|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 4th 15, 01:35 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
Something from me at ISO 3200
Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison
Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC -- Regards, Savageduck 
|
|
#2
July 4th 15, 02:09 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:35:13 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC Noise reduction in post? In camera?
|
|
#3
July 4th 15, 02:30 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On 07/03/2015 07:35 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC -- Regards, Savageduck Nice player there. I have a Pathe that plays platters and the head tilts to play both standard records or the Edison type. Not worth posting an image as the door is not original and has probably zero value.
|
|
#4
July 4th 15, 02:48 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On Jul 3, 2015, Bill W wrote
(in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:35:13 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC Noise reduction in post? In camera? All post was done in LR including NR. -- Regards, Savageduck
|
|
#5
July 4th 15, 02:58 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On 7/3/2015 8:35 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC I may be tired after getting up at 5 this morning, but it looks nice to me. Hard to tell it was low light, except for some minor blockiing in the shadows. -- PeterN
|
|
#6
July 4th 15, 03:10 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:48:27 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On Jul 3, 2015, Bill W wrote (in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:35:13 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC Noise reduction in post? In camera? All post was done in LR including NR. It worked - it looks good.
|
|
#7
July 4th 15, 04:32 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:48:27 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On Jul 3, 2015, Bill W wrote (in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:35:13 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC Noise reduction in post? In camera? All post was done in LR including NR. What does LR & NR mean?
|
|
#8
July 4th 15, 04:55 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On Jul 3, 2015, Peter Jason wrote
(in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:48:27 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On Jul 3, 2015, Bill W wrote (in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:35:13 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC Noise reduction in post? In camera? All post was done in LR including NR. What does LR&NR mean? LR = Lightroom, NR= Noise Reduction -- Regards, Savageduck
|
|
#9
July 4th 15, 06:10 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 20:55:07 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On Jul 3, 2015, Peter Jason wrote (in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:48:27 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On Jul 3, 2015, Bill W wrote (in ): On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:35:13 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC Noise reduction in post? In camera? All post was done in LR including NR. What does LR&NR mean? LR = Lightroom, NR= Noise Reduction thanx
|
|
#10
July 5th 15, 09:37 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something from me at ISO 3200
On 04/07/2015 01:35, Savageduck wrote:
Rather than my typical ISO 200-ISO 800 shots, here is a shot of an Edison Amberola at ISO 3200, 1/45 sec and f/4.0 in not so good light. Taken with the X-E2 and XF 35mm f/1.4, no flash. https://db.tt/UxL1pkkC -- Regards, Savageduck Nice. For my "default" setting, in case I need to point and shoot in a hurry, I use Auto ISO with a 6400 limit. It's remarkable how often it works fine. Also, I find myself shooting at perhaps 4x the shutter speeds I would have once used which means it is much rarer to be troubled by target movement or camera shake. (This is with an X-E1).
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The E3 at ISO 3200 | Alfred Molon[_4_] | Digital Photography | 32 | January 20th 08 06:15 AM |
| The E3 at ISO 3200 | Chris[_4_] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 18th 08 12:07 AM |
| 20D and ISO 3200 | Mr. Mark | Digital SLR Cameras | 19 | August 14th 05 05:18 AM |
| ISO 3200? | Patrick L. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 48 | September 23rd 04 02:08 PM |
| ISO 3200 ? | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 7 | September 20th 04 03:55 AM |
Linear Mode
