If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
Hello all,
Let me start by asking: If this topic is not pertinent for this newsgroup - please advise and I will post elsewhe suggestions as to where to post would be appreciated. Also, my description below will be quite long, but hopefully will provide enough information for someone to point me in the right direction. My wife recently surprised me with my first digital SLR after shooting film for about 3-4 years. My camera is a Pentax ist DL (35mm format). I also have a Canon Pixma ip6600D photo printer that is relatively new, and I am currently using Photoshop v7.0. Photography is strictly a hobby for me at this point, and I am only beginning to learn the role that monitor calibration, printer profiles and color spaces play in the digital photo workflow. I have made initial attempts to calibrate my monitor, although it has been srtictly with freely available software (Monitor Calibration Wizard 1.0 at hex2bit.com) and not an industry standard hardware device. I would like to think that my monitor is reasonably calibrated enough that it alone would not account for the drastic color issue I am experiencing below. Not long ago, I took my son on a little photo shoot around town. The sun/sky seemed to be playing nicely together on this particular day. These shots were taken about 5.00pm - 5.30pm in Arizona. One of the shots i was pleased with had my son wearing a red shirt, crawling on a brick surface with water/fountains in the frame. All shots were taken in RAW format. When I got home, I converted my RAW file to .tif using the Pentax software. I then opened my .tif in Photoshop and made some minor adjustments (levels, unsharp mask, contrast). I was working in the Adobe RGB color space in Photoshop. When I went to print the photo, the printed version came out a bit darker than expected. But more importantly, the red shirt that my son was wearing, and which looked quite vibrant on my screen, was printed out very faded or washed out, nowhere near the red color I was seeing on my screen - eliminating one of the primary points of color in my picture. Here is a url of my picture showing my problem (of course, if the monitor is solely responsible, then what I see will not be what you see!) http://www.57thstreet.net/photograph...olorSpace.html I have spent the past week or so trying to understand why there was such a difference between what I saw on my screen and what printed out - particularly with regard to the red shirt. I have read many articles, newsgroup posts, etc. I believe I have learned a great deal from my quest, but I'm not sure I yet have a good handle on all of the aspects pertinent to my situation, which is why I am posting here. I began to read about the CMYK color space for printing and it's smaller color gamut compared to Adobe RGB. My first question is: #1 Does the traditional CMYK color space still apply to today's consumer level photo printers, such as the Canon Pixma ip6600d (which is comprised of the following ink tanks: CLI-8 Black, CLI-8 Cyan, CLI-8 Magenta, CLI-8 Yellow, CLI-8 Photo Cyan, CLI-8 Photo Magenta)? I began to learn about how to let the printer manage the colors as well as how to allow photoshop to manage the colors (preventing the printer from doing so). Trying both approaches ( I believe i setup everything correctly), my printed results didnt change much - the red shirt was nowhere near as vibrant as I had hoped. Next, I began learning about printer profiles and soft proofing in Photoshop. I downloaded some suggested printer profiles from Canon that I found referenced in a newsgroup post which were supposedly compatible with various types of paper and the ip6600d. When I proofed the image in Photoshop, and printed them using these profiles, the red shirt was still faded, significantly lacking impact of the vibrant red. Similarly, I proofed/printed the image using working CMYK and again, the red shirt and red tones in the bricks were lost (faded, darker). One of the resources I found (which may or may not have had me barking up the wrong tree) is: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...ad.php?t=29530 Now, it seems to me the fact the photoshop "proofing" can predict what my printout will look like (faded red and all, with both Canon profiles and CMYK working profile) led me to believe that I simply was dealing with a shade of red that was outside what the printer was capable of reproducing. I believed that this ruled out printer head problems, low ink problems, etc. I also realize that the type of paper I use could impact the colors, but it didn't seem likely that it would have that large of an impact, and only on one color (red). Incidentally, i was using Kodak Premium Glossy 4x6 paper and a few attempts at plain paper - both yielding similar results a far as my shade of red was concerned. However, it seemed strange to me that the red was so far off - surely a more suitable replacement tone could have been found within the gamut. So I took my Adobe RGB .tif file to the local camera store and their generic (insert card, make prints instantly) machine. I have not had the chance to get to my local pro printing lab yet. It is a bit of a drive, and I hoped to get some more info from this post/ additoinal web research (if not a solution!) before heading out to see them. I inserted my card, printed the picture, and although some other colors and blue tones came out mildy different than I expected, the red was much closer to the vibrant color I was hopnig for. Now, I am certain that the Kodak kiosk I used implemented their color correction process implemented for the general public and their vacation photos (and apparently, people like me!) But it did leave me with more questions: #2 Even though photoshop proofed my image to have the red appear very faded, how did the kodak kiosk manage to print a red more in line with what I expected? Again, does my ip6600D adhere to CMYK, but the Kodak Kiosk is capable of more? As I think I mentioned before, when I proof in Photoshop with any of the Canon profiles, my once vibrant Adobe RGB image looks faded accross the whole image, washed out under every profile. Same goes when I proof for CMYK. Surely even mid level photo printers are capable of better than what I am seeing. What is also strange is that I have printed a handful of other images on this printer. One of the images is a shot of my son on christmas morning in bright red pajamas. (This was shot in jpg). When I view that image in PS in Adobe RGB space, it is vibrant, crisp, reds look great. A month or so ago, I printed out this image, and the printout I got was much more in line with what I expected, the red relatively vibrant. This was a quick "open the image, sharpen, print" - This was before I learned anything about proofing, color space, etc. Now, if I take this image and proof it in photoshop using either CMYK or Canon profiles - the red in the pajamas also looks faded. So I wonder, how did my print from a month ago come out crisp when the proof i am seeing now is as faded as the shot of my son at the water fountains? # 3 In my quest to fix things, did I inadvertantly mis-adjust something else, causing the problem I am seeing now? I am failing to see a pattern here which is why I am writing. I am hoping to learn what part of the digital workflow (RAW file, monitor, Adobe RGB profile, proofing, CMYK/printing profiles, printing) is most responsible for my faded red problem. Incidentally, I printed the Adobe RGB image directly from the memory card (plugged card into printer, removing photoshop/PC from the equation). Same effect of getting a print where the reds were significantly washed out compared to what i am seeing on the screen in Adobe RGB (but in line with what I see in CMYK). # 4 Why am I now having such difficulty printing the red I see on my screen, yet Kodak Kiosk came pretty darn close to reproducing it. # 5 If it turns out I simply need to do better post processing in photoshop, what types of things can I do to prepare my image to print more in line with what I am expecting? I undersand that entire areas of study at 4 year colleges are dedicated to fully understanding color, light, printing, proofing, etc. My hope is that I will be able to come at least close to printing my photos at home as I expect without needing that 4 year degree. Any advice, answers, pointers, resources would be most appreicated. And thank you to anyone who has made it this far down in my explanation. - Andy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
"magicrat" wrote in message ... Hello all, Let me start by asking: If this topic is not pertinent for this newsgroup - please advise and I will post elsewhe suggestions as to where to post would be appreciated. Also, my description below will be quite long, but hopefully will provide enough information for someone to point me in the right direction. Snip a comprehensive post I undersand that entire areas of study at 4 year colleges are dedicated to fully understanding color, light, printing, proofing, etc. My hope is that I will be able to come at least close to printing my photos at home as I expect without needing that 4 year degree. Any advice, answers, pointers, resources would be most appreicated. And thank you to anyone who has made it this far down in my explanation. - Andy I'm not sure if I can help but I had similar problems when I bought a Canon 350D and used Adobe colour space as the setting . I thought I would get better results in Photoshop using this setting - I got odd colour results, probably because of my lack of understanding of the whole process. I have ended up using sRGB in the camera and in Photoshop. I calibrated my monitor using Adobe gamma in control panel. I then experimented with setting in my printer -an Epson 1290. I use the default settings in the printer except for the gamma setting. I found that printing with a gamma of 1.5 produced truer colours than the 1.8 setting in default. I am probably not making full use of the potential of this complex system - but I do get pictures I like. I often adjust saturation etc in Photoshop but if I print images as the camera takes them they are generally quite good. John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
"magicrat" wrote in message ... #1 Does the traditional CMYK color space still apply to today's consumer level photo printers, such as the Canon Pixma ip6600d (which is comprised of the following ink tanks: CLI-8 Black, CLI-8 Cyan, CLI-8 Magenta, CLI-8 Yellow, CLI-8 Photo Cyan, CLI-8 Photo Magenta)? No. For desktop publishing, forget CMYK. 99.99% of all printer drivers expect RGB. They will *accept* CMYK if they get it, but results are unpredictable and generally not good. The remaining 0.01% of drivers that do accept CMYK are specialized RIPs. Generally these are very expensive ($1K) and available only for high-end "pro" model printers like the Epson x600 and x800 series. Bear in mind that several of the newest inkjet printers are now using blue, green, and/or red inks in addition to CcMmYK. Canon just announced a model with ten inks, for example. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
"magicrat" wrote in message ... Hello all, I have spent the past week or so trying to understand why there was such a difference between what I saw on my screen and what printed out - particularly with regard to the red shirt. I have read many articles, newsgroup posts, etc. I believe I have learned a great deal from my quest, but I'm not sure I yet have a good handle on all of the aspects pertinent to my situation, which is why I am posting here. I began to read about the CMYK color space for printing and it's smaller color gamut compared to Adobe RGB. My first question is: #1 Does the traditional CMYK color space still apply to today's consumer level photo printers, such as the Canon Pixma ip6600d (which is comprised of the following ink tanks: CLI-8 Black, CLI-8 Cyan, CLI-8 Magenta, CLI-8 Yellow, CLI-8 Photo Cyan, CLI-8 Photo Magenta)? No, the traditional CMYK color space does not and never has applied to inkjet printers. The printer drivers require and expect an RGB file, If you send them a CMYK file, the driver must first convert it to an approximation of RGB and then convert the approximation back to yet another approximation of CMYK. These two steps usually result in disaster. The first thing you should do is calibrate your monitor and to calibrate your printer. You may find that the printer manufacturer's profiles are good enough. Next, you must insure that the profile isn't being used twice. I turn off color management in the printer driver.. Yes, it is correct that many CMYK profiles (there are more than one) have a smaller gamut than Adobe RGB. sRGB also has a smaller gamut. Jim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
magicrat wrote:
Hello all, Let me start by asking: If this topic is not pertinent for this newsgroup - please advise and I will post elsewhe suggestions as to where to post would be appreciated. Also, my description below will be quite long, but hopefully will provide enough information for someone to point me in the right direction. Well it's better to provide too much information than too little! Others have addressed some of your specific questions fairly well so I'll just give you some workflow suggestions. First, use a different RAW converter. The Pentax-supplied software will get you by if you don't have anything else but there are *free8 alternatives that are much better. Pixmantec's RawShooter Essentials is highly recommended (and, yes, it's freeware): http://www.pixmantec.com/products/ra...essentials.asp Sounds like you're on the right track with monitor calibration, though solutions with a feedback system like the Colorvision Spyder are obviously better, I think what you're doing should be sufficient for the time being. Convert the RAW file into a 16-bit TIFF using RawShooter Essentials or other software, getting it looking as close as possible to the way you want it at this stage and then using Photoshop for final tweaking. Adobe RGB colorspace is a good choice since you're optimizing for print. Now in Photoshop, activate Gamut Warning (under the View menu). This will highlight any colors that are beyond CMYK colorspace (saturated RGB primaries of red, green and blue are major candidates). If you have a lot of highlighted areas you have trouble. You can correct the image substantially by going to Image - Adjustments - Selective Color. It would take a major essay to describe how to use this control. Experimentation will get you headed in the right direction much quicker than you think. Just don't adjust any control a *lot* is my advice If you can't eliminate all the highlighted areas, just remove as much as you can without making the image look too wonky. (Turn Gamut Warning OFF to check.) Now for printing. CMYK is only for pre-press preparation. You want to keep everything RGB. Your printer driver will make the necessary conversions appropriate to your specific printer. To print, go to the File menu and select Print With Preview (not plain "Print"). Select Show More Options if it's visible. Look in the Color Handling drop-down box and select either "Let Photoshop Determine Colors" or "Let Printer Determine Colors". IMPORTANT: "Let Printer Determine Colors" really means "Let Print DRIVER Determine Colors" - Adobe doesn't really make this clear. I suggest this latter choice for now. Under Printer Profile select either Adobe RGB 1998 or the printer-specific profile for the paper you're using (if you've loaded any - I'd guess not from what you've said). Under Rendering Intent "Relative Colorimetric" is a good general choice but I'd go with "Perceptual" if you had a lot of out-of-gamut color you couldn't correct with the Selective Color adjustment. Click the Page Setup button and, in the dialog that opens, click Printer. In *that* new dialog, click Properties to open your print driver dialog. Select paper type, size, etc. as appropriate. There should also be options for color management. I can't be very specific here because the options available will depend on your printer/print driver but this is important: If you earlier chose "Let Photoshop Determine Colors" you need to turn OFF color management in your print driver. If you selected "Let Printer Determine Colors" you need to make sure color management in your print driver is ON. Remember, you want either Photoshop OR your print driver controlling color management, but not both! Close out all dialog boxes and you should be back at the Print With Preview window. Click Print and see what you get. If you've done everything right the new print should be at least close enough that you can achieve success with just a little more adjustment in Photoshop. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
"magicrat" wrote in message
... Hello all, Let me start by asking: If this topic is not pertinent for this newsgroup - please advise and I will post elsewhe suggestions as to where to post would be appreciated. Also, my description below will be quite long, but hopefully will provide enough information for someone to point me in the right direction. Hi. Welcome to the wonderfully confusing world of colour management. I Joke. Forget about CMYK. There are a number of things you have not made clear, and you could not be expected to know the significance yet. Have you calibrated your Monitor using Adobe Gamma, but that will only work for CRT Monitors. Flat Panels need to be calibrated using a Hardware Device. (Spyder 2 or similar). What Profile is the Camera set to, Adobe or sRGB. What Profile is being specified in the Adobe Raw Converter. You have set up PS for Adobe RGB, have you set up the other boxes for miss matches to "Convert to Working Space Profile", and "ask before"? I have to ask, what Paper is specified in the Printer Profile you are using. If it is a Canon Profile you can be sure it is not for Kodak Paper. I would suggest switching to a Canon paper, and using the Canon Profile for that paper in the Printer. Again I have to ask, which Ink is in the Printer, Canon Printer Profiles will assume Canon Ink. I do not use a Canon Printer, so I am not sure how to turn of the Colour Management in your Printer, or how to specify which Profile the Printer should use. I believe these tasks are a bit more complicated than they are in Epson Printers. The basic workflow is. Open the Image in PS. If the Tagged profile is different from your Working Space, PS will ask to Convert it. When you go to Print with Preview, in C. Management, you will see a box specifying the "Source Profile", this should be your Working Space, Adobe RGB. Below that is a box for the "Output", this is where you specify the Printer / Paper Profile. Once this is done you then get into the Printer Driver, and go through the process of completely turning off its Colour Management. The alternative is to choose in PS Output, "Management by Printer", and then choose the correct Profile in the Printer Driver, and let the Printer do the management. It is important that only one of PS or the Printer uses the Printer Profile, double Profiling guarantees wrong colour. I would suggest that you have a read at some of the specialised sites such as www.computer-darkroom.com or some of the others which will be suggested very soon. It is difficult, but if I can do it then so can anyone. Roy G |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
Thank you all for the wonderful responses. I'm happy to report that I
seem to be on the right trail based on all the suggestions, but still not achieving what I hope to. Some answers/notes inline below... Tesco News wrote: "magicrat" wrote in message ... Hello all, Let me start by asking: If this topic is not pertinent for this newsgroup - please advise and I will post elsewhe suggestions as to where to post would be appreciated. Also, my description below will be quite long, but hopefully will provide enough information for someone to point me in the right direction. Hi. Welcome to the wonderfully confusing world of colour management. I Joke. Forget about CMYK. There are a number of things you have not made clear, and you could not be expected to know the significance yet. Have you calibrated your Monitor using Adobe Gamma, but that will only work for CRT Monitors. Flat Panels need to be calibrated using a Hardware Device. (Spyder 2 or similar). Using a Dell FP1905 flat panel, my amateur calibration effort was made using hex2bit.com's Monitor Calibration Wizard 1.0 What Profile is the Camera set to, Adobe or sRGB. sRGB (now thinking that maybe there are some implications here which I'm not grasping??) What Profile is being specified in the Adobe Raw Converter. adobe RGB (I had previously tried Raw Essentials 2005 but there was no support for Pentax istDL Raw. Thanks to Mark's mention of it again, I went back... low and behold, RSE 2006 is available, and conversion for Pentax istDL works fine now!) You have set up PS for Adobe RGB, have you set up the other boxes for miss matches to "Convert to Working Space Profile", and "ask before"? I have - "ask when opening" for mismatches and missing profiles, at which point I choose "open with Adobe RGB" I have to ask, what Paper is specified in the Printer Profile you are using. If it is a Canon Profile you can be sure it is not for Kodak Paper. since your comment, i have tinkered with paper settings, still not achieiving what I hope. ink in printer is Canon branded ink I did try printing a different photo (same red shirt, same shoot/lighting) on Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy as per canon's [hidden] documentation I found at: http://homepage.mac.com/renard/ls/Ca...file_Guide.pdf where they instruct to disable color management for the print space in PS and let the printer driver handle it. Most of the blues and greens looked nice, and the red shirt seemed to retain an acceptable level of color - but my son's face (skin tone) was overly red - not natural. Adjusting to fix the redness in the face results in losing the redness in the shirt I would suggest switching to a Canon paper, and using the Canon Profile for that paper in the Printer. Again I have to ask, which Ink is in the Printer, Canon Printer Profiles will assume Canon Ink. I do not use a Canon Printer, so I am not sure how to turn of the Colour Management in your Printer, or how to specify which Profile the Printer should use. I believe these tasks are a bit more complicated than they are in Epson Printers. The basic workflow is. Open the Image in PS. If the Tagged profile is different from your Working Space, PS will ask to Convert it. When you go to Print with Preview, in C. Management, you will see a box specifying the "Source Profile", this should be your Working Space, Adobe RGB. Below that is a box for the "Output", this is where you specify the Printer / Paper Profile. Once this is done you then get into the Printer Driver, and go through the process of completely turning off its Colour Management. The alternative is to choose in PS Output, "Management by Printer", and then choose the correct Profile in the Printer Driver, and let the Printer do the management. It is important that only one of PS or the Printer uses the Printer Profile, double Profiling guarantees wrong colour. I would suggest that you have a read at some of the specialised sites such as www.computer-darkroom.com or some of the others which will be suggested very soon. It is difficult, but if I can do it then so can anyone. Roy G I think i have a handle on making sure that either the printer or PS does color management (not both). I've tried various settings, various adjustments - still haven't gotten it. I did find this thread on dpreview.com which seems to represent the problem I am trying to work through: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13085507 I think it is good that what I see on the monitor is pretty darn close to what comes out of the printer - I suppose that's exactly how it is supposed to work! What I don't understand is why when I shift (either by doing profile-assign or view-proof colors) from Adobe RGB to each of the different canon profiles, there seems to be a significant color shift, almost like a "haze" over the image. No matter what adjustments I try, I can't seem to get "canon proof" to come close to the Adobe RGB version. If I do most of my adjustments in Raw Shooters Esentials, then convert to Adobe RGB and open in PS - things seem just fine. It's when I go to the canon profiles (even when specifying that in RSE) that I seem to be losing the "crispness, vividness, impact" of the colors that I can't seem to get back. argh! Thanks again to all those who responded. I'll be reviewing the comments again with a fresh mind (and some daylight coming through the window) in the morning. Any other suggestions/thoughts - please keep them coming! - andy |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:01:16 -0700, magicrat wrote"
Thanks again to all those who responded. I'll be reviewing the comments again with a fresh mind (and some daylight coming through the window) in the morning. Any other suggestions/thoughts - please keep them coming! Try printing a reference image, like the photodisc test image. You need to break the problem down to see if it's a monitor-profile issue or a printer-profile issue. It shouldn't be that hard. Has the printer *ever* given good colors -- or are you having problems with just this one image? rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
I'm going to guess you haven't enough memory allocated to photoshop. If this
is the case you'll need to add more memory, free up more memory, or reboot after making significant changes, otherwise it is possible the changes you make will be behind by two prints or more or not at all. mark_ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question about Printing, Color Spaces, Photoshop
"magicrat" wrote in message
... Hi again. You mention that your Monitor is showing pretty much the colours you are getting out of the Printer. That probably indicates that you are getting your Colour Management working, but it should really only be similar when you are using View - Proof. When you go to View - Proof, and use a Canon Printer Profile, you say the colours change. From your description I would say that you are getting an accurate view of what the printer will produce. Duller& slightly greyish. The difference between your normal Edit View and the Proof View is due largely to the fact that a Print is viewed by Reflected light. Proof View is attempting to replicate that effect while also limiting colours to the actual Colour Gamut of your Printer's Inks, and the surface colour of the Paper. This is very much what Proof is for, to show an approximation of what a Print will look like using that Printer and its Profile. Have you checked that the Canon Printer Profile you are using to print with is specific to your Printer Model, and the Paper in it. In XP go to Windows \ System 32 \ Spool \ Driver \ Colour, R. Click on the Profile, then on Properties and on the Profile Information Tab, you should see what Paper and Printer it is specified for. The only other part of your workflow that is dubious seems to be the opening of your image in PS, you should be "Assigning sRGB" and ticking the box to "Convert to Working Space", if it is coming in without a tagged profile. Or it might be worthwhile, meantime, to work in sRGB, so that you will prevent yourself from making any Assigning or Converting errors, until you have really got the hang of it all. There is a fairly simple workflow instruction with screen shots on the "Notices and Info" pages of my Camera Club website, www.ayrphoto.co.uk. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie question Photoshop...skin tone adjustment | baker1 | Digital Photography | 1 | January 7th 06 07:01 AM |
Photoshop Elements question | swingman | Digital Photography | 3 | January 6th 06 02:19 AM |
Printing from local stores (was, Printing from RiteAid, a question) | TheMage | Digital Photography | 0 | June 25th 04 08:22 PM |
Stopping Down Enlarger Lens Focus Question Newbie | SofaKing | In The Darkroom | 18 | April 19th 04 12:03 AM |
Newbie-- (WET!) Color printing aid question...Which is best? | Jos. Burke | In The Darkroom | 5 | January 25th 04 09:54 PM |