If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Olympus engraving the LIE on their lens barrels now
On 02/02/2011 19:41, Rich wrote:
The equivalency lie, that 300mm at 4/3rds = 600mm on 35mm. This did have some validity, when 35mm sensors were confined to the SAME PIXEL count as Olympus (12) megapixel, but the idea that 4/3rds at 12 megapixels is = 35mm at 18-24mp (where they are now) is pure B.S. Forget the ISO performance, and the DR, the resolution is no longer comparable on a 2x basis as they are claiming. Give it up, Olympus. http://www.eprice.com.hk/dc/talk/12/2430/ Following that logic no lens manufacturer would dare put and focal range on their lenses as who knows what the pixel count or even the size of the sensor (in some cases) they would be paired with either now or in five years time. Most P+S cameras are advertised with some reference to the equivalent 35mm optical range and this is essential because of the varying senor size etc. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Olympus engraving the LIE on their lens barrels now | Mike[_23_] | Digital Photography | 0 | February 3rd 11 12:50 PM |