If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#711
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom vs. Apertu Curves
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:52:15 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: "The NSImage class itself is capable of managing image data in a variety of formats. The specific list of formats is dependent on the version of the operating system but includes many standard formats such as TIFF, JPEG, GIF, PNG, and PDF among others. Each format is managed by a specific type of image representation object, whose job is to manage the actual image data." NSImage uses an NSImageRep object to actually read the image data. There is one for each supported image format. Does this apply to reading raw files? At this point you could have said "Yes". it'll read raw directly, with a default conversion. It will read all raws directly? anything included in apple's raw support, which is all it can do, obviously. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#712
|
|||
|
|||
Virtual Copies
In article ,
Eric Stevens wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:51:24 -0400, "PAS" wrote: "nospam" wrote in message .. . In article , PAS wrote: Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response? Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies? that's how. There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode. It's not comparable. Unicode is a character set, and UUencode is a binary to text encoding method. I never claimed they are compatible. I said there is no setting for Unicode, it's Uuencode. That is still the case. no it isn't the case at all. they are two entirely different things. You like to argue for the sake of it, don't you (I know, that's a silly qustion to ask you)? When did I ever say Unicode and Uuencode are the same? I said that OE does not have a setting for Unicode, it has a setting for Uuencode. This is not hard to understand, at least for some of us. obviously you don't understand much of anything. when you say it doesn't have a setting for unicode but does for uuencode, you are confusing the two. it's like saying photoshop elements has no setting for cmyk but has gaussian blur. outlook does not have unicode. it's broken. whether it handles uuencoding or not makes no difference whatsoever, and uuencoding isn't even used anymore. Plonk! I don't know why you should 'plonk' him. In most of your replies on this subject you do seem to mention uuencode when unicode is mentioned. This gave the impression that you thought the two were related. "PAS" plonking nospam? It's his own loss... :-p -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#713
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom vs. Apertu Curves
In article , Eric Stevens wrote:
"The NSImage class itself is capable of managing image data in a variety of formats. The specific list of formats is dependent on the version of the operating system but includes many standard formats such as TIFF, JPEG, GIF, PNG, and PDF among others. Each format is managed by a specific type of image representation object, whose job is to manage the actual image data." NSImage uses an NSImageRep object to actually read the image data. There is one for each supported image format. Eric Stevens: Does this apply to reading raw files? nospam: it'll read raw directly, with a default conversion. It will read all raws directly? All ~300 supported cameras, yes. -- Sandman[.net] |
#714
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom vs. Apertu Curves
In article 2014082115173465607-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote:
Eric Stevens: Does this apply to reading raw files? nospam: it'll read raw directly, with a default conversion. Eric Stevens: It will read all raws directly? nospam: anything included in apple's raw support, which is all it can do, obviously. Yup! For example, here is an NEF opened in Apple's Preview, and it looks just fine. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_876.jpg However if I try to edit that NEF I will get this message: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_877.jpg Preview will let you view RAW files, but it isn't a RAW convertor. Uh, why do you say that? It has already converted that NEF file into a RGB bitmap for you. It's just saying that for your edits to be saved, it needs to save it as another format. That's RAW conversion... -- Sandman[.net] |
#715
|
|||
|
|||
Virtual Copies
In article , PAS wrote:
Savageduck: Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response? Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies? nospam: that's how. PAS: There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode. Sandman: It's not comparable. Unicode is a character set, and UUencode is a binary to text encoding method. I never claimed they are compatible. I said there is no setting for Unicode, it's Uuencode. That is still the case. Right, but I got the impression that you said it like one would say "The word document isn't in English, it's in .zip". -- Sandman[.net] |
#716
|
|||
|
|||
Virtual Copies
In article , J. Clarke wrote:
PAS: I never claimed they are compatible. I said there is no setting for Unicode, it's Uuencode. That is still the case. nospam: no it isn't the case at all. they are two entirely different things. PAS: You like to argue for the sake of it, don't you (I know, that's a silly qustion to ask you)? When did I ever say Unicode and Uuencode are the same? I said that OE does not have a setting for Unicode, it has a setting for Uuencode. This is not hard to understand, at least for some of us. The problem is that you gave too much information to someone who can't figure out what to do with it. "OE doesn't have a setting for Unicode" was enough. Adding the note that it has "uuencode" simply confused poor nospam. No confusion here. But the comment is akin to saying "OE doesn't support Unicode, but it can print to my laserjet printer". Unicode support and laserjet printing has no relation to each other and I got the idea that PAS thought they were comparable as if he thought that UUencode was a character set. He has since told me he didn't think that so there is no problem. I just wanted to correct a possible confusion. -- Sandman[.net] |
#717
|
|||
|
|||
Virtual Copies
In article , PAS wrote:
PAS: Plonk! Eric Stevens: I don't know why you should 'plonk' him. In most of your replies on this subject you do seem to mention uuencode when unicode is mentioned. This gave the impression that you thought the two were related. I was asked about using Unicode, so I replied. I didn't bring it up, I was questioned as to whether I was using it. I responded that OE does not have a setting to use Unicode, it has a setting to use Uuencode. How is that giving the impression of comparing the two? Surely you can see that this is a possible interpretation? "It doesn't support Unicode, it's Latin 1" This is you saying that it doesn't support one character set, and that it does support another character set. "It doesn't support Unicode, it supports a bluetooth keyboard" This is you saying that it doesn't support one character set, and then mentioning - in relation to that - something positively not related to it. "It doesn't support Unicode, it's UUencode" Same here. But given the similarity in naming, the reader could easily be led to the impression that you think they are related. That you are listing what it does and doesn't support in relation to the question you were given, and that it's rather logical to not assume that you were knowingly posting something totally unrelated to the question. -- Sandman[.net] |
#718
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom vs. Apertu Curves
On 22 Aug 2014 05:49:41 GMT, Sandman wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens wrote: "The NSImage class itself is capable of managing image data in a variety of formats. The specific list of formats is dependent on the version of the operating system but includes many standard formats such as TIFF, JPEG, GIF, PNG, and PDF among others. Each format is managed by a specific type of image representation object, whose job is to manage the actual image data." NSImage uses an NSImageRep object to actually read the image data. There is one for each supported image format. Eric Stevens: Does this apply to reading raw files? nospam: it'll read raw directly, with a default conversion. It will read all raws directly? All ~300 supported cameras, yes. I had already understood that from what you had written. nospam had slightly confused the situation by writing: "it'll read raw directly, with a default conversion. there's nothing like it on any other platform." I wasn't quite sure what he meant by a 'default conversion'. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#719
|
|||
|
|||
Virtual Copies
"nospam" wrote in message
... In article 2014082114182137296-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: I don't know why you should 'plonk' him. In most of your replies on this subject you do seem to mention uuencode when unicode is mentioned. This gave the impression that you thought the two were related. I started this when I asked: "Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response? Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?" ...and it went downhill from there when *PAS* responded to me: "There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode." yep. he confused the two. Nope. |
#720
|
|||
|
|||
Virtual Copies
"android" wrote in message
... In article , Eric Stevens wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:51:24 -0400, "PAS" wrote: "nospam" wrote in message .. . In article , PAS wrote: Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response? Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies? that's how. There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode. It's not comparable. Unicode is a character set, and UUencode is a binary to text encoding method. I never claimed they are compatible. I said there is no setting for Unicode, it's Uuencode. That is still the case. no it isn't the case at all. they are two entirely different things. You like to argue for the sake of it, don't you (I know, that's a silly qustion to ask you)? When did I ever say Unicode and Uuencode are the same? I said that OE does not have a setting for Unicode, it has a setting for Uuencode. This is not hard to understand, at least for some of us. obviously you don't understand much of anything. when you say it doesn't have a setting for unicode but does for uuencode, you are confusing the two. it's like saying photoshop elements has no setting for cmyk but has gaussian blur. outlook does not have unicode. it's broken. whether it handles uuencoding or not makes no difference whatsoever, and uuencoding isn't even used anymore. Plonk! I don't know why you should 'plonk' him. In most of your replies on this subject you do seem to mention uuencode when unicode is mentioned. This gave the impression that you thought the two were related. "PAS" plonking nospam? It's his own loss... :-p -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography I'm already regretting it |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lightroom and Aperture, shared library? | Sandman | Digital Photography | 15 | May 15th 14 05:09 PM |
PhotoShop Elements, Aperture and Lightroom | nospam | Digital Photography | 0 | May 23rd 08 10:09 PM |
PhotoShop Elements, Aperture and Lightroom | C J Campbell | Digital Photography | 1 | May 23rd 08 10:08 PM |
Aperture, Lightroom: beyond Bridge; who needs them? | Frank ess | Digital Photography | 0 | June 4th 07 06:42 PM |
Lightzone/Lightroom/Aperture | D.M. Procida | Digital SLR Cameras | 20 | April 27th 07 07:00 AM |