Sigma 12-24 vs Canon 10-22

Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

Bill Hilton wrote:

Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

Really almost unbelievable that the Sigma could be that bad. Did he get
a lemon?

Phil

Bill Hilton wrote:

Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

Really almost unbelievable that the Sigma could be that bad. Did he get
a lemon?

Phil

From: Phil Wheeler

Really almost unbelievable that the Sigma could be that bad. Did he get
a lemon?

He asks this same question in the "Update" at the bottom of the page, after
Sigma owners wrote in suggesting it was a problem with Sigma's quality control
....

From: Phil Wheeler

Really almost unbelievable that the Sigma could be that bad. Did he get
a lemon?

He asks this same question in the "Update" at the bottom of the page, after
Sigma owners wrote in suggesting it was a problem with Sigma's quality control
....

From: Phil Wheeler

Really almost unbelievable that the Sigma could be that bad. Did he get
a lemon?

He asks this same question in the "Update" at the bottom of the page, after
Sigma owners wrote in suggesting it was a problem with Sigma's quality control
....

While I'm sure the Canon is significantly better than the Sigma, The
Landscaper has a tendency to fudge his tests to make a point. I'd look to a
serious reviewer before trusting anything on his site.

--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html

"Bill Hilton" wrote in message
...
Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side
comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

While I'm sure the Canon is significantly better than the Sigma, The
Landscaper has a tendency to fudge his tests to make a point. I'd look to a
serious reviewer before trusting anything on his site.

--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html

"Bill Hilton" wrote in message
...
Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side
comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

"Bill Hilton" wrote in message
...
Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side
comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

Bill, thanks for posting this as I am thinking about buying such a lens. I
find it hard to believe that the Sigma is that bad. I read the whole page
(including the quality control issue) and still find it puzzling. I'd
rather get the Sigma because I am worried about EF-S lenses rapidly
decreasing in value in the future (say two years). I now own one Sigma lens
and like it.

"Bill Hilton" wrote in message
...
Check this link and scroll down a couple of pages to a side-by-side
comparison
of these two lenses at f/8 ... amazing ...

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...2mm-test.shtml

Bill, thanks for posting this as I am thinking about buying such a lens. I
find it hard to believe that the Sigma is that bad. I read the whole page
(including the quality control issue) and still find it puzzling. I'd
rather get the Sigma because I am worried about EF-S lenses rapidly
decreasing in value in the future (say two years). I now own one Sigma lens
and like it.