A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

minimum print time test



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 10th 06, 03:24 AM posted to rec.photo.darkroom
Steven Woody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 164
Default minimum print time test

i found a problem when do the minimum print time (MPT) test. i did the
test use a clean negative to cover half opening of the negative
carrier. then using diefferent exposure time ( 2s, 4s, 6s ... ) to
make a serial of strip on the paper.

after developed and dry the paper, i then try to find in what print
time i can not tell the difference in black between two strips in the
film side of the paper ( the paper is divided into 2 sides, because the
film covered only half of the carrier ). actually, i found the 16s
looks with same black with 18s strip ( that meas i can not tell which
is which ). by this, i think my MPT should be 16s.

but the problem is, the 16s strip is still not as black as the clean
side of the paper. there exists a little difference. but, from 16s
on, the clean side of the paper goes really very black so i actually
can not tell where is 18s where is 20s. i just saw that in some strips
longer than 16s, the film side and the clean side come to totally same
in black.

my question is, should i use 16s as my MPT?

thanks.

-
woody

  #2  
Old August 10th 06, 03:57 AM posted to rec.photo.darkroom
j
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default minimum print time test

Yeah, whatever you want. That's close enough. But you can't be sure your
development is so very perfect to make that base line perfect in every case.

Just doing a normal test strip when enlarging is what you really need to do.
There is no base 'normal' for creative printing.

Get over the metrics and make prints.



  #3  
Old August 10th 06, 11:29 AM posted to rec.photo.darkroom
Henry (k)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default minimum print time test

Dnia 9 Aug 2006 19:24:40 -0700, Steven Woody napisał(a):

my question is, should i use 16s as my MPT?


Yes - even if you (theoretically) get "full" black at 30s it
makes no sense to use this time, because you get no visible
details in shadows (you wrote that you see no difference 16s).

Greetings,
Henry
  #4  
Old August 11th 06, 07:36 AM posted to rec.photo.darkroom
Richard Knoppow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 751
Default minimum print time test


"Steven Woody" wrote in message
oups.com...
i found a problem when do the minimum print time (MPT)
test. i did the
test use a clean negative to cover half opening of the
negative
carrier. then using diefferent exposure time ( 2s, 4s, 6s
... ) to
make a serial of strip on the paper.

after developed and dry the paper, i then try to find in
what print
time i can not tell the difference in black between two
strips in the
film side of the paper ( the paper is divided into 2
sides, because the
film covered only half of the carrier ). actually, i found
the 16s
looks with same black with 18s strip ( that meas i can not
tell which
is which ). by this, i think my MPT should be 16s.

but the problem is, the 16s strip is still not as black as
the clean
side of the paper. there exists a little difference.
but, from 16s
on, the clean side of the paper goes really very black so
i actually
can not tell where is 18s where is 20s. i just saw that
in some strips
longer than 16s, the film side and the clean side come to
totally same
in black.

my question is, should i use 16s as my MPT?

thanks.

-
woody

Its difficult to reach the actual maximum black of any
paper with normal printing. The difficulty is that an
exposure great enough to reach maximum black may result in
an overly dark print, or, if contrast is increased, an
overly contrasty print.
As long as the blacks are fairly deep the eye will
accept them. The best prints are made by finding the
exposure and contrast that result in good looking mid gray
tones, something you can judge by eye.
Personally, I find excercizes such as finding a minimum
exposure both a waste of time and misleading.


--
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA



  #5  
Old August 20th 06, 05:58 PM posted to rec.photo.darkroom
darkroommike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 223
Default minimum print time test

Steven Woody wrote:
i found a problem when do the minimum print time (MPT) test. i did the
test use a clean negative to cover half opening of the negative
carrier. then using diefferent exposure time ( 2s, 4s, 6s ... ) to
make a serial of strip on the paper.

after developed and dry the paper, i then try to find in what print
time i can not tell the difference in black between two strips in the
film side of the paper ( the paper is divided into 2 sides, because the
film covered only half of the carrier ). actually, i found the 16s
looks with same black with 18s strip ( that meas i can not tell which
is which ). by this, i think my MPT should be 16s.

but the problem is, the 16s strip is still not as black as the clean
side of the paper. there exists a little difference. but, from 16s
on, the clean side of the paper goes really very black so i actually
can not tell where is 18s where is 20s. i just saw that in some strips
longer than 16s, the film side and the clean side come to totally same
in black.

my question is, should i use 16s as my MPT?

thanks.

-
woody


The other thing about the "minimum exposure time to yield true black
contact print thingy" is that it works best only when you are exposing
your film for the maximum EI using ".01 over film base + fog" (or
whatever). If you like a negative with more shadow detail and routinely
expose your film at a lower EI all of your contact prints will be too
light.

It makes more sense (to me) in a commercial studio/lab where time is
money and a lot of work is produced without test prints. And it made
sense (to me) in the days before I had my own densitometer to evaluate
"true EI" vs. published ISO when testing a new film against old "tried
and true" (whatever that was that year).
--
darkroommike
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
question about fixing hp5 [email protected] In The Darkroom 20 July 29th 06 05:56 PM
Problems with print consistency part II Michael Sig Birkmose In The Darkroom 2 June 17th 06 03:41 PM
PING: William Graham! Joseph Kewfi 35mm Photo Equipment 543 November 17th 04 03:07 AM
5 minute FB print washing time?? CBlood59 In The Darkroom 7 February 8th 04 05:50 PM
Adjust B&W paper development time when using Uniroller? Phil Glaser In The Darkroom 14 January 26th 04 10:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.