If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"jjs" wrote in message ...
"Richard Knoppow" wrote in message ... Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. Richard, did you catch the earlier conversation in which people asserted that cosmic radiation (of various sorts) will fog film regardless of freezing down to Zero F? Seems like bull to me. It isn't. Gamma rays, bubba... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Richard Knoppow wrote: Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. I hate to contradict Richard, but I had some 4164 TriX and 4147 PlusX that were stored in a freezer for about 2 decades, and the EI dropped to about 1/4 the box speed and the fog level about tripled. That ended my stockpiling film for the long term. Now the freezer worked, and was set around 0F. This was in New Jersey, and I do not know if the radioactive leaks from our nuclear power plants did it, or the contaminated air that got through those plasticized inner bags, or what, but it happened nonetheless. Interesting! I wonder if that's what's wrong with my Delta 100? I shot a couple rolls recently that I'd had stored for a long time in the freezer in double plastic freezer bags plus the cellophane around the brick of film. Thawed it gradually as usual, and when I exposed it at its normal ISO, got negs that were barely exposed at all. Made only the faintest image on the film. I had been chalking it up to something I screwed up in mixing my developer, but now I'm wondering if I simply lost film speed due to five years in the freezer. I'll have to test some other rolls from the brick and shoot them at different speeds. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
LR Kalajainen wrote:
Jean-David Beyer wrote: Richard Knoppow wrote: Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. I hate to contradict Richard, but I had some 4164 TriX and 4147 PlusX that were stored in a freezer for about 2 decades, and the EI dropped to about 1/4 the box speed and the fog level about tripled. That ended my stockpiling film for the long term. Now the freezer worked, and was set around 0F. This was in New Jersey, and I do not know if the radioactive leaks from our nuclear power plants did it, or the contaminated air that got through those plasticized inner bags, or what, but it happened nonetheless. Interesting! I wonder if that's what's wrong with my Delta 100? I shot a couple rolls recently that I'd had stored for a long time in the freezer in double plastic freezer bags plus the cellophane around the brick of film. Thawed it gradually as usual, and when I exposed it at its normal ISO, got negs that were barely exposed at all. Made only the faintest image on the film. I had been chalking it up to something I screwed up in mixing my developer, but now I'm wondering if I simply lost film speed due to five years in the freezer. I'll have to test some other rolls from the brick and shoot them at different speeds. I do not know about 5 years. My film had been frozen from new for almost 20 years, so at least 10 years out of date. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 20:45:00 up 22 days, 7:50, 4 users, load average: 4.30, 4.25, 4.19 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
LR Kalajainen wrote:
Jean-David Beyer wrote: Richard Knoppow wrote: Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. I hate to contradict Richard, but I had some 4164 TriX and 4147 PlusX that were stored in a freezer for about 2 decades, and the EI dropped to about 1/4 the box speed and the fog level about tripled. That ended my stockpiling film for the long term. Now the freezer worked, and was set around 0F. This was in New Jersey, and I do not know if the radioactive leaks from our nuclear power plants did it, or the contaminated air that got through those plasticized inner bags, or what, but it happened nonetheless. Interesting! I wonder if that's what's wrong with my Delta 100? I shot a couple rolls recently that I'd had stored for a long time in the freezer in double plastic freezer bags plus the cellophane around the brick of film. Thawed it gradually as usual, and when I exposed it at its normal ISO, got negs that were barely exposed at all. Made only the faintest image on the film. I had been chalking it up to something I screwed up in mixing my developer, but now I'm wondering if I simply lost film speed due to five years in the freezer. I'll have to test some other rolls from the brick and shoot them at different speeds. I do not know about 5 years. My film had been frozen from new for almost 20 years, so at least 10 years out of date. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 20:45:00 up 22 days, 7:50, 4 users, load average: 4.30, 4.25, 4.19 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Jean-David Beyer" wrote in message ... LR Kalajainen wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: Richard Knoppow wrote: Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. I hate to contradict Richard, but I had some 4164 TriX and 4147 PlusX that were stored in a freezer for about 2 decades, and the EI dropped to about 1/4 the box speed and the fog level about tripled. That ended my stockpiling film for the long term. Now the freezer worked, and was set around 0F. This was in New Jersey, and I do not know if the radioactive leaks from our nuclear power plants did it, or the contaminated air that got through those plasticized inner bags, or what, but it happened nonetheless. I rather doubd radiation fron the nuclear plant caused any problems. The shielding is good enough to stop the particles causing film degredation. I would guess there was a chemical degredation in this case from something in the freezer. Several "normal" gasses will cause this and in a confined space the effect would be intensified. Over a l-o-n-g time cosmic rays will cause damage. And how can one know for sure about the condition of the film before freezing? Interesting! I wonder if that's what's wrong with my Delta 100? I shot a couple rolls recently that I'd had stored for a long time in the freezer in double plastic freezer bags plus the cellophane around the brick of film. Thawed it gradually as usual, and when I exposed it at its normal ISO, got negs that were barely exposed at all. Made only the faintest image on the film. I had been chalking it up to something I screwed up in mixing my developer, but now I'm wondering if I simply lost film speed due to five years in the freezer. I'll have to test some other rolls from the brick and shoot them at different speeds. Do you have a freezer dedicated to photographic film? Film packs are perfectly sealed from light but not gasses. I've had paper fogged by being in the presence of very dilute sulfur dioxide (please don't ask). I do not know about 5 years. My film had been frozen from new for almost 20 years, so at least 10 years out of date. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 20:45:00 up 22 days, 7:50, 4 users, load average: 4.30, 4.25, 4.19 I have now bought out the stock of Kodak and Ilford film and paper from every vendor within driving range and stored it in the bomb shelter I built in the '60s, used for fuel oil in the '70S, converted to a disco in the '80s, and gold and currency in the '90s. I have sufficient amount at least for my great grandchildren, unless The Flood comes ;-) dr bob. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"jjs" wrote in message ... "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message ... Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. Richard, did you catch the earlier conversation in which people asserted that cosmic radiation (of various sorts) will fog film regardless of freezing down to Zero F? Seems like bull to me. Cosmic rays do cause some fogging but mostly on fast film. I don't think they have any effect on paper emulsions. Most of the degradation of film comes from continuation of the ripening process and from other slow chemical changes in the emulsion. Freezing should slow this down very considerably but it may still go on. Some polutants can cause rapid damage to the emulsion. Strong oxidizers and sulfides are particular examples. Sulfide, for instance, is an important sensitizer but in excessive amounts is a very prodigeous fogging agent. That is why it is recommended that sulfiding toners not be used where unprocessed film or paper is stored. I can't explain the problems with the frozen film but this does not seem to be the common experience with it. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"jjs" wrote in message ... "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message ... Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. Richard, did you catch the earlier conversation in which people asserted that cosmic radiation (of various sorts) will fog film regardless of freezing down to Zero F? Seems like bull to me. Cosmic rays do cause some fogging but mostly on fast film. I don't think they have any effect on paper emulsions. Most of the degradation of film comes from continuation of the ripening process and from other slow chemical changes in the emulsion. Freezing should slow this down very considerably but it may still go on. Some polutants can cause rapid damage to the emulsion. Strong oxidizers and sulfides are particular examples. Sulfide, for instance, is an important sensitizer but in excessive amounts is a very prodigeous fogging agent. That is why it is recommended that sulfiding toners not be used where unprocessed film or paper is stored. I can't explain the problems with the frozen film but this does not seem to be the common experience with it. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"jjs" wrote in message ... "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message ... Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. Richard, did you catch the earlier conversation in which people asserted that cosmic radiation (of various sorts) will fog film regardless of freezing down to Zero F? Seems like bull to me. Cosmic rays do cause some fogging but mostly on fast film. I don't think they have any effect on paper emulsions. Most of the degradation of film comes from continuation of the ripening process and from other slow chemical changes in the emulsion. Freezing should slow this down very considerably but it may still go on. Some polutants can cause rapid damage to the emulsion. Strong oxidizers and sulfides are particular examples. Sulfide, for instance, is an important sensitizer but in excessive amounts is a very prodigeous fogging agent. That is why it is recommended that sulfiding toners not be used where unprocessed film or paper is stored. I can't explain the problems with the frozen film but this does not seem to be the common experience with it. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On 10/14/2004 6:21 AM jjs spake thus:
"Richard Knoppow" wrote in message ... Freezing pretty well stops any chemical changes in the film. Frozen film will stay "fresh" for decades. Richard, did you catch the earlier conversation in which people asserted that cosmic radiation (of various sorts) will fog film regardless of freezing down to Zero F? Seems like bull to me. Huh? Say what? How would freezing stop fogging due to cosmic radiation? Once the "rays" (particles) hit the film, it's fogged, regardless of temperature. Freezing ain't gonna stop that. -- Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it. - Noam Chomsky |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Marco Milazzo" wrote in message ... Thanks for lots of good information here. A follow-up question: I noticed that the outdated film I shot looks fogged. Is fog ever desirable, or is it always undesirable? For instance, Ansel Adams recommends pre-exposure (you might say "pre-fogging") for certain contrastry situations. Is aged film fog the same thing -- or is it always a degraded image? TIA, Marco A pre-exposure will lower contrast on some films and can be used to increase speed for long exposures but it is unpredictable. Some emulsions loose contrast as they age but not because of fog. Its due to the chemical changes I mentioned in an earlier post. The chemistry of the emulsion is very complex. Emulsions are well stabilized but are not perfectly stable so they will change over time. The expiration date is usually the manufacturer's estimate of how long the film can be counted on to deliver the performance specified in its data sheets given "average" storage conditions. Heat accelerates chemical reactions including those in the emulsion so storing film or paper where its cool will extend its life. Moisture is another problem but will not affect unopened packages of film or paper. Its possible that freezing can damage the emulsion in some way. Remember that moisture is driven out by freezing. Think about the effect of freezing on food. It may stay unspoiled for long periods of time but may not taste the same. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upcoming Film Price Wars - Kodak vs. Fuji... | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 63 | October 24th 04 06:07 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | Digital Photography | 213 | July 28th 04 06:30 PM |
Help: Newbie 35mm Film Question | Keith | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | July 14th 04 06:26 PM |
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |