If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
hi,
I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback.. www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. thank you very much.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
"maya" wrote in message . com... I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback.. www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. If you ***MUST*** make a quick decision (unfortunate, and you MUST allow time to check out the gear, particularly any zoom lens, for defects while you can still exchange them. The D40/50/70/80/100/200 bodies all have DREADFUL viewfinders compared with the F2, which had one of the best ever, but the D80 and D200 are not as bad as the others. Avoid the D40 - it doesn't even AF with non "S" lenses (ridiculous!). None but the D200 will meter with non-AF lenses, but it is the most expensive of the group. The D80 is the likely best choice for you if price is an issue, but DO NOT attempt to mount non-AI/AIS lenses on it! For a single lens, the 18-70 or 18-135mm Nikkors may offer the best performance for the price, though they are not as good as the best non-zooms... (the FLs are multiplied by 1.5 to get the 35mm-camera equivalent FLs, so 18mm = 27mm - but there are very few good shorter FL lenses available for digital, unfortunately, and all are large and expensive). You could look into the Sony R-1, which has the equivalent of a 24-120mm lens... -- David Ruether http://www.ferrario.com/ruether |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
If you're used to an F2AS, do yourself a favor and get the D200 with, maybe,
the 18-200mm AFS VR or the 12-24mm wide zoom. You'll have a camera much more like what you're used to and it will make full (with exception of auto-focus on your older ones) use of your existing lenses. "David Ruether" wrote in message ... "maya" wrote in message . com... I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback.. www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. If you ***MUST*** make a quick decision (unfortunate, and you MUST allow time to check out the gear, particularly any zoom lens, for defects while you can still exchange them. The D40/50/70/80/100/200 bodies all have DREADFUL viewfinders compared with the F2, which had one of the best ever, but the D80 and D200 are not as bad as the others. Avoid the D40 - it doesn't even AF with non "S" lenses (ridiculous!). None but the D200 will meter with non-AF lenses, but it is the most expensive of the group. The D80 is the likely best choice for you if price is an issue, but DO NOT attempt to mount non-AI/AIS lenses on it! For a single lens, the 18-70 or 18-135mm Nikkors may offer the best performance for the price, though they are not as good as the best non-zooms... (the FLs are multiplied by 1.5 to get the 35mm-camera equivalent FLs, so 18mm = 27mm - but there are very few good shorter FL lenses available for digital, unfortunately, and all are large and expensive). You could look into the Sony R-1, which has the equivalent of a 24-120mm lens... -- David Ruether http://www.ferrario.com/ruether |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
David Ruether wrote:
"maya" wrote in message . com... I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback.. www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. If you ***MUST*** make a quick decision (unfortunate, and you MUST allow time to check out the gear, particularly any zoom lens, for defects while you can still exchange them. The D40/50/70/80/100/200 bodies all have DREADFUL viewfinders compared with the F2, which had one of the best ever, but the D80 and D200 are not as bad as the others. Avoid the D40 - it doesn't even AF with non "S" lenses (ridiculous!). None but the D200 will meter with non-AF lenses, but it is the most expensive of the group. The D80 is the likely best choice for you if price is an issue, but DO NOT attempt to mount non-AI/AIS lenses on it! For a single lens, the 18-70 or 18-135mm Nikkors may offer the best performance for the price, though they are not as good as the best non-zooms... (the FLs are multiplied by 1.5 to get the 35mm-camera equivalent FLs, so 18mm = 27mm - but there are very few good shorter FL lenses available for digital, unfortunately, and all are large and expensive). You could look into the Sony R-1, which has the equivalent of a 24-120mm lens... thank you very much for your response, David.. it's not such a rushed decision, I've been thinking about it for a long time, it's just that the closer I get to actually making the purchase the more nervous I get!! just found another great review of D80 here, http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D80/D80A.HTM.. it really seems like the best bang for buck.. thanks again.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
On Feb 6, 12:25 pm, maya wrote:
hi, I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback..www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. thank you very much.... Look at the D200, has the best feature set of non pro Nikon DSLRs. It has a build quality like your F2. Can use manual focus lenses too, but they have to be Ai or AiS, they have "feet" on the aperture ring. An older non Ai Nikkor can damage the camera's aperture connection to the lens. Older lenses can be converted. Focusing with a WA is a bit of a pain with these cameras, I use a 24 f2 with a D200, with a 105 micro I'm fine. The other problem you will run into is that the sensor is smaller, so your lenses act similar to lenses 1.5 their focal length. A 24 becomes a 36mm, a 17mm = 25mm. Takes a little getting used to, all Nikons DSLRs have this. I have 4 lenses 3 primes, a 17mm Tokina, a nice lens, the 24 f2 Nikon, a 55 micro, and a 70-210 f4 zoom, the set isn't perfect but works for me and cost less than a grand. If you want to use zooms, somehow they go with digital, the 18-70 Nikkor kit lens is good, but may not be wide enough for you, the 17-55, and the 17-35, the latter could be used on your F2, are excellent lenses with fairly high price tags. For wide angle lenses there are 12-24 Nikon and Tokina, and 10-20 Sigma, a 17mm Tokina is also a good choice . Tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
tomm42 wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:25 pm, maya wrote: hi, I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback..www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. thank you very much.... Look at the D200, has the best feature set of non pro Nikon DSLRs. It has a build quality like your F2. Can use manual focus lenses too, but they have to be Ai or AiS, they have "feet" on the aperture ring. An older non Ai Nikkor can damage the camera's aperture connection to the lens. Older lenses can be converted. Focusing with a WA is a bit of a pain with these cameras, I use a 24 f2 with a D200, with a 105 micro I'm fine. The other problem you will run into is that the sensor is smaller, so your lenses act similar to lenses 1.5 their focal length. A 24 becomes a 36mm, a 17mm = 25mm. Takes a little getting used to, all Nikons DSLRs have this. I have 4 lenses 3 primes, a 17mm Tokina, a nice lens, the 24 f2 Nikon, a 55 micro, and a 70-210 f4 zoom, the set isn't perfect but works for me and cost less than a grand. If you want to use zooms, somehow they go with digital, the 18-70 Nikkor kit lens is good, but may not be wide enough for you, the 17-55, and the 17-35, the latter could be used on your F2, are excellent lenses with fairly high price tags. For wide angle lenses there are 12-24 Nikon and Tokina, and 10-20 Sigma, a 17mm Tokina is also a good choice . Tom oh my gosh, two people say I should look @ D200 instead... ok, what are main differences, please, between D200 and D80 that will make it worth it (i.e., justifiable) for me to purchase the D200.. thank you very much.. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
On Feb 6, 12:42 pm, maya wrote:
oh my gosh, two people say I should look @ D200 instead... ok, what are main differences, please, between D200 and D80 that will make it worth it (i.e., justifiable) for me to purchase the D200.. One of the biggest is that the D200 will meter with non-AF lenses. If you have a large investment in Nikon glass that you would like to use with the DSLR, they will be easier to use with the D200. And of course, the D200 is overall a better camera with metal body and more features. I don't own one, but IMO the only way to go wrong with it is to spend the $$$ and not use it. If the $$$ are a concern, then consider the D80. Depending on the subject matter, metering may not be an issue. You can instantly review the captured image and use the graph (struggling for the correct term... Histogram! That's it) to review exposure. I have a D50 and could not be happier. Well... I suppose a D200 would make me happier. But I honestly have to say that I have plenty of room to improve with the D50. (IOW, I am not skillful enough to take better pictures given a better camera. Yet. HTH, hank |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
Hank has a good point: to a great degree, the camera doesn't matter...it's
the skill and imagination of the photographer that makes the difference! A better camera will just make it easier to take whatever quality of picture the photographer is currently capable of. I have a D200 and 90% of the time, my 18-200mm AF-S VR allows me to get the pictures I'm looking for. Once in a while I'll use some of my older Nikon glass...particularly my 55mm micro Nikkor, which is not auto-focus but works really well with the matrix metering in the camera. I like having a slightly sturdier, weather sealed camera when I go out, and the extra build quality and more flexible metering was worth it to me. On the other hand, I bought two D40s for Christmas for my adult son and daughter and tried them out before giving them as presents. Even the D40 with the kit 18-55mm lens does a great job. If using non AF-S lenses is not an issue, and you don't really care about having more megapixels (actually good 6MP cameras can make great photos) then you can really save yourself some money by going with the D40. It just depends on your needs. All of the latest DSLRs are pretty damn good. "HankB" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 6, 12:42 pm, maya wrote: oh my gosh, two people say I should look @ D200 instead... ok, what are main differences, please, between D200 and D80 that will make it worth it (i.e., justifiable) for me to purchase the D200.. One of the biggest is that the D200 will meter with non-AF lenses. If you have a large investment in Nikon glass that you would like to use with the DSLR, they will be easier to use with the D200. And of course, the D200 is overall a better camera with metal body and more features. I don't own one, but IMO the only way to go wrong with it is to spend the $$$ and not use it. If the $$$ are a concern, then consider the D80. Depending on the subject matter, metering may not be an issue. You can instantly review the captured image and use the graph (struggling for the correct term... Histogram! That's it) to review exposure. I have a D50 and could not be happier. Well... I suppose a D200 would make me happier. But I honestly have to say that I have plenty of room to improve with the D50. (IOW, I am not skillful enough to take better pictures given a better camera. Yet. HTH, hank |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
"maya" wrote in message
. com... tomm42 wrote: Look at the D200, has the best feature set of non pro Nikon DSLRs. It has a build quality like your F2. Can use manual focus lenses too, but they have to be Ai or AiS, they have "feet" on the aperture ring. An older non Ai Nikkor can damage the camera's aperture connection to the lens. Older lenses can be converted. Focusing with a WA is a bit of a pain with these cameras, I use a 24 f2 with a D200, with a 105 micro I'm fine. The other problem you will run into is that the sensor is smaller, so your lenses act similar to lenses 1.5 their focal length. A 24 becomes a 36mm, a 17mm = 25mm. Takes a little getting used to, all Nikons DSLRs have this. I have 4 lenses 3 primes, a 17mm Tokina, a nice lens, the 24 f2 Nikon, a 55 micro, and a 70-210 f4 zoom, the set isn't perfect but works for me and cost less than a grand. If you want to use zooms, somehow they go with digital, the 18-70 Nikkor kit lens is good, but may not be wide enough for you, the 17-55, and the 17-35, the latter could be used on your F2, are excellent lenses with fairly high price tags. For wide angle lenses there are 12-24 Nikon and Tokina, and 10-20 Sigma, a 17mm Tokina is also a good choice . Tom oh my gosh, two people say I should look @ D200 instead... ok, what are main differences, please, between D200 and D80 that will make it worth it (i.e., justifiable) for me to purchase the D200.. thank you very much.. I've also had a F2AS for nearly 30 years, although I've only shot 2 rolls of film on it since getting my D70 3 years ago, and don't think I've used it all since upgrading to a D200 just under a year ago. I'm assuming you have a collection of AI manual focus lenses to go with your F2AS. If so, then the chief advantage of the D200 is that is will meter with them. You could still mount them on the D80, but would need to carry a hand-held meter if you planned on using them extensively. If on the other hand you plan to replace all your AI MF lenses with modern AF lenses, then the price advantage of the D80 will help you do that. You will probably need to buy at least one new lens (18-70, 18-200, or 12-24mm) because one any Nikon DSLR, your 24mm will only have the angle of view that a 36mm would have on your F2AS (though as such it is still pretty useful, and my MF 24mm is possibly the MF lens I use most often on my D200). -- Apteryx |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
long-time Nikon F2AS user -- which SRL digital is best?
"maya" wrote in message
. com... I'm getting ready to purchase a digital camera; for a while was considering a point-and-shoot for the time being to save money; however, none of them have wide-angle lenses.. and the vast majority of what I shoot these days (actually for years now) is with a wide-angle; my "normal" lens is a 24mm.. have barely touched my 50mm in the last six years or so.. (am putting together a photoblog, would appreciate some feedback.. www.francesdelrio.com/photoblog/.. thank you..) I have been using a Nikon F2AS for about thirty years, so this is where I'm coming from.. am considering either Nikon D50, D70, or D80 (is it true the D40 has a different lens-mounting system from the others? why would they do that?) I think I'm going with Nikon D80.. but not 100% sure yet... am traveling to India in about four days (didn't know firm travel-date till now, trip is job-related..) so need to make a decision double-quick.. this is a big investment and I want to make sure to invest wisely... thus would appreciate opinions from knowledgeable folks here.. I'd say look at the D50 & D70s if you don't mind the rather small viewfinder, or the D80 if you want a viewfinder that uses a glass prism. Nikkor AF-D primes seem to get expensive any wider than the 20/2.8 which would act like a 30mm with film, which *might* be OK for you. This lens is certainly the next one that I want to get! If you are a keen wide angle shooter then the 12-24/4 would seem an obvious choice if you don't mind being limited to f4. There is always the 14/2.8 AF-D once you have a bit (I mean a lot!) more money. Have fun! Cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long Time Away from this board | Rudy | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | January 9th 07 05:39 AM |
Nikon user to Canon user questions... | Andrew McCall | 35mm Photo Equipment | 20 | November 2nd 04 11:31 PM |