nuke one troll?

I'm not going to debate this with you.

I do suggest that the following might be enlightening.

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

Oooh, look at Mister 'Oighty Toighty. I don't need any lessons on how
USENET
operates but you certainly to need to ask yourself if you're not being a
bit
of a ****ing prick about this. And you've silently (and politically
expediently) trimmed the headers again you stupid ****.

Oh dear, toilet mouth is insulting me. What shall I *do*?

One more time. There are hierarchies for a reason.

There are charters for a reason.

Even you should be able to figure out that rec.photo.digital is a more
general discussion area than, for example, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems

Charles E Hardwidge wrote:

"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message

Please remove the rec.photo.digital.slr-systems NG from the newsgroup
x-posts where P&S cameras are concerned.

Just trying to increase the signal/noise.

I'm only subscribed to alt.photography, don't want to subscribe to a
lot of newsgroups, and would miss the often informative comment which
relates to any camera regardless of type. Perhaps, people could just
practice good social hygiene and ignore the troll.

The hierarchy and charters are in place for a reason.

Such does not preclude discussing DSLR's on rpd or alt.p, but it does
preclude discussing P&S on the rpd.slr-systems NG.

Perhaps, but it looks a bit elitist.

There are over 100,000 newsgroups. Perhaps all should all be x-posted
together to avoid any suggestion of elitism.

Now look who's acting like a troll. You might want to think about that
because, I assure you, I can play that game in my sleep. If you want to get
into Zen theology I can wipe the floor both ways with you. So, chill it.

You still don't get that rec.photo.digital is a more general NG than
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems?

Charles E Hardwidge wrote:

Whatever.

IAE, another way to cut the crap is to set the f-u. Done.

--
lsmft

John McWilliams wrote:
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:

Whatever.

IAE, another way to cut the crap is to set the f-u. Done.

Yes, what I've been doing to Mr. Hardwidge, however he doesn't
appreciate it in practice.

Alan Browne wrote:
John McWilliams wrote:
Charles E Hardwidge wrote:

Whatever.

IAE, another way to cut the crap is to set the f-u. Done.

Yes, what I've been doing to Mr. Hardwidge, however he doesn't
appreciate it in practice.

What I observed just recently was the removal of the froups, and without
notice, a little different than setting f-u's.
Peace with both your houses.
--

John McWilliams

Alan Browne wrote in
:


Recently many participants of these NGs have engaged the "P&S troll".
While the topic of P&S is acceptable in alt.phot and rec.photo.digital,
it is not acceptable in r.p.d.slr-systems.

Even to contrast performance against a DSLR? Seems a tad rigid.

Rich wrote:
Alan Browne wrote in
:

Recently many participants of these NGs have engaged the "P&S troll".
While the topic of P&S is acceptable in alt.phot and rec.photo.digital,
it is not acceptable in r.p.d.slr-systems.

Even to contrast performance against a DSLR? Seems a tad rigid.

Even that thread has gone bananas - but I was really referring to all
the crap x-posted by the P&S troll.