If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
Bruce wrote in
I didn't think the Pentax 40mm f/2.8 was all that great. I have no idea what will happen to the Nikon or (especially) the Q Pentax. If Ricoh has any sense, the Pentax Q will be quietly forgotten. I don't know what the copier company is going to do, but I will be sad the day they cancel the 645, a truly great camera. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
On 9/23/2011 10:34 PM, Rich wrote:
I don't know what the copier company is going to do, but I will be sad the day they cancel the 645, a truly great camera. I guess you were sad in 1997, since that's when the 645 was discontinued. -- Mike Benveniste -- (Clarification Required) You don't have to sort of enhance reality. There is nothing stranger than truth. -- Annie Leibovitz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
In article , Mike Benveniste
wrote: I don't know what the copier company is going to do, but I will be sad the day they cancel the 645, a truly great camera. I guess you were sad in 1997, since that's when the 645 was discontinued. it's obvious that he means the *current* 645d. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
Mike Benveniste wrote in
: On 9/23/2011 10:34 PM, Rich wrote: I don't know what the copier company is going to do, but I will be sad the day they cancel the 645, a truly great camera. I guess you were sad in 1997, since that's when the 645 was discontinued. This isn't a film group. They came out with a digital. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
On 9/24/2011 11:10 PM, Rich wrote:
This isn't a film group. They came out with a digital. Which is called the 645D, not the 645. Have you ever even touched one, or are you relying on hearsay? I don't recall seeing any sample shots from you with it. If you had, I would have expected you to write a post complaining about the use of plastics in the $1500 55mm f/2.8 normal lens, one of exactly two lenses Pentax currently sells for the camera. -- Mike Benveniste -- (Clarification Required) You don't have to sort of enhance reality. There is nothing stranger than truth. -- Annie Leibovitz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
"Rich" wrote in message
... [] This isn't a film group. They came out with a digital. This appear to be two groups, as per a normal Rich cross posting. rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital As the Nikons are not DSLR, no need to post to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, so follow-ups set. Next time, choose just one group, Rich. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
Mike Benveniste wrote in news:9e7o27Fd2gU1
@mid.individual.net: On 9/24/2011 11:10 PM, Rich wrote: This isn't a film group. They came out with a digital. Which is called the 645D, not the 645. Have you ever even touched one, or are you relying on hearsay? I don't recall seeing any sample shots from you with it. If you had, I would have expected you to write a post complaining about the use of plastics in the $1500 55mm f/2.8 normal lens, one of exactly two lenses Pentax currently sells for the camera. I've used it and have posted about what a great camera it is. I said it before, it is one of the most beautifully balanced cameras I've ever used. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
"David J Taylor" wrote in
: "Rich" wrote in message ... [] This isn't a film group. They came out with a digital. This appear to be two groups, as per a normal Rich cross posting. rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital As the Nikons are not DSLR, no need to post to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, so follow-ups set. Next time, choose just one group, Rich. If you don't deal with mirrorless cameras as replacements for DSLRs in that group, all you'll have there are Indian spammers trying to hawk girlie pictures or havest your personal data. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
On 9/25/2011 10:19 PM, Rich wrote:
I've used it and have posted about what a great camera it is. I said it before, it is one of the most beautifully balanced cameras I've ever used. Uh huh. So we should assume you got exactly zero shots with it worth posting? -- Mike Benveniste -- (Clarification Required) You don't have to sort of enhance reality. There is nothing stranger than truth. -- Annie Leibovitz |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality
On 2011-09-25 19:20:21 -0700, Rich said:
"David J Taylor" wrote in : "Rich" wrote in message ... [] This isn't a film group. They came out with a digital. This appear to be two groups, as per a normal Rich cross posting. rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital As the Nikons are not DSLR, no need to post to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, so follow-ups set. Next time, choose just one group, Rich. If you don't deal with mirrorless cameras as replacements for DSLRs in that group, all you'll have there are Indian spammers trying to hawk girlie pictures or havest your personal data. You need some better filters then. -- Regards, Savageduck |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality | David Ruether[_4_] | Digital Photography | 15 | September 28th 11 08:28 PM |
Initial images from new Nikons = P&S quality | David Ruether[_4_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 15 | September 28th 11 08:28 PM |