If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
On 2018-03-15 13:07:30 +0000, nospam said:
In article , Whisky-dave wrote: I've copied slides or rather tried to using a few methods and I know that if using daylight you still have to use your brain too. a brain is always needed. Have you considered to electronically enhance yours? "Hello sir. don't be afraid of this technology. It's something good, there are very bad people in this world who commit murder, raped, steal and do many inmoral things that affect our human lives. I have been in contact with them for a while now and they use me in ways I can't say because it's "classified". I was instructed to tell you right now as I have been writing, that you are doing a great job informing the public about this amazing technology, but also that you or no one else should be" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzgYDe8TwDo -- teleportation kills |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
On 2018-03-15 15:23:38 +0000, nospam said:
In article , Whisky-dave wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. No one said that but that is not a MO that gives you a predictable result. -- teleportation kills |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
In article , android
wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. No one said that yes they did. but that is not a MO that gives you a predictable result. it's very predictable when done properly. just because you (and others) have no clue doesn't make it impossible. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
On 2018-03-15 15:13, nospam wrote:
In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: Contrary to nospam claims, the sun light varies a lot and affects results. i never said it didn't. you are intentionally lying about what i said. You can compensate, take it into account. something which is needed for *every* single photo. it's also very easy to do. Finally! You recognize that compensation is needed. i never said otherwise. stop lying. Oh, you certainly did. Stop trolling. -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
On 2018-03-15 18:36, nospam wrote:
In article , android wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. No one said that yes they did. No, we did not. but that is not a MO that gives you a predictable result. it's very predictable when done properly. just because you (and others) have no clue doesn't make it impossible. That *you* say something is sufficient to know that it is not true :-P -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote: Contrary to nospam claims, the sun light varies a lot and affects results. i never said it didn't. you are intentionally lying about what i said. You can compensate, take it into account. something which is needed for *every* single photo. it's also very easy to do. Finally! You recognize that compensation is needed. i never said otherwise. stop lying. Oh, you certainly did. i did not say any such thing. stop lying. Stop trolling. if anyone needs to stop trolling, it would be you. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. No one said that yes they did. No, we did not. actually, you were among the first to do so. but that is not a MO that gives you a predictable result. it's very predictable when done properly. just because you (and others) have no clue doesn't make it impossible. That *you* say something is sufficient to know that it is not true :-P if you think what i said wrong, then it should be easy for you to prove it. simply saying it's wrong is insufficient. you can't (because it's not wrong), which is why you resort to ad hominem attacks and lying about what i said. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:38:19 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. No one said that yes they did. No, we did not. actually, you were among the first to do so. but that is not a MO that gives you a predictable result. it's very predictable when done properly. just because you (and others) have no clue doesn't make it impossible. That *you* say something is sufficient to know that it is not true :-P if you think what i said wrong, then it should be easy for you to prove it. simply saying it's wrong is insufficient. you can't (because it's not wrong), which is why you resort to ad hominem attacks and lying about what i said. You are lying about what you said and lying about what you didn't say. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning negatives
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I've used flash too but the closest I've come to a resonable result was using an overcast sky in London was the easist. imagine that. these other clucks say it can't be done. No one said that yes they did. No, we did not. actually, you were among the first to do so. but that is not a MO that gives you a predictable result. it's very predictable when done properly. just because you (and others) have no clue doesn't make it impossible. That *you* say something is sufficient to know that it is not true :-P if you think what i said wrong, then it should be easy for you to prove it. simply saying it's wrong is insufficient. you can't (because it's not wrong), which is why you resort to ad hominem attacks and lying about what i said. You are lying about what you said and lying about what you didn't say. nope. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
scanning old negatives | Phillip Helbig[_2_] | Digital Photography | 23 | May 29th 15 06:49 AM |
Scanning old negatives | Stuart | Digital Photography | 17 | April 20th 07 05:53 AM |
Help scanning negatives, please! | iamcanadian | 35mm Photo Equipment | 12 | December 3rd 06 02:32 AM |
scanning negatives | Mike - EMAIL IGNORED | 35mm Photo Equipment | 12 | November 27th 04 07:31 AM |
Lab for Scanning Negatives..... | ron | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | October 14th 04 05:30 PM |