A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 21st 13, 06:54 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!

On 21/02/2013 05:31, RichA wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/02...ow-pass-filter


As has been discussed many times already here, once the sensor
resolution exceeds that of the lens (in broad terms), there is less need
for a strong anti-alias filter.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
  #2  
Old February 21st 13, 09:09 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default I knew it, I KNEW IT! New D7100 24mp NO AA filter!!!

On 21/02/2013 7:54 p.m., David Taylor wrote:
On 21/02/2013 05:31, RichA wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/02...ow-pass-filter


As has been discussed many times already here, once the sensor
resolution exceeds that of the lens (in broad terms), there is less need
for a strong anti-alias filter.

I wonder whether this D7100 has the same system as the D800E, retaining
a two layer low-pass filter, one layer "cancelling-out" the effect of
the other (sorry for weird explanation, but IIRC that's more-or-less how
Nikon described it), or if it's got none at all?
As described by Nikon, the D800E apparently needed that system to
maintain the same optical path as the D800. There's no "ordinary" D7100
with AA filter.
Some discussion and argument in the DPReview forums as to whether the
D7100 means there will be no "D400". A couple of things suggest that
there is room for a D400 - the D7100 frame rate is not faster than the
6YO D300, the buffer is smaller (only 6 raw frames), and the "kit"
includes the relatively low-end 18-105 zoom.
OTOH, Nikon's usual trick was to release the expensive model first, then
release a version with a few features removed and a lower price six
months down the track. (ie D200 then D80, D300 then D90).

Anyway, the D7100 looks very interesting. The 51 point AF system on DX
as per the D300 gives excellent frame-coverage - not all bunched-up like
on FX models. The price is good IMO ($1200 for body). 24mp on Dx seems
like a lot - it will be interesting to see samples.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony's design for the 24mp APS Rich[_6_] Digital SLR Cameras 32 December 26th 11 05:53 PM
Sony's design for the 24mp APS Rich[_6_] Digital Photography 1 December 14th 11 06:27 AM
12mp vs 24mp - so what? missfocus Digital Photography 80 September 21st 08 07:49 PM
12mp vs 24mp - so what? missfocus Digital SLR Cameras 52 September 15th 08 07:35 PM
Which are the good cameras? Ed Romney knew! Bret Ludwig 35mm Photo Equipment 3 April 19th 06 01:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.