If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
In article , PAS wrote:
Most home users aren't using "premium" systems and, furthermore, the numbers never take into account the who-knows-how-many thousands and thousands of people who build their own premium PCs and they run Windows. laptops have greatly outsold desktops for well over a decade and nobody builds their own laptops. that leaves desktops, and nearly all of those are prebuilt. those who build their own is a tiny segment and shrinking. LOL. You are good for a laugh. Sales for 2016: Lenovo 21.3%, HP 20.9%, Dell 15.7%, Asus 7.1%, Apple 7.1%, all others 27.7% https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/23/mac-s...-year-as-lenov o-dell-and-others-gained-ground/ Explain how that equates to the majority of users choosing a Mac over a Windows PC. those numbers are overall sales, not retail sales where people have a choice in what they're buying. it includes corporate which often require a windows box on someone's desk. the user doesn't have a choice, other than to get a new job. in companies where people *can* choose, such as ibm (link in previous post), people are choosing macs in significant numbers (73% at ibm) *and* saving money in the process (as much as $543 per mac). those windows sales numbers also include non-desktop systems, such as atms, traffic lights, etc., which completely skews things. nobody buys a mac to be used as a traffic light. if you look at *just* desktop systems (which includes laptops), the numbers paint a very different story. also, market share numbers assume each customer is the same. they aren't. and by *your* numbers, home-built computers are less than 7%, lumped in with others. lastly, apple isn't chasing market share. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
On 6/20/2017 3:15 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PAS wrote: Most home users aren't using "premium" systems and, furthermore, the numbers never take into account the who-knows-how-many thousands and thousands of people who build their own premium PCs and they run Windows. laptops have greatly outsold desktops for well over a decade and nobody builds their own laptops. that leaves desktops, and nearly all of those are prebuilt. those who build their own is a tiny segment and shrinking. LOL. You are good for a laugh. Sales for 2016: Lenovo 21.3%, HP 20.9%, Dell 15.7%, Asus 7.1%, Apple 7.1%, all others 27.7% https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/23/mac-s...-year-as-lenov o-dell-and-others-gained-ground/ Explain how that equates to the majority of users choosing a Mac over a Windows PC. those numbers are overall sales, not retail sales where people have a choice in what they're buying. Take out corporate sales and the numbers are still overwhelmingly in favor of Windows PCs and you know that. it includes corporate which often require a windows box on someone's desk. the user doesn't have a choice, other than to get a new job. in companies where people *can* choose, such as ibm (link in previous post), people are choosing macs in significant numbers (73% at ibm) *and* saving money in the process (as much as $543 per mac). those windows sales numbers also include non-desktop systems, such as atms, traffic lights, etc., which completely skews things. nobody buys a mac to be used as a traffic light. if you look at *just* desktop systems (which includes laptops), the numbers paint a very different story. Where in that article does it state that the figures are for any devices other than a laptop or desktop? I'll answer that - nowhere. Next... also, market share numbers assume each customer is the same. they aren't. and by *your* numbers, home-built computers are less than 7%, lumped in with others. How do you deduce a figure of "less than 7%" form a sales amount of 27.7% for "Others"? Is that new, new math? lastly, apple isn't chasing market share. For the purposes of this discussion, who cares? You're trying to move the goalpost again. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
In article , PAS wrote:
Explain how that equates to the majority of users choosing a Mac over a Windows PC. those numbers are overall sales, not retail sales where people have a choice in what they're buying. Take out corporate sales and the numbers are still overwhelmingly in favor of Windows PCs and you know that. they aren't. look around. there are ****loads of macs. it includes corporate which often require a windows box on someone's desk. the user doesn't have a choice, other than to get a new job. in companies where people *can* choose, such as ibm (link in previous post), people are choosing macs in significant numbers (73% at ibm) *and* saving money in the process (as much as $543 per mac). those windows sales numbers also include non-desktop systems, such as atms, traffic lights, etc., which completely skews things. nobody buys a mac to be used as a traffic light. if you look at *just* desktop systems (which includes laptops), the numbers paint a very different story. Where in that article does it state that the figures are for any devices other than a laptop or desktop? I'll answer that - nowhere. Next... unless otherwise specified, market share numbers include *all* windows systems, not just what ends up on a desk. that's why they're so misleading. also, market share numbers assume each customer is the same. they aren't. and by *your* numbers, home-built computers are less than 7%, lumped in with others. How do you deduce a figure of "less than 7%" form a sales amount of 27.7% for "Others"? Is that new, new math? because what comes after apple at 7% is 'other'. if home-built was 7%, it would have eclipsed apple. lastly, apple isn't chasing market share. For the purposes of this discussion, who cares? you obviously do. You're trying to move the goalpost again. nope. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
On 6/20/2017 4:04 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PAS wrote: Explain how that equates to the majority of users choosing a Mac over a Windows PC. those numbers are overall sales, not retail sales where people have a choice in what they're buying. Take out corporate sales and the numbers are still overwhelmingly in favor of Windows PCs and you know that. they aren't. look around. there are ****loads of macs. it includes corporate which often require a windows box on someone's desk. the user doesn't have a choice, other than to get a new job. in companies where people *can* choose, such as ibm (link in previous post), people are choosing macs in significant numbers (73% at ibm) *and* saving money in the process (as much as $543 per mac). those windows sales numbers also include non-desktop systems, such as atms, traffic lights, etc., which completely skews things. nobody buys a mac to be used as a traffic light. if you look at *just* desktop systems (which includes laptops), the numbers paint a very different story. Where in that article does it state that the figures are for any devices other than a laptop or desktop? I'll answer that - nowhere. Next... unless otherwise specified, market share numbers include *all* windows systems, not just what ends up on a desk. that's why they're so misleading. Nice attempt at spin but you failed. You can read, can't you? Note the chart where it reads "Personal Computer Market Share via Bloomberg Intelligence". Those stats are for PC sales, not other devices. A POS system is not a PC. also, market share numbers assume each customer is the same. they aren't. and by *your* numbers, home-built computers are less than 7%, lumped in with others. How do you deduce a figure of "less than 7%" form a sales amount of 27.7% for "Others"? Is that new, new math? because what comes after apple at 7% is 'other'. if home-built was 7%, it would have eclipsed apple. lastly, apple isn't chasing market share. For the purposes of this discussion, who cares? you obviously do. You're trying to move the goalpost again. nope. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
On Jun 20, 2017, nospam wrote
(in ) : In , wrote: Snip Take out corporate sales and the numbers are still overwhelmingly in favor of Windows PCs and you know that. they aren't. look around. there are ****loads of macs. Why not just take a poll among the usual suspects in this room? As best I can recall the Mac users here are Alan Browne, Davoud, David B., Sandman, Whisky-Dave, you, and me. That is 7 confirmed, there might be a few more. Confirmed Windows users are Eric, PeterN, Tony Cooper, PAS, Mayayana, Bill W, Noons, David Taylor, and probably at least 5 more for around 13. Then there is Floyd who has no time for Windows, or MacOS, along with the other Linux devotees. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
In article , PAS wrote:
those windows sales numbers also include non-desktop systems, such as atms, traffic lights, etc., which completely skews things. nobody buys a mac to be used as a traffic light. if you look at *just* desktop systems (which includes laptops), the numbers paint a very different story. Where in that article does it state that the figures are for any devices other than a laptop or desktop? I'll answer that - nowhere. Next... unless otherwise specified, market share numbers include *all* windows systems, not just what ends up on a desk. that's why they're so misleading. Nice attempt at spin but you failed. You can read, can't you? Note the chart where it reads "Personal Computer Market Share via Bloomberg Intelligence". Those stats are for PC sales, not other devices. A POS system is not a PC. it gets counted, regardless of what it ends up being used for. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: Take out corporate sales and the numbers are still overwhelmingly in favor of Windows PCs and you know that. they aren't. look around. there are ****loads of macs. Why not just take a poll among the usual suspects in this room? As best I can recall the Mac users here are Alan Browne, Davoud, David B., Sandman, Whisky-Dave, you, and me. That is 7 confirmed, there might be a few more. Confirmed Windows users are Eric, PeterN, Tony Cooper, PAS, Mayayana, Bill W, Noons, David Taylor, and probably at least 5 more for around 13. Then there is Floyd who has no time for Windows, or MacOS, along with the other Linux devotees. you're assuming each person has only one computer. not a good assumption. if you're counting unit sales, you would need to count how many computers each person has and what it's running, because a mac can run macos, windows and/or linux, either the entire os or just the apps. some people even buy macs to run windows and never boot macos. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
On Jun 20, 2017, nospam wrote
(in ) : In iganews.com, Savageduck wrote: Take out corporate sales and the numbers are still overwhelmingly in favor of Windows PCs and you know that. they aren't. look around. there are ****loads of macs. Why not just take a poll among the usual suspects in this room? As best I can recall the Mac users here are Alan Browne, Davoud, David B., Sandman, Whisky-Dave, you, and me. That is 7 confirmed, there might be a few more. Confirmed Windows users are Eric, PeterN, Tony Cooper, PAS, Mayayana, Bill W, Noons, David Taylor, and probably at least 5 more for around 13. Then there is Floyd who has no time for Windows, or MacOS, along with the other Linux devotees. you're assuming each person has only one computer. not a good assumption. True. However, I was trying to keep the count simple. I have 4 desktop Macs and 3 laptops, of which only 1 desktop and 1 laptop are in current use. Then I also have a few iOS devices. Alan Browne and Davoud probably have 10 Macs between them if you're counting unit sales, you would need to count how many computers each person has and what it's running, because a mac can run macos, windows and/or linux, either the entire os or just the apps. some people even buy macs to run windows and never boot macos. I know Alan Browne occasionally runs Windows on his Macs, and I have used VMWare Fusion to access a copy of Win XP, something I haven’t had a desire to do for some 8 years. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: some people even buy macs to run windows and never boot macos. I know Alan Browne occasionally runs Windows on his Macs, and I have used VMWare Fusion to access a copy of Win XP, something I havenąt had a desire to do for some 8 years. even if you had a desire to run xp, don't. just don't. win10, on the other hand, is actually pretty good, although its design language is something a 5th grader could have designed. maybe one did. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Travel without a camera
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:45:35 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article .com, Savageduck wrote: some people even buy macs to run windows and never boot macos. I know Alan Browne occasionally runs Windows on his Macs, and I have used VMWare Fusion to access a copy of Win XP, something I havenąt had a desire to do for some 8 years. even if you had a desire to run xp, don't. just don't. It's okay if you keep it off the network. That's what I do with one laptop for one program I can't replace. No internet access needed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travel Camera | Trundle | Digital Photography | 14 | November 24th 14 08:00 PM |
Ideal travel camera... | AKT | Digital Photography | 5 | November 18th 07 08:11 PM |
Air Travel with LF Camera | Ron Gans | Large Format Photography Equipment | 17 | April 10th 07 10:34 PM |
Need New Travel Camera | rhonda | Digital Photography | 4 | August 4th 06 04:56 PM |
Digital travel camera | [email protected] | Film & Labs | 0 | January 29th 04 05:33 AM |