If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
An experiment
David Nebenzahl wrote: Cheesehead spake thus: David Nebenzahl wrote: Cheesehead spake thus: Here's the thought. For my 8x10, to use a variety of good barrel lenses, I'd like to take an old Baby Speed Graphic, remove the front and back, add mounting and a front lens board, and thus have a focal plane shutter on the fron to fthe 8x10. Has anyone done this? (Anyone got a Speed FS for parts?) Interesting idea. So how "thin" can you get the Baby Graphic? That would seem to be the limiting factor, since (I assume) you're going to put this in front of the 8x10's lensboard. I saw an old commercial unit of this type sell recently on eBay. IIRC, it went for about $160. So yesterday I asked Jim @ Midwest about them. He'd seen them in the past. So I started thinking about what might be involved in adding one to my current camera. The front standard is certainly solid enough and, if constructed correctly, there shouldn't be any more stress from it than from any heavy lens. Good, but you didn't answer my question: how thin can you get the parts you extract from the Baby Speed? By this I mean how thick will the whole gizmo (front standard + shutter) be? Will that leave enough room for 8x10 bellows, etc? -- Just as McDonald's is where you go when you're hungry but don't really care about the quality of your food, Wikipedia is where you go when you're curious but don't really care about the quality of your knowledge. - Matthew White's WikiWatch (http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo.htm) I'm not yet certain about the thickness. The shutter might need to be mounted in a different frame. Recessing the lens board into the Speed's body/box would also help compensate. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
An experiment
"Cheesehead" wrote in message
oups.com... Here's the thought. For my 8x10, to use a variety of good barrel lenses, I'd like to take an old Baby Speed Graphic, remove the front and back, add mounting and a front lens board, and thus have a focal plane shutter on the fron to fthe 8x10. Has anyone done this? Not done it, but I've also thought about it. Looking at the other replies, I'm not sure I agree with all the sentiments expressed: First, whether there's room to maintain infinity focus. I honestly don't see this as a very big problem, unless your camera is very 'incompressible' or you use some pretty wide lenses. My 10x8" 'compresses' (with standard bellows, I don't have bag bellows for it) to about 11cm. The shutter assembly on my Baby Speed Graphic is about 30mm deep across the shutter, but 45mm at the side where the controls are; if mounted on the front of a lensboard it could be recessed at least 5mm and still leave all the shutter controls easily accessible. _However_, a lens mounted to it needn't have its rear element level with the 'front' of the shutter but can have it set 'inside' the shutter so it's only just in front of the curtains - in fact it is probably best to do it like that anyway, and that puts the rear element of the lens only a little way in front of the position of the lensboard. All that says I, with my bellows and without mounting the shutter itself in a recessed lens board, cannot use a 120mm, and probably not a 165mm, but a 180mm, say, is probably not a problem. That's still pretty wide on 10x8". That's all taking the 'worse case' - ie., mounting the shutter on the front of the lens board in order to have access to the controls at all times. Second, access to controls. As indicated above, you could front mount the shutter on a lensboard, so there is no problem. Mounting it on the back would give use with wider lenses, but doesn't seem essential with most of the lenses I would use on 10x8". But, if you do do it that way, you can set the speed and wind the shutter before you insert the film holder- which is probably what you do with an ordinary shutter anyway, I know I do - and then put the lens board back on before you put in the film holder and pull the slide. Arranging for the shutter release to screw into the front of the board isn't that big a challenge. (If I was rear mounting the shutter like that, I would put it on the back of an adapter board: I use almost solely the smaller Arca 110mm lens boards to save size and weight, and for my 4x5, 5x7 and 10x8 Arcas, which all take the 141mm boards, have a couple of adapters. Putting the shutter on the back of one of these adapter boards would let it fit easily to the camera, and leave a ready attachment on the front for the lens.) For me the biggest problem is the fact that the lenses will always be mounted with their optical centres a long way in front of the lines about which the front standard pivots, making front tilts and swings more awkward to use: a nuisance rather than an insurmountable problem. I hope you go ahead with trying the experiment - because I'd love to hear how you get on before I try it myself! Cheers, Peter |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help with Image Category Experiment | PTKen | Digital Photography | 19 | April 29th 06 10:47 PM |
Help with Image Category Experiment | PTKen | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | April 29th 06 10:47 PM |
Large DOF experiment | Scott W | Digital Photography | 27 | December 8th 05 01:06 PM |
An Experiment | andre | Digital Photography | 14 | February 16th 05 04:26 AM |
.8 to 8mp experiment | hfs2 | Digital Photography | 54 | November 23rd 04 10:55 AM |