If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
Stephen Bishop wrote:
On 21 Jan 2009 06:19:33 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On 20 Jan 2009 18:36:46 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On 20 Jan 2009 08:19:02 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:25:10 -0800, Gaston Ryan Coake wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:41:18 -0600, HEMI - Powered wrote: an inviolate document like our Constitution. Your Prez doesn't agree. At a Presidential meeting: "Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this [proposed] law undermine the Constitution." "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a god-damned piece of paper!" Verified and confirmed by three attendees. And you were one of them? How old are you? 13? If I was 13, that would make you, what, 8? LOL! AGAIN with the school-yard retorts. I may have to revise your age downward. Interesting that you started with a schoolyard retort And AGAIN you project your own actions onto others. Sheesh. Typical rightard. No ability to take responsibility for anything that you do. What a lying fool you are! LOL! More of that refual to take responsibility by blaming others for your own actions. YOU were the one with the childish "How old are you? 13?" remark. If you act chldish then you get asked how old you are. Did you really think that asking if he was in the meeting with Bush was anything other than childish stupidity? -- Ray Fischer |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
On 22 Jan 2009 04:20:30 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Stephen Bishop wrote: On 21 Jan 2009 06:19:33 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On 20 Jan 2009 18:36:46 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On 20 Jan 2009 08:19:02 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Stephen Bishop wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:25:10 -0800, Gaston Ryan Coake wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:41:18 -0600, HEMI - Powered wrote: an inviolate document like our Constitution. Your Prez doesn't agree. At a Presidential meeting: "Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this [proposed] law undermine the Constitution." "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a god-damned piece of paper!" Verified and confirmed by three attendees. And you were one of them? How old are you? 13? If I was 13, that would make you, what, 8? LOL! AGAIN with the school-yard retorts. I may have to revise your age downward. Interesting that you started with a schoolyard retort And AGAIN you project your own actions onto others. Sheesh. Typical rightard. No ability to take responsibility for anything that you do. What a lying fool you are! LOL! More of that refual to take responsibility by blaming others for your own actions. YOU were the one with the childish "How old are you? 13?" remark. If you act chldish then you get asked how old you are. Did you really think that asking if he was in the meeting with Bush was anything other than childish stupidity? My mistake for answering a fool according to his folly. |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
In message , HEMI - Powered
writes Stephen Bishop added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... We have an extremely good military designed for 21 century conflicts. Come over to uk.current-events.terrorisum where we can discuss it. Clearly there is no national elitism going on in that little corner of cyberspace..... The Brits do have a capable intelligence network and a reasonable version of our Homeland Security for their airports, sea ports, and cities but NOT a strategic navy, air force, or ground army capable of a quick reaction battle in a foreign land Like the Falklands? much less something as large as Desert Storm or Operation Iraqi Freedom. I doubt we would ever need to do something that large and even the US could not do it alone. Actually the UK forces are essential to the US who screwed up in both Iraq and Afghanistan in fact the New 2007 US manuals on counter terrorism are virtually eh British manuals with US covers on them. If you can do something better and are willing to help us out, we are more than willing and happy to make use of it. We aren't so arrogant as you are to actually believe that our fecal matter doesn't emit oderous compounds. UK forces in Iraq and Afghanistan were so small as to be inconsequential. US stupidity that size is everything. :-) Witness where they were deployed, just as the French and Germans were, in places with little likelihood of battle casualties nor any ability to inflict casualties on the enemy. I assume you have not seen a TV in the last 2 years? The Brits in Afghanistan are doing the majority of the ground fighting In fact the Brits opened up large areas of Afghanistan the US never got into. 0ver 60% of Afghanistan was never out of Taliban control until the Brits wen back in during 2007 Most of the US did not leave their fire bases even in the day. It was just like the Russians US control in Afghanistan was basically day time Kabul -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
HEMI - Powered wrote:
J. Clarke added these comments in the current discussion du jour Dawwin does not dispute God he just lays out the evidence that shows the development of the species after god started it I don't mean to be sidetracking the conversation, but Darwin started out intending to become a minister (that's a person who stands up in front of a church and preaches, not a government official) and what he learned on the voyage of the Beagle turned him off of religion entirely, so it can have that effect even with people who are already dedicated to their religion. Darwin's two books on evolution are ENTIRELY consistent with Creationism. Darwin certainly didn't think so! -- Chris Malcolm |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
HEMI - Powered wrote:
The only people stupider/more ignorant than atheists are agnostics. By definition, if you believe there is no God, then WHO do you suppose "revealed" this to you? This is the wittiest and most entertaining example of the logical fallacy of peitito principii I've ever seen! But I ought to warn you that using such irony in newsgroup runs the serious risk of being read by people silly enough to think you were being serious. -- Chris Malcolm |
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
HEMI - Powered wrote:
I can't think of ANY reason whatsoever for ANY American citizen to voluntarily leave Not even American citizens voting in as president a left-handed black with a suspiciously foreign name and insanely liberal politics? -- Chris Malcolm |
#318
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
Chris Malcolm wrote:
HEMI - Powered wrote: J. Clarke added these comments in the current discussion du jour Dawwin does not dispute God he just lays out the evidence that shows the development of the species after god started it I don't mean to be sidetracking the conversation, but Darwin started out intending to become a minister (that's a person who stands up in front of a church and preaches, not a government official) and what he learned on the voyage of the Beagle turned him off of religion entirely, so it can have that effect even with people who are already dedicated to their religion. Darwin's two books on evolution are ENTIRELY consistent with Creationism. Darwin certainly didn't think so! Says who? -- Ray Fischer |
#319
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
On 24 Jan 2009 12:33:50 GMT, Chris Malcolm
wrote: HEMI - Powered wrote: I can't think of ANY reason whatsoever for ANY American citizen to voluntarily leave Not even American citizens voting in as president a left-handed black with a suspiciously foreign name and insanely liberal politics? Actually, he is only half-black. That makes him just as much white as he is black. He was raised in a white household by a white grandmother. So strictly speaking, America has yet to elect its first black president. Being left handed is irrelevent, of course. The suspicion is not his foreign-sounding name, but rather the growing suspicion that he is not legally qualified to serve as president because of his citizenship status. Instead of simply providing proof, he has blocked lawsuits and refused to release an actual birth certificate and school application records. Insanely liberal politics? Yes, that's a concern, but we've weathered that storm before. It took a Jimmy Carter to give us a Ronald Reagan. |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
Palestinians Under Attack
Ray Fischer wrote:
Chris Malcolm wrote: HEMI - Powered wrote: J. Clarke added these comments in the current discussion du jour Dawwin does not dispute God he just lays out the evidence that shows the development of the species after god started it I don't mean to be sidetracking the conversation, but Darwin started out intending to become a minister (that's a person who stands up in front of a church and preaches, not a government official) and what he learned on the voyage of the Beagle turned him off of religion entirely, so it can have that effect even with people who are already dedicated to their religion. Darwin's two books on evolution are ENTIRELY consistent with Creationism. Darwin certainly didn't think so! Says who? Darwin. -- Chris Malcolm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Palestinians Under Attack | Bert Hyman | Digital Photography | 3 | January 10th 09 03:54 PM |
Palestinians Under Attack | SneakyP | Digital Photography | 0 | January 10th 09 12:47 AM |
ATTACK OF THE POLTERGEIST II | Eric Miller | Digital Photography | 3 | August 25th 07 06:04 PM |
Targeted attack | Tom Gardner | In The Darkroom | 6 | March 25th 04 01:53 AM |