If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
Don't feed the trolls (minor typo corrections)
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:13:37 +1100, Noons wrote
in : It's a bot, not a person... Why do you think so? Based on analysis of the posts, I think it's more likely a person than a bot. -- Best regards, John [Please Note: Ads belong (only) in rec.photo.marketplace.digital] |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
Don't feed the trolls (minor typo corrections)
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:51:08 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:24:34 -0500, Alan Browne wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:24:03 -0500, Alan Browne wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:59:27 -0600, Don Stauffer wrote: Don't feed the trolls! But they are SO hungry! You just reduce your own reputation by feeding them. But you just tossed a bone to it as well, with that comment. An unfortunate tax that is far less than the damage you do with your constant troll feeding. eg: I'm asking you to stop for the betterment of the NG; I'm not replying to the troll, you are. Please stop, it is the only proven way to starve trolls off of NG's. But I was just responding to you, and it still generated a response. That's my point. *plonk* Thanks for the compliment! |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
Don't feed the trolls (minor typo corrections)
John Navas wrote,on my timestamp of 21/12/2008 5:20 AM:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:13:37 +1100, Noons wrote in : It's a bot, not a person... Why do you think so? Based on analysis of the posts, I think it's more likely a person than a bot. A person that is online 24 hours per day? Sure... |
#254
|
|||
|
|||
Don't feed the trolls (minor typo corrections)
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:07:56 +1100, Noons wrote
in : John Navas wrote,on my timestamp of 21/12/2008 5:20 AM: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:13:37 +1100, Noons wrote in : It's a bot, not a person... Why do you think so? Based on analysis of the posts, I think it's more likely a person than a bot. A person that is online 24 hours per day? Sure... That's just the kind of person who does that sort of thing. -- Best regards, John [Please Note: Ads belong (only) in rec.photo.marketplace.digital] |
#255
|
|||
|
|||
Don't feed the trolls (minor typo corrections)
In article , John Navas
wrote: A person that is online 24 hours per day? Sure... That's just the kind of person who does that sort of thing. As opposed to the kind of person who posts the same moronic drivel every couple of weeks in the Motorola cell phone group? |
#256
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D-5000
Anyone tried the new Nikon D-5000? It seems to be positioned between
the "entry level" D-60 and the "enthusiast level" D-90. I'm giving up on my old (3.3 mpixel) Nikon 995 -- it just doesn't cut in any more. earle * |
#257
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D-5000
On 2009-05-17 22:35:34 -0700, Earle Jones said:
Anyone tried the new Nikon D-5000? It seems to be positioned between the "entry level" D-60 and the "enthusiast level" D-90. I'm giving up on my old (3.3 mpixel) Nikon 995 -- it just doesn't cut in any more. earle * Why on Earth did you resurrect this thread initiated by the P&S troll? If you have a question start a new thread! -- Regards, Savageduck |
#258
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D-5000
Yes, I have try it. It is very nice camera. The picture quality is as D90
but the Live view is better and faster. The only minus is that the display has not the resolution and size of D90's. BTW, 995 was my favorite camera ever for comfortable shooting. I hope that Nikon one day will make a new semipro like that. S10 was bad camera, very basic. -- Dimitris M Anyone tried the new Nikon D-5000? It seems to be positioned between the "entry level" D-60 and the "enthusiast level" D-90. I'm giving up on my old (3.3 mpixel) Nikon 995 -- it just doesn't cut in any more. |
#259
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D-5000
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Earle Jones wrote:
Anyone tried the new Nikon D-5000? It seems to be positioned between the "entry level" D-60 and the "enthusiast level" D-90. I'm giving up on my old (3.3 mpixel) Nikon 995 -- it just doesn't cut in any more. Does that mean that I have to decommission my Nikon 990? -- --- Paul J. Gans |
#260
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D-5000
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Paul J Gans wrote:
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Earle Jones wrote: I'm giving up on my old (3.3 mpixel) Nikon 995 -- it just doesn't cut in any more. Does that mean that I have to decommission my Nikon 990? Nope. Both the 990 and 995 excel at macro photography. And you need a second camera to take pictures when you want to sell your other camera on eBay. So keep it. Make it your eBay sales camera. Don www.donwiss.com/pictures/ (e-mail link at page bottoms). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR (minor typo corrections) | A REAL-Pro Photographer | Digital Photography | 313 | May 20th 09 02:14 PM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR (minor typo corrections) | A REAL-Pro Photographer | 35mm Photo Equipment | 250 | May 19th 09 03:35 PM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | Digital Photography | 3 | November 8th 08 01:36 AM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | Other Photographic Equipment | 3 | November 8th 08 01:36 AM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | November 5th 08 08:10 AM |