If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR for "full auto" shooting of kids? or Point-and-shoot?
A terrible thing happened over Christmas. A friend lent me a Canon EOS
400D with the kit lens (I think), after my point and shoot (Canon IXUS 800) died two weeks earlier. We still had our old Fuji F10, but it's cripplingly slow to focus indoors, and very prone to over/under exposing subjects with flash, so pretty useless for taking photos of Christmas day! So, in desperation, we accepted the 400D. The cries of "we'll never be able to use that thing" from both myself and my wife were quickly replaced by us both taking photo after photo - far more than we'd ever taken before (and 250 a day is not unusual around Christmas and birthdays). We loved... * the instant and reliable auto focus * the speed of shooting * the speed of recovery * the long manual zoom range (far further at both ends than we were used to) * the "safe" exposure (most shots were slightly dark but could easily be lightened in software - opposite of the blown highlights we often got with our PnS) * the lack of red eye * the quality of the photos * the narrow depth of field on some shots We hated... * after lots of continuous shooting, the flash suddenly needed a very long time to recover, and became very sluggish * having to look through a view finder - I know that's intrinsic to how almost all DSLRs work, but we really missed the live view on the LCD We also missed the Canon Zoom Browser software, which we use to automatically download the photos from the camera, spin them around, and sort them into dated folders. Windows downloaded the photos, Cpicture automatically spun the around, and I sorted them into folders by hand. The supplied lens maybe wasn't pixel sharp, but it was better than what we were used to. So, my question is, if I'm to take the leap into the world of DSLR, what should I consider? I've looked at the Canon 400D and Nikon D40X on dpreview. These reviews don't seem to focus on what I really care about - they didn't mention the fantastic lack of red eye, or the annoying flash recycle time problem with the 400D for example. How am I to learn about these things before buying the camera? I don't want to make an expensive mistake. I can't imagine wanting to change lenses. The idea of exposing the sensor to dust doesn't appeal anyway! I seem to have enough bad luck with cameras as it is. Alternatively, if there's a point-and-shoot which can match the speed and safe exposure of the 400D, and yet still fit in my pocket and show me everything on an LCD, I'd like to hear about it. I was happy with my IXUS 400, back when I didn't know any better, though the high (!) ISO400 was terribly noisy. I hated my Fuji F10 - great reviews, useless camera for what I want it for. Most recently, I was quite happy with the IXUS 800IS, but it only lasted 3 months. It makes me a little wary of buying Canon in the future. Any helpful advice gratefully received! Cheers, David. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is there a decent point and shoot with image stabilization and a 3" screen for $150.00?. | Ted[_2_] | Digital Photography | 1 | April 2nd 07 07:41 AM |
Canon SD600 terrible for "point and shoot", help me find an alternative!!! | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 8 | February 8th 07 06:42 AM |
ABCNEWS: "FOLEY WON'T BE PROSECUTED" - "KIDS" WERE TOO OLD!! | Meine Ehre heist Treue | Digital Photography | 1 | December 10th 06 05:57 AM |
Auto "Image Sharpening" and "Image Adjustment" with Nikon 5700 | Anthony | Digital Photography | 2 | February 24th 06 10:29 AM |