OT I won

On 18/07/2016 02:29, PeterN wrote:
[]
This is really interesting.
in the immediately preceding post you agree with that statement. Yet in
this one you don't.

From the referenced post:
(In article , Ken Hart
wrote:



Ken Hart:
"Not all phone companies offer the same products, services, and prices."

nospam: "correct"

Peter, we know that poster is always correct (ahem), so why not do us
all a favour and not repeat that s/he says? Even better, use the killfile!

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

In article , Floyd L. Davidson
wrote:

the not correct part is:
Some areas do not have a choice in phone services.

every area has a choice.

That is an absurd statement. Totally clueless.

wrong.

Just a hint... there are some areas that do not even have
any phone services,

then they won't be getting any spam calls that they need to block, will
they?

you're arguing just to argue.

much less a choice of providers or
services. Others have one provider and limite choice of
services. Some may even have multiple providers and still
have limited choice of services

everyone has a choice of providers, and with number portability, they
can keep their number when switching providers.

however, i'm sure you can find a lone exception somewhere, just to
argue.

nospam wrote:
In article , Floyd L. Davidson
wrote:

the not correct part is:
Some areas do not have a choice in phone services.

every area has a choice.

That is an absurd statement. Totally clueless.

wrong.

Just a hint... there are some areas that do not even have
any phone services,

then they won't be getting any spam calls that they need to block, will
they?

you're arguing just to argue.

much less a choice of providers or
services. Others have one provider and limite choice of
services. Some may even have multiple providers and still
have limited choice of services

everyone has a choice of providers, and with number portability, they
can keep their number when switching providers.

however, i'm sure you can find a lone exception somewhere, just to
argue.

Squirm all you like with weasel words... what you said was simply
untrue.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

In article , Floyd L. Davidson
wrote:

the not correct part is:
Some areas do not have a choice in phone services.

every area has a choice.

That is an absurd statement. Totally clueless.

wrong.

Just a hint... there are some areas that do not even have
any phone services,

then they won't be getting any spam calls that they need to block, will
they?

you're arguing just to argue.

much less a choice of providers or
services. Others have one provider and limite choice of
services. Some may even have multiple providers and still
have limited choice of services

everyone has a choice of providers, and with number portability, they
can keep their number when switching providers.

however, i'm sure you can find a lone exception somewhere, just to
argue.

Squirm all you like with weasel words... what you said was simply
untrue.

it was and still is completely true.

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article , Floyd L. Davidson
wrote:

the not correct part is:
Some areas do not have a choice in phone services.

every area has a choice.

That is an absurd statement. Totally clueless.

wrong.

Just a hint... there are some areas that do not even have
any phone services,

then they won't be getting any spam calls that they need to block, will
they?

you're arguing just to argue.

much less a choice of providers or
services. Others have one provider and limite choice of
services. Some may even have multiple providers and still
have limited choice of services

everyone has a choice of providers, and with number portability, they
can keep their number when switching providers.

however, i'm sure you can find a lone exception somewhere, just to
argue.

Squirm all you like with weasel words... what you said was simply
untrue.

it was and still is completely true.

oki...
--
teleportation kills